User talk:Goldy Berliandaru

Speedy deletion nomination of School Of Bina Insan Mandiri

Hello Goldy Berliandaru,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged School Of Bina Insan Mandiri for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Templat:La Academia Indonesian

Hello Goldy Berliandaru,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Templat:La Academia Indonesian for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Alvin the Almighty (talk) 09:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about La Academia (Indonesian)

Hello, Goldy Berliandaru,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether La Academia (Indonesian) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Academia (Indonesian) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Alvin the Almighty (talk) 09:13, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:La Academia Junior Indonesia

Template:La Academia Junior Indonesia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. AussieLegend (✉) 12:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from La Academia (Indonesian). When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - HyperGaruda (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with La Academia (Indonesian). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cemre Melis Çınar

The article Cemre Melis Çınar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AussieLegend (✉) 15:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Volkan Çolpan

The article Volkan Çolpan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AussieLegend (✉) 15:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Selin Sezgin

The article Selin Sezgin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AussieLegend (✉) 15:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Isabella Damla Güvenilir

The article Isabella Damla Güvenilir has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AussieLegend (✉) 15:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of XfD templates

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to La Academia (Indonesian), you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Eteethan(talk) 02:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing BLPs

Please note that, as indicated in this edit summary, as well as this one Wikipedia articles cannot be used as references. Wikipedia requires references from reliable primary and secondary sources. Wikipedia is a tertiary source and is therefore unacceptable. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Templates for discussion notices or comments from templates, as you did at Template:La Academia Junior Indonesia, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 14:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Isabella Elif.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Isabella Elif.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AussieLegend (✉) 14:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a file deletion tag from the file description page of a Wikipedia file without resolving the problem that the tag refers to, as you did at File:Isabella Elif.jpg. AussieLegend (✉) 14:32, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Isabella Damla Güvenilir has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 14:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Isabella Damla Güvenilir, Selin Sezgin, Volkan Çolpan and Cemre Melis Çınar. AussieLegend (✉) 07:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned about this previously and blocked for doing so. Do NOT continue to do so without resolving the identified problems. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Selin Sezgin

The article Selin Sezgin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article that fails to credibly establish notability of the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 17:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Volkan Çolpan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Volkan Çolpan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volkan Çolpan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Keivan.f^Talk 00:39, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]