User talk:Goutam1962
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Goutam1962, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Titodutta (talk) 20:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
[SVG Translation Campaign 2019 India] Feedback survey
[edit]Greetings,
Many thanks for participating in the SVG Translation Campaign 2019 in India. It had been quite a successful campaign—194 users from 19 Indic languages took part in the campaign for 38 days, and have created more than 2,500 SVG files, all of them having labels in native Indian languages. You may read the complete report of the campaign at https://w.wiki/3yn.
We would like to thank you again for translating SVG files as a part of this campaign, your contributions have given thousands of people the knowledge that they need the most. Now we would like to have your feedback about the overall campaign, how effective were the training sessions, the resources provided, the support etc.
Please fill the feedback survey at https://forms.gle/4TCicfYzjAGVvKTy6
Your responses are extremely valuable to us, and will be of immense help to understand further training needs or plan future activities in this area. Let us know if you have any questions.
Please note that 4 August 2019 is the last date to complete the survey. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
A plate of Aloo gobi for you
[edit] |
A plate of Aloo gobi for you | |
| Here is one plate of Aloo gobi for you. Aloo gobi is a curry made from potato and cauliflowers and it is popular in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan. Thank you. Titodutta (talk) 14:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC) |
WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge
[edit]
|
Hello Goutam1962. You have been invited to join WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Asia-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the participants.
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge Invite (1)|~~~~}}
Thanks, |
Hi, I moved your new articles to this challenge. They will be copied into the Asian one every 100 or 200. Sign up there if you're doing Indian articles! Thanks!† Encyclopædius 09:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi can you try to source every paragraph?† Encyclopædius 11:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Kailash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sudarshan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Cream Roll (mountain) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cream Roll (mountain) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cream Roll (mountain) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Lambigad Parvat for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lambigad Parvat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lambigad Parvat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6666 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6666 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6635 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6635 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6526 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6526 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6684 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6684 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6651 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6651 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6596 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6596 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6547 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6547 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Chaukhamba V for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaukhamba V is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaukhamba V until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6565 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6565 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6587 I is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6587 I until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of P. 6587 II for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. 6587 II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6587 II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaysinFourty (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Please explain your edits!
[edit]While you have created some worthy articles on mountains, your recent spate regarding unnamed peaks is shocking. I'm fairly knowledgeable about Indian Himalayas, and have trekked there many times, and your recent articles try to pass off, what are in some cases, non-notable outcrops as some prominent mountains. This is not done! You're padding everything with surrounding features and using dubious references. Reliable sources are a must. Please read WP:GEOLAND. And can you please explain the "Cream Roll Mountain"? Please refrain from creating any more articles until you have addressed these issues and responded to the deletion debates. Thanks MaysinFourty (talk) 20:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
@MaysinFourty: Thanks, that you noticed my work regarding Indian Himalayan peaks, and I appreciate that you have visited Himalaya and trekked in this beautiful part of the world. I myself is going in the Himalaya for the last 40 odd years. The name Cream Roll is found in Alpine club journal and I have matched the geolocation, in Uttarakhand list, it was mentioned as p. 6538. there are so many unnamed peaks above 6000 meter in this part of the world but that does not mean they are not worth mentioning. Mountaineers are looking for those unclimbed or virgin peaks to climb. There are so many peaks that do not have a name earlier but after some climb, people suggested some name and that's how a name came. There are no spate as you mentioned, as I worked in the Uttarkhand list if you have noticed that I have almost finished the mentioned name peaks first where I found some climbing history then only I had started for the unnamed peaks. as far as notability concern I really don't know the Wikipedia notability criteria for these beautiful peaks above 6500 metre which are found in this part of the world not in Europe or North America except a few in South America.--Goutam1962 (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Firstly, thank you for your reply. Second, please don't take this personally at all. Please accept my apologies (for fuming a bit) and congratulations for having done some great work on Indian mountains and peaks! Thank you! But you have to keep in mind that not every peak or geographical feature is notable for Wikipedia. Yes, enthusiastic climbers from across the world look for unclimbed peaks all the time, and their efforts are reported in climbing journals blogs. But that does not make it notable for Wikipedia. Once again, please go through WP:GEOLAND link above and read the notability guidelines thoroughly. While you have done great work, you have been padding articles with neighbouring peaks and features just to increase the size. And you have the weird habit of including some completely irrelevant references, like that Times of India Devprayag story. Please slow down. This is not a numbers' game. You are doing great stuff, but please take more care. Every line needs to be well-referenced and we need to have substantial information about a peak or a mountain, or something more than just a name and its coordinates, before it can be included here. Once again, I apologise. But please take better care while sourcing. All the ones I've nominated above don't pass muster. For some examples in sourcing, you can look at articles like Matterhorn or Ama Dablam. Carry on the great work, but with caution and discretion. With kindest regards, MaysinFourty (talk) 07:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Happy Diwali 2020
[edit]
Hello Goutam1962,
Hope you are doing well.
Wishing you a happy, safe, and prosperous Diwali. Stay safe. Regards.
--Titodutta (talk) 22:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello Goutam1962
[edit]I saw your work on mountains and recently, I created a page for Padmanabh and the wikidata page of the same that you had created in February 2019. So, I thought let me ping you because it was you who felt the relevance for creating a wikidata page for such a reclusive mountain. This new page (about this mountain), is dedicated to you. If you need any assitance in creating mountain pages feel free to connect. RPSkokie (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)