User talk:Gligan/Archives/2008/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Gligan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Bulgarians
Since you're hear, could you please revert the page Bulgarians. It was sort of vandalised by a user, but I'm out of reverts. (Just a note - I'm not recruiting you in any way - I just want the proper version restored). --Laveol T 20:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks :) And cheers. --Laveol T 20:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- You are welcome : ) --Gligan (talk) 20:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Well Done
I just wanted to say well done and thank you for the work you have done on here. I have done a little work on a few pages about Bulgaria (mainly about Plovdiv) and have noticed the time and effort you have put in to make sure all the Bulgarian pages are factually correct.
I am English myself but my wife is Bulgarian and we travel back to Bulgaria about three times a year. I do love Bulgaria very much :) Koal4e 18:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Template:Bulgaria in World War I
The problem was that the second parameter of Tnavbar-collapsible, which should normally be subst:PAGENAME, pointed to a different template (a copy/paste leftover, maybe). I'll get back for the flags and colours later. Btw, I favour discussions in English because of WP:TPG#Good_practice, but feel free to write in Bulgarian if you prefer. --Cameltrader (talk) 17:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:General Kiselov.jpg
Hi Gligan!
We thank you for uploading Image:General Kiselov.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 19:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Samuel
Good luck with your exams. But the page hasn't really changed that much since February, and not all of the changes are beneficial. (Tell Risker that French apparition is normally appearance in English.) It would be much more than a week's work to fix it. I'm glad to see that someone (you, if I read the diffs correctly) has consulted Ostrogorsky; but he is only the first of several more recent works which you should not only look at but absorb. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- my sumpathies. You really should not do that; but if you are going to make an effort, I can consult Ostrogorsky for you. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Bulgarian authors in translation, I remind you, are perfectly acceptable; the difficulty with Zlatarski is that he hasn't been translated (and that some work has been done since his death). Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Cite the translation if you can (Google Books is good for this); if not, cite chapter and page of the original and title of the translation, and I'll try to run it down. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Zlatarski simply needs support from a modern source in English. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Please add to the description of Image:PrirodaBG.jpg links to the images in Commons that you have used to create it. Thank you. --Daggerstab (talk) 00:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
A nice idea for the template, but I think it should be better divided in two template: one for the First Bulgarian Empire and one for the Second Bulgarian Empire. The topics don't intersect much and the template is already getting very large. bogdan (talk) 19:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
I, along with another editor, have taken the case. It is now open. Feel free to come over and comment. Mm40 (talk | contribs) 20:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)