This is an archive of past discussions with User:Goodnightmush. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi, I'd like to request you delete The Other Nite Show. It is a non notable community radio show from a minor AM station (and therfore not notable, if you don't delete it any other Australian community radio show could put up a page. Cheers, Ryan. 122.148.64.45 (talk) 12:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
By changing the coding for the pictures you are destroying the layout of the affected articles. See, for instance, what you did here [1]. Please be more careful. Reggie Perrin (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure why AWB was changing that formatting and apologize for not catching it. Thank you for alerting me. I have remedied it on the page you indicated. GoodnightmushTalk00:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Please help I dont understand anything, First i upload the profile and it is my own work and i do it as Franco Angeloni and it become like copy right so then i can not do anything they can edit only by admin.,so then after a few week it can edit by user but i dont understand quite well about semi..protect
and then i have another new account and i edit Franco Angeloni (Super Genetic Market) it seem work well and i just checked it now after i up load .,so then i change to be (The Super Genetic Market) and after a few hours it seem something going one that become Franco Angeloni (artist) and it have this text
This article or section has multiple issues:
It does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by citing reliable sources. Tagged since March 2008.
It reads like a personal reflection or essay. Tagged since March 2008.
It may need to be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.Tagged since March 2008.
It may require general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.Tagged since March 2008.
It may need sections. Please format the article according to Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Tagged since March 2008.
Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.
i dont know what to do any more it is seem complex to me...
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
GEEZ, thanks for locking UFC 83...I was trying to frickin restore it to where it was, but vandals were goin nuts, couldnt find shit. thanks man.(no sarcasm)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thank you
i've marked the page, there is a discussion ongoing also. i hope that it doesn't become an edit war to remove the pov-title tag. this name really needs to be discussed. in english, i've never heard of this "incident" referred to as only a 'protest'. seems fishy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.251.26.6 (talk) 23:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:53, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Olbermann
My edit was not original research, it was based on a blog entry by Glenn Greenwald. However, I did not want to cite him because I know that blogs are not reputable sources. Therefore I went to the primary sources for the material. --KarlFrei (talk) 08:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
If you look I nom'd it for csd earlier, but the deciding admin declined to speedy it. Think it might have to be prod or afd. -- roleplayer15:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting a recent vandalism to Silver, but I want to point out that you reverted to the immediately previous edit, which was also vandalism. No offense, just thought you'd want to know. --squirrel (talk) 15:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Just for your information, this user is clearly the same anonymous editor who has a long history of disrupting the ACLU article. I have been keeping track of all the different IPs he's used, but his edit summaries all follow the same pattern, like some demented Stalinist propaganda piece. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive'15:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
I've had my Caly3 G10 plainedge for about 7months and with constant and hard use, it has developed a slight nick of vertical bladeplay. Nothing bad at all,but goes to show that metal on metal friction does lead to wear,over time.-still the Caly3 is a superb cutting tool.
So my question is'would the UKPK be prone to develop vertical bladeplay over time?i know the UKPK is a slipjoint knife,and i haven't handled one yet,and i dont realy know what the parts on the UKPK looks like and the construction,thereof.
i like the simplicity of the UKPK,and sometimes the simpler construction and lesser parts of a slipjoint knife,are more satisfying,and less prone to breakages and wear,i think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.50.110.33 (talk) 16:55, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
There is a small revert war beginning over the Proposition 8 controversy. I believe that no consensus has been made to include the information in the lead. It does not seem important enough for the overall article that be in the lead and i feel it also gives the impression that event is something for the theatre to be defined as on Wikipedia. At any rate i told the editor after removing the information from the lead that i placed a section in the article about the controversy but adding it to the lead was not needed. He has threatened to report my reverts as vandalism and has been extremly insulting.
This page has been vandalised in the past and I believe what is happening is not just frustrating but goes against Wikipedia guidlines for consensus.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
It is staying within the three revert rule....however User:DionysosProteus absolutely refuses to seek consensus and is editing in bad faith. He continues to accuse me of vandalism and has made the threat to have me banned. I have explained in full about consensus, that my not remaining silent was equevilent to NOT having consensus and is within wikiguidelines. I have begun a discussion that he refuses to use in a constructive way. He has misinterpreted policy and guidelines to suit himself. However I need to let you know what I believe he may be doing.
It is my opinion that he is attempting to further a blacklist against this theatre using wikipedia or in the very least trying to continue to label and define this theatre within the actions taken by a former employee that became controversial. I added the section on the Proposition 8 controversy after vandals made horrible changes to keep the article stable and to reflect new developements that were needed in the article itself, however I believe the lead section does not require this added to it. It is my opinion that the lead section should have the most important aspects of the article (as defined by guidelines) however this was not an action taken by the theatre. I also began the article Scott Eckern when the controversy began as I am a member of projects with overlapping interest. Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography, Wikipedia:WikiProject Theatre and Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies. I am editing in good faith and following all guidelines to appropriately care for the article and keep it from being used by editors with either a grudge against the theatre or those that refuse to follow all guidelines dealing with consensus and article talk pages.
I believe Wikipedia:Twinkle may have been misused. I noticed the TW and the differences between his reverts and mine. The user left this on my talk page;
Be advised that you take full responsibility for any action performed using Twinkle. You must understand Wikipedia policies and use this tool within these policies, or risk being blocked.
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to California Musical Theatre, you will be blocked from editing. DionysosProteus (talk) 14:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
