User talk:Globgogabgalab33321

AfC notification: Draft:Epimeria quasimodo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Epimeria quasimodo. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:35, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pilmatueia has been accepted

Pilmatueia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nessie (talk) 14:47, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Globgogabgalab33321, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Globgogabgalab33321! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Epimeria quasimodo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Epimeria quasimodo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://northlondonvet.org/top-10-new-species-for-2018. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Natureium (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Arkansaurus have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 19:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to FIFA Manager. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delocrinus has been accepted

Delocrinus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nessie (talk) 17:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Thomas Perner) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Thomas Perner, Globgogabgalab33321!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please work on this in draftspace and submit via WP:AFC when it's ready. Thanks for your work on this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 11:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Belize hammerhead moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Belize hammerhead, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 20:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Paleolamna moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Paleolamna, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 20:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Squatinactis

Hello Globgogabgalab33321,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Squatinactis for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wachtlerosaurus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wachtlerosaurus, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drmies (talk) 02:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

I note that the ResearchGate paper cited in this now deleted article was sourced from, inter alia, "Oregon Institute of Geological Research", which appears to be a commercial enterprise engaged in marketing fossils. A quick google search yields many suggestions that the purported "Wachtlerosaurus" genus may have no support in accepted palaeontology. Please see WP:COI. Are you are paid to make edits to Wikipedia? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Taxonomy/Wachtlerosaurus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Taxonomy/Wachtlerosaurus, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 22:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Belize hammerhead

Hello, Globgogabgalab33321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Belize hammerhead".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)