User talk:Golem866

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 05:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Music Meister

The article Music Meister has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

par WP:IN-U and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 14:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dimensioneer

The article Dimensioneer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is about a superhero written entirely in-universe with no critical commentary. The subject apparently was in 3 issues only, and there are no reliable sources writing about this Superhero or providing any sort of literary commentary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Powers and abilities of Bizarro

Hello - I have changed this article to a redirect to the existing Bizarro article which is already pretty well established. Can I suggest that you add any relevant, well sourced content to that main article. Thanks. 7 23:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super Friends

Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. ArtistScientist (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sumo Slammers

The article Sumo Slammers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

In-universe concept with very tenuous links to some real-world inherited notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. baa! _radda 01:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A Comicbook Orange

A tag has been placed on A Comicbook Orange requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 15:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quintessence (Big Bang Comics)

A tag has been placed on Quintessence (Big Bang Comics) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ViniTheHat (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sidekick (comics)

The article Sidekick (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable comic series. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 22:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss image removal, and leave edit summaries

Hi, Golem. Just a friendly request from a fellow Wikipedia editor that it's important to leave an edit summary when you make an edit. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and without edit summaries, it becomes harder for us volunteer editors to keep track of changes. Related to this making changes involving artwork — especially in the infoboxes, for which much discussion over choosing an image has typically occurred — should really be discussed on an article's talk page. Again, one major component of Wikipedia is that we collaborate and all work together, and that requires communication. Thanks and Happy Wiki'ing! - Tenebrae (talk) 15:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Knights who say ecky-ecky-ecky-ecky-p'tang, zzoo-boing, gdgdbaaoizen listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Knights who say ecky-ecky-ecky-ecky-p'tang, zzoo-boing, gdgdbaaoizen. Since you had some involvement with the Knights who say ecky-ecky-ecky-ecky-p'tang, zzoo-boing, gdgdbaaoizen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Double sharp (talk) 15:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Injustice Guild

Injustice Guild has just been proposed for deletion, for being a "Trivial topic on an article that has absolutely no references, despite being around since 2009." DarkKnight2149 13:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Missile Men

The article Missile Men has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 00:26, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Allied Supermen of America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allied Supermen of America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied Supermen of America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 20:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Radiation Roy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radiation Roy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiation Roy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]