User talk:Gospelnous

Welcome

Hello, Gospelnous, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DickClarkMises 04:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Integral economics - A (modern era) synopsis

Hi, was this section written by you. If yes I read it as an arbitrary unstructured set of facts that did not contribute to my understanding of the topic - please elucidate. Best, Rodolfou (talk) 00:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Rodolfou. I apologize for not responding to your post earlier, but only noticed it within the last couple of days.

Your inquiry however, is currently at the center of considerable controversy. Consequently, I've posted a section entitled Integral Methodological Pluralism on the talk page at Integral economics and would subsequently encourage you to review it.

From an evolutionary perspective, I'm proposing using this section's time line in concert with integral (e.g. AQAL) theory to differentiate the respective stages of economic development, primarily in the two lower quadrants (ie. LL and LR).

I hope my explanation helps. I'd also encourage you to post any additional questions, thoughts, or concerns on the topic at Talk:Integral economics.

Brian - gospelnous (talk) 19:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of deletion discussion entry for Template:Integral economics

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Integral economics

Template:Integral economics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — goethean ॐ 14:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Careful about talking about legal action

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. If it had been clearer to your fellow editors that you were threatening legal action against anybody for edits to Wikipedia, you would have already been blocked. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your input here Mike, but let’s try and stay anchored to reality. I have no cause or reason I’m consciously aware of at this point to pursue legal action against Wikipedia. I understand participation here is voluntary. However, if an individual member intentionally engages in criminal activity against another, well that's something entirely different isn't it? As far as I'm aware, as a participating editor here, I never agreed to relinquish the personal rights of protection afforded me by justice. I mean, and with all due respect, that would be rather negligent on my part.

Consequently though, if unlawful behavior is subsequently endorsed or otherwise sanctioned by Wikipedia’s inattention or incapacity to manage it, what does it reflect about the site’s integrity? - gospelnous (talk) 19:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit my comments.

I would appreciate it if you would stop inserting dividing lines into my comments. They are my words, and I have not invited you to edit them. It is true that I removed a space from your comments here, but that is because your formatting made the page difficult to read. — goethean ॐ 19:53, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Integral economics1

Template:Integral economics1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 16:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Integral economics

I have nominated Integral economics, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integral economics. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Gavia immer (talk) 01:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Integral economics.

For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 01:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Central banking

Wikipedia:WikiProject Central banking, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Central banking and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Central banking during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 17:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Integral leadership

The article Integral leadership has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article is mostly unsourced content, much of it is unsupported generalization, some is gibberish

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — goethean ॐ 19:28, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Liberal, The Tunnel and Ancient religion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:We Hold These Truths - cover.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:We Hold These Truths - cover.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Fantastic work on The Marriage of Sense and Soul! It is rare to never that I find an article that I can't improve on. Thanks for the great work!

— goethean 16:27, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing My Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gospelnous (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd like to atone for my wrongdoings!?! gospelnous (talk) 17:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Problems with upload of File:Norwegian-born author Roar Bjonnes.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Norwegian-born author Roar Bjonnes.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Roar (Ramesh) Bjonnes

Hello, Gospelnous, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Roar (Ramesh) Bjonnes, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roar (Ramesh) Bjonnes.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roar (Ramesh) Bjonnes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roar (Ramesh) Bjonnes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roar (Ramesh) Bjonnes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roar (Ramesh) Bjonnes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Economy movement. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]