User talk:Giordaano

Welcome!

Hello, Giordaano, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your recent contributions. It's good to see you made an account. I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. Feel free to leave a message at the new user log to introduce yourself! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions at all, check out where to ask a question or feel free to ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Mushin ^talk 13:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Zakir Naik on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ITAQALLAH 18:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Zakir Naik~~. ~~If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. Thank you.~~ ITAQALLAH 17:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

personal attack removed *per ProtectWomen 05:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC) ... What "defamatory content" ? Zakir Naik espouses those beliefs, to Naik it is not defamatory, it is simply his belief. There is no need to feel embarassed on behalf of Naik- he is a grown man free to believe what he wants and share his beliefs with others as he wishes.[reply]

Also, there is no need to attack this user with the improper use of templates (I made this mistake myself early on, but learned my lesson). Please mind [[WP:NPA]] --ProtectWomen 05:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battisti

Ciao Giordaano, I'm Dedo. I have written something other on the subject, in the english discussion page. If this is usefull you could use it to change the text of the article. Ciao Dedo.

Ciao Giordano. I've deleted the Vargas - is a nom de plume - and co.'s paragraph on torture, pentiti and various nuts and garbages. I think Taz is "in difficoltà". It's seems he have only translated the old French article - as you said -.--160.78.97.169 12:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC) ARGH! I'm Dedo, I forget to open the account....I'm so distratto! Sorry[reply]

Ciao Giordano ho aggiunto un capitoletto nella discussione su Battisti in wiki.en. Riguarda il processo contumaciale francese e le "sciocchezze" (rect. PALLE) che hanno raccontato gli amici transalpini. Potresti usarlo anche con quei cialtroni di wiki.fr. Correggere tutto è impossibile, ma dimostrare, prove alla mano, che non sanno ciò di cui stanno scrivendo sì! Ciao --Dedofreg 13:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao mi dai una mano? Taz continua a fare il furbo!

Grazie del supporto, è un pochino indisponente il ragazzo nevvero? ;) ciao e grazie ancora--Dedofreg 10:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Se hai un attimo di tempo vai a dare un occhio all'articolo; ho aggiunto un paio di "opinioni" (direbbe Taz, una è una sentenza) interessanti...Ciao --Dedofreg 07:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Dedo ottimo lavoro. Penso che bisognerà tradurre in inglese le sentenze francesi. Ci provero' appena posso. Ci sono tante pagine problematiche sulla storia italiana in wikipedia inglese e francese - prova a dare un' occhiata a "Red Brigades", o "Abbé Pierre", o (se vuoi divertirti) a "opéraïsme", (su wikipedia francese) Giordaano 07:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Giordaano, ho letto e condiviso il tuo intervento. Non riesci a dare un'occhiata a Battisti su pt.wiki, dove lo stesso autore da te corretto su en.wiki sul sito brasiliano è quasi delirante. Si potrebbe almeno inderire un npov. Io sono un principiante su wiki. Cari saluti. 82.59.92.211 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 11:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Ciao 82.59.92.211, come va la vita ? grazie di aver richiamato la mia attenzione sulla pagina Portoghese. L'informazione su quel sito è molto imprecisa, e di tono decisamente non neutrale. Ho cercato di cambiare qualcosa, ma purtroppo il mio portoghese è del tutto sommario.

Certament si tratta di violazione del NPOV, ma io non sarei in grado di difenderlo adeguatamente nella pagina di discussione (per limitazioni linguistiche).

Le polemiche e gli "edit wars" su Battisti si erano calmati (per stanchezza dei partecipanti, più che altro), ma la vicenda recente dell' asilo politico ha rilanciato tutto. Vedremo cosa succede.

Migliori saluti Giordaano (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Il vero problema per la voce di Battisti su ptwiki, ma anche ormai su enwiki, è principalemnte, a mio avviso, la faziosità dell'utente LQST, che tra l'altro annulla di fatto i miglioramenti che diversi utenti apportano alla voce. Mi sembra purtroppo, ma spero di abagliarmi, persona anche irragionevole. Cosa fare? Grazie. DCGIURSUN (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao DCGIURSUN

penso che l' unica cosa da fare sia continuare ad intervenire. LQST accetta la discussione, il problema è che sembra avere un tempo illimitato a disposizione, quindi riesce sempre a mantenere il controllo delle modifiche. Tuttavia, se annulla miglioramenti recati da vari utenti, puo' essere contestato e "messo in minoranza". Ci vediamo sulle pagina inglese (il portoghese è troppo difficile per me)Giordaano (talk) 19:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie Giordano, hai ragione. Dai un'occhiata anche alla pagina italiana? Alcuni interventi di Marte77 non credo siano proprio imparziali. Cari saluti. DCGIURSUN (talk) 17:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Giordaano, puoi dare un'occhiata all'ultimo intervento sulla pagina francese di Luigi Calabresi. Mi viene contestato il fatto (da me nuovamente inserito con link ad articolo di Repubblica concorde dello stesso Sofri) che Calabresi non fosse presente al momento della morte di Pinelli. (V. anche discussione) Ti ringrazio molto. DCGIURSUN (talk) 09:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your additions to Zakir Naik

Thanks for adding this to Zakir Naik. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 18:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobo Arenas Page

Hi, I posted a response to your comment on the Jacobo Arenas talk page. Hope you find it useful. Colombiano21 (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule

Every user in an edit war can three times revert the article, afterwards I can call the admins to act against an disturbing editor. I hope you are aware of that. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

peer review

I requested a peer review on Battle of Yarmouk to see what could be improved. Wandalstouring (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, Wandal ! I posted some reflections on the Yarmouk discussion pageGiordaano (talk) 10:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yarmouk

Give me references to a couple of up to date works about the Battle of Yarmouk, I can work through them and add anything wanting to the article. I don't mind what modern Muslims think, but it's an extraordinary fight lasting for several days with good initiatives on both sides. Yes, I'm an admirer of the tactics, especially the final Muslim moves. Mohammed Adil and I have been working on pointing out the non-faith nuances like the song by Hind that inspired the warriors or that the Muslim's mastermind wasn't even a rather faithful follower. I'm willing to work out the prehistory about the Riddah Wars, making the desert tribes war-experienced and militarized but my wikitime is limited. Wandalstouring (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of the coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. Roger Davies ^talk 14:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Common Sense

I have just read your old remarks about Antonio Negri and you are dead right, my thoughts about all those ass***** exactly. Preaching Revolution at the Ecole Normale Superieurs, rich trophy bride (leaving poor me green with envy) and then, when enough lives on both sides are lost or ruined, including his own in Negri's case, it must be said: just play possom. Sorry, boss, don't know how this could have happened: I was just preaching revolution for 20 years, no harm intended..(Had to get this out of my system, greetings).--Radh (talk) 12:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hamza Andreas Tzortzis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamza Andreas Tzortzis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamza Andreas Tzortzis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..Jeff5102 (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Giordaano. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Giordaano. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Giordaano

A tag has been placed on User:Giordaano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CptViraj (📧) 11:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]