User talk:Giteshs78/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Giteshs78. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Saint Dominic in Soriano/GA1

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Talk:Saint Dominic in Soriano/GA1, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Finngall ^talk 13:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Saurabh Kumar Shah (IPS), to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 03:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Saurabh Kumar Shah, from its old location at User:Giteshs78/Saurabh Kumar Shah (IPS). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 12:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Saurabh Kumar Shah (IPS), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. --Finngall ^talk 13:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saurabh Kumar Shah (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the references are mere mentions of this person. Wikipedia articles require a person to have received substantial coverage, such as someone writing a book about them, or a documentary, or an article in a national newspaper.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saurabh Kumar Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saurabh Kumar Shah (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvements made. Do not resubmit

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saurabh Kumar Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahendra Kumar (magistrate)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mahendra Kumar (magistrate), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Finngall ^talk 04:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Mahendra Kumar (magistrate). --Finngall ^talk 04:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahendra Kumar (magistrate)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mahendra Kumar (magistrate), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Finngall ^talk 16:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for creating nonsense pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 18:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Final warning

After just deleting some of your reposts and then looking at your edits, I would have blocked you indefinitely. Since you’re already blocked for one week, I’ll just tell you that upon the expiration of your block, any problematic edits of any kind will subject you to an indefinite block from further editing. This is because as far as I can tell you have not made a single edit that was a positive for the project and your edits are wasting the time of numerous editors; that is:

Edit warring at Mahendra Kumar (magistrate) to remove the {{db-g4}} tag (when you were not allowed to remove it at all);
Not abiding by the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DM Mahendra Kumar and then wasting the time of multiple editors by recreating the page at Mahendra Kumar (IAS) after its deletion, and then a bunch of other times at other titles (Draft:Mahendra Kumar (magistrate); User:Giteshs78/sandbox/Mahendra Kumar (magistrate); and three different times at Mahendra Kumar (magistrate))
vandalizing User:CommonsDelinker in apparent (utterly futile) retaliation for removal of multiple already deleted image titles that were copyright violations that, in turn, wasted the time of users at the Commons (to others, see Commons:User talk:Giteshs78);
wasting more time at Draft:Saurabh Kumar Shah by resubmitting with no changes to address the prior decline (for a draft that does not meet our policies and guidelines);
the nonsense, inexplicable tagging of George Chapman (businessman) with a Db-blanked tag, which is pretty transparently an attempt at retaliation at Shirt58 because of his deletion of one of the above recreations;
the ridiculous number of pages shown in your deleted edits because you are not making any edits that can stick; and
other edits that don’t appear as malevolent, but which are not competent (e.g. [1], [2], [3] and [4], among many others).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Giteshs78 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19011 was submitted on Aug 17, 2017 02:54:12. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Giteshs78 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry please unblock my acc... i want to write a 1. Mahendra Kumar (magistrate)& 2. Saurabh Kumar Shah(Superintendent) articles.... please help me... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giteshs78 (talk • contribs) date (UTC) 03:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Did you not read the final warning above, in particular the first and second points? It's quite obvious that you do not have the understanding or the proficiency in written English that is required to edit this encyclopedia productively. I agree with Fuhghettaboutit, and am going to extend your block to indefinite -- you should not be editing until and unless you fix these problems. MER-C 04:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) At the risk of piling on: The reasons for a block go deeper than mere language proficiency. You have shown no understanding of Wikipedia policies and procedures throughout your time here. This is not a crime for a brand-new user--we were all new once, and these policies can get very complicated. But over the course of these last few weeks, there has been no evidence that you have learned anything about what Wikipedia is and is not, about the rules, about the principles of collaboration upon which Wikipedia is built, and no understanding of the reasons why your articles get rejected and your other edits get reverted. And there is no indication that you're even trying to learn these things. These are the reasons why I agree that you should not be allowed to edit here at this time. An indefinite block does not necessarily mean a permanent block, but you're going to have to show that you've read the documentation and learned its lessons thoroughly before any reasonable admin will agree to an unblock. --Finngall ^talk 14:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Please help me

heloo, dear User:KrakatoaKatie. delete my user or talk page please and tell me how to unsubscribe from wikipedia.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giteshs78 (talk • contribs) date (UTC) 06:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

If you want your user page deleted, just blank it. I believe you can do that even when blocked. No one is "subscribed" to Wikipedia. Accounts cannot be deleted ever, as your contributions now belong to Wikipedia and you irrevocably listened them to Wikipedia. That licence requires you be attributed for your contributions. John from Idegon (talk) 06:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)