User talk:Goshlion

Goshlion, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Goshlion! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi , Please tell me your questions Goshlion (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Goshlion! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! EpicPupper (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Simran (actress) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Simran (actress) was changed by Goshlion (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941876 on 2021-05-09T04:56:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hi... can you please upload the image of Vani Bhojan in Wikimedia commons. She have three images but not nice so kindly upload sir. My humble request to you sir please. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4072:6d91:def9:7d45:7def:c700:9b09 (talk) 17:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello Goshlion. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Simran (actress) and your upload of this image on Commons as your own work, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Goshlion. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Goshlion|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely surprised to see the mail, whatever been mentioned is absolutely wrong and misinterpreted, neither any paid or any company is involved or any kind of compensation is involved. 2405:204:101A:313:E17A:E857:9956:80C1 (talk) 07:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yes you are Absolutely mistaken . 2405:204:101A:313:E17A:E857:9956:80C1 (talk) 07:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SIMRAN AT YOGA.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:SIMRAN AT YOGA.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —oscitare ^(talk | _contribs) 09:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SIMRAN AT YOGA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SIMRAN AT YOGA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 02:26, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Odoveer per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Odoveer. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goshlion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kindly note that the block was not necessary,This is a wrong assumption. no harm whatsover has been done either on the article or wikipedia, kindly do the needful, The user writes and corrects the information been given from the original source, thank you

Decline reason:

CU verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.