User talk:Gwan123

Welcome!

Hello, Gwan123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Grace Wan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! andy (talk) 09:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

collapsing old stuff up to and including abusive outburst. User indeffed with TPA removed Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grace Wan

A tag has been placed on Grace Wan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 09:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. andy (talk) 09:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grace wan

The article Grace wan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kayau Voting IS evil 07:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grace wan

A tag has been placed on Grace wan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mauler90 _talk 06:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Grace wan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Mauler90 _talk 06:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been moved to your userpage, User:Gwan123, which is where you are encouraged to write about yourself. I hope this works for you. Please see the user page guidelines for more information. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:42, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gwan123. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gwan123. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User has been engaging in block evasion as recently as 2017-07-15, using the Bonjour2017 (talk · contribs) account. User has continued attempting to recreate the same inappropriate article. --Yamla (talk) 13:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gwan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21972 was submitted on Jul 04, 2018 18:42:30. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gwan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21976 was submitted on Jul 04, 2018 22:25:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gwan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've waited for unblock request for more than one year and six months. I know that I am not suppose to have too many users accounts. I promise I will not do it again for create new user accounts. Know all different account names is same user. I will respect and follow the rules and policy for this website. Please unblock me. Thanks.

Decline reason:

This does not sufficiently address the concerns with your widespread abuse. How many are "too many"? Can you please explain WP:SOCK in your own words? Will you agree to refrain from creating articles about yourself? Yamla (talk) 13:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll also note that the unblock request is false. You say you've waited for a year and six months. This is simply false. You engaged in block evasion less than a year ago, as Bonjour2017 (talk · contribs). Your UTRS requests also indicate you still plan on writing about Grace Wan. Combined, this shows you are not ready to be unblocked at this time. --Yamla (talk) 13:18, 5 July 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gwan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21992 was submitted on Jul 05, 2018 20:50:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:50, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have emailed me, requesting I lift your block. But you have continued to threaten to create an article on Grace Wan. At this point, I'm unsure if you are trolling or if you simply don't understand. Wikipedia is not the place for this. This is an encyclopedia, not a social media site. You will not be unblocked to publish an article about Grace Wan. Please read WP:NOTE and WP:AUTOBIO. And for that matter, WP:NOT. I thank you for finally admitting to your numerous violations of WP:SOCK after previously lying about it, but you still don't get it. We won't unblock you to write about yourself. Until you demonstrate you understand this, until you demonstrate you are listening to us, we will not unblock you. You've wasted a lot of people's time here and are continuing to do so. --Yamla (talk) 00:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Email revoked because of WP:CIR and WP:IDHT concerns. --Yamla (talk) 09:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gwan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22018 was submitted on Jul 09, 2018 21:49:37. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gwan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25561 was submitted on Jun 12, 2019 01:07:23. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:07, 12 June 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gwan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25917 was submitted on Jul 16, 2019 07:16:21. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:16, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I don’t why the administration still block gwan123 user again. Why don’t believe and trust and give gwan123 chance to edit the biography on Wikipedia again. Gwan123 (talk) 08:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because you've been wildly abusive. You continue to threaten to create your own autobiography, despite us telling you over and over and over and over again that this is inappropriate. You've repeatedly set up sockpuppet accounts to do this, too. Until you demonstrate you understand and won't do this again, you won't be unblocked. I strongly suspect you lack sufficient competence to edit here, as you have repeatedly demonstrated this profound lack of competence. --Yamla (talk) 10:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yamla

Well fuck you! You are very bad editor. God damn bill shit butch. Hell hack!

Fuck You Yamla god damn bull shit bitch. I am Moran I am bad person well you are bad editor. You never give me chance you think I am bad person. You are bad person. You are stupid idiot jerk dreadful horrible terrible. You say I am cheating and lying person sock- cheater lyier puppet well you are cheating and lying website. I hate this website. This website never give me chance. For the last 10 years. I waited to get approve for many years and you never give me chance to edit my own biography. I want to edit and violence and vadilism. I want to do what ever I want on the website. You are bad sir and bad mam. You bad girl and bad boy. You bad lady and bad man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwan123 (talk • contribs)

Talk page access revoked, obviously. --Yamla (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gwan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25924 was submitted on Jul 16, 2019 20:15:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]