User talk:GilesForrest
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Hi, could you please....
[edit]...withdraw Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Dr John Forrest (1804-1865) from MILHIST ACR? --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 08:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your interest in the Military history WikiProject's A-Class review process. However, the article you've submitted for review is quite some way from being ready for A-Class assessment. The criteria the article would be assessed against are listed here, and are widely recognised to constitute one of the most rigorous review processes on Wikipedia (second only to Featured article review). Rather than fail the article nomination, as a courtesy we'd like to recommend that you withdraw your nomination for now. You are most welcome to resubmit the article once some of the more fundamental issues, like compliance with Wikipedia's manual of style, have been addressed.
If you're looking for a route that will assist with the article's improvement, you might find it useful to first take the article through the Good article review process or request a peer review. The Guild of Copy Editors may also be of assistance in helping to bring the article into compliance with 'house style', which is really the first priority as the presence of hatnotes (such as those in the article at the moment) is usually enough to cause an article to fail any community review process.
I hope this helps. Best regards, EyeSerenetalk 08:46, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 7
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited John Forrest (doctor), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fictitious and Intoxicated (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Gilesforrest. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)