User talk:Gladysco ball

May 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 20:14, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gladysco ball (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I will be good. Gladysco ball (talk) 11:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Why on earth should we believe you? Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gladysco ball (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a vandalism-only account. I have made a lot of constructive edits. I did not mean to be bad. I promise not to vandalize again. Gladysco ball (talk) 13:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, a Standard Offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 21:29, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gladysco ball (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me by the Standard Offer. Gladysco ball (talk) 12:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. No response to questions below. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's been well over a year, and I am willing to consider unblocking you. However, before deciding whether to do so, I would like you to state what other account or accounts you have used for editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I have not been editing with any other account. Gladysco ball (talk) 20:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then state what other accounts are owned by people you have been cooperating with, and what your connection is to them. There are other accounts that have clearly been used either by you or by people collaborating with you. At least one of them looks much more as though it is you than as though it's a friend you are acting with, but I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it wasn't you. However, I am certainly not going to consider unblocking you unless you tell us what connection you have to those other accounts. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timo3 is my brother. Gladysco ball (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is true. Timo 3 19:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you were unblocked, what edits would you make? FixCop (talk) 01:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would edit number articles like Timo3 has been doing. Gladysco ball (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gladysco ball (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have answered your questions. Now, please unblock me. Gladysco ball (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you haven't. SQL ^{Query me!} 04:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pinging @JamesBWatson:. Max Semenik (talk) 01:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gladysco ball, I agree that this is not entirely a "vandalism-only account", though I think "a few constructive edits" would be a more accurate description of your editing history than "a lot of constructive edits", and there certainly were also quite a few vandalism edits. You have said that you will not vandalise again, and I see no very good reason not to give you a chance to prove that is true. I shall therefore consult the blocking administrator about the possibility of unblocking this account. However, looking at the editing history of your accounts I see a few things which look like attempts to hide some of your history of vandalism, which is one of the reasons why I asked about other accounts, but I don't think what you have said is 100% of the story. I will therefore be that much more happy about unblocking if you can answer the following questions about other accounts.

Haven't you edited briefly from another account with the user name GladysAxoy? Your present account was created in August 2006 under the name GladysAxoy. On 6 December 2006 the account was renamed to Gladysco ball. Three days later a new account called GladysAxoy was created. That account didn't edit until February 2007, when it requested deletion of the GladysAxoy user page and user talk page. Was that you using that new GladysAxoy account?
Do you remember an editor called LizAxoy, aka Liz Wiz? If so, what is your connection to that editor? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I forgot about that account. I created GladysAxoy to prevent anybody else from registering my former username.
Liz Wiz is my sister. Gladysco ball (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have unblocked your account, with the agreement of the blocking administrator. I hope that from now on you can edit without further problems.
A word of advice for the future. Luckily, I remembered this account and the unblock request, so I came back to check it, but it would have been very easy to just go off and do other work, and forget about this account, in which case your latest message could easily have just hung about here for years, with nobody ever seeing it. In future, if you leave a message which you want a particular editor to see, post a "ping" with the name of that editor, like this, for example: {{Ping|JamesBWatson}}. Provided that you also sign the post with ~~~~ the editor will get a notification that there's a message for her or him. Note, though, that the "ping" and the ~~~~ must both be in the same edit: it won't work if, for example, you post a message and sign it, and then go back and post a ping, unless you also sign with ~~~~ again in that second edit. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gladysco ball (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked again? I am not User:Timo3. I am his sister. Gladysco ball (talk) 12:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't have access to checkuser evidence so let's look at the behavioural evidence. You state that Liz Wiz is your sister and Timo3 your brother? Unlikely; see here. You and Timo3 decided to leave on the same day and within 8 minutes of each other? Liz Wiz took a break in August 2007. Then you and Timo3 both decided to resume editing on 25 June 2014 within 3 minutes of each other? Liz Wiz resumed in November 2014. Then you and Timo3 and Liz Wiz all made your last edits (apart from unblock requests) on 14 June 2017. What does all this say to you? Just Chilling (talk) 01:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.