Jump to content

User talk:Giggy/Archive/January 2008

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RFA

[edit]

I am very sorry and sad about your RFA. You are well qualified, but apparently people don't view you as mature enough because of the past :(. I guess do good within the next few months and I will nominate you next :). Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 00:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also sad and sorry. I regret opposing you, and causing lots of people to pile on. You may have slight judgement lapses on occasion, but you are fantastic editor, and a good friend. Happy new year - hopefully you'll pass in 2008 :) Majorly (talk) 00:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very noble. Can you express again how your oppose caused pile-ons? Fuck. Just say sorry, and be over it. the_undertow talk 11:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to see you pull the plug. The RfA process is a bit brutal to say the least. Hope you keep contributing to Wikipedia in 2008. Happy New Year! Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 00:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I opposed you this time around but it's nothing personal, you're obviously a good and hard working editor and I'll support you next time if I can. Good luck, chin up. Nick mallory (talk) 03:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

[edit]

Keep your head up. Regards, Mercury 01:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's all right DHMO. Don't stop working your stuff here. We need you! bibliomaniac15 01:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to say I agree with the above. I saw your edit summary on the RfA and was a little worried. Please note that your work here is definitely appreciated. After all, everyone knows the fifth try is a charm ;). Honestly though, I suspect an overwhelming passing RfA awaits you some time in the near future. SorryGuy  Talk  02:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd endorse these sentiments. Clearly you are an excellent contributor to Wikipedia and the work that you do is very much appreciated. There still seems to be a worry from a significant minority about your temperament, but that is something you can work on. Let me know if you ever need any help, and accept my commiserations and good wishes, --John (talk) 03:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hang in there mate. You were unlucky that time but don't give up. You do great work here. Cheers, Sting_au Talk 04:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worry not my man. Your time will come. Pedro :  Chat  22:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:AO would like to nominate you for RFA.

[edit]

Not yet though. See my comment here, especially the last sentence. · AndonicO Talk 04:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your help is wanted, needed, and appreciated. Happy new year! · AndonicO Talk 04:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa, not so fast. Reread the part where it says "If/when". :P · AndonicO Talk 00:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Dihydrogen Monoxide

[edit]
Wishing you the best for 2008! Acalamari 04:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about your RfA, too: it's a shame you had to withdraw. Don't worry, I believe you'll be an admin one day here, and I'll support your RfA next time. I've supported all four of your RfAs, and I'll support a fifth. You're an excellent editor, and a great Wikipedian overall. Good luck DHMO. Acalamari 04:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, merry 2008! Sorry about your RfA. I supported this one to the end. But it's okay, because you're like a prolific writer now. You don't need admin bullshit distracting you from your work. <-- Silver lining. Lara❤Love 05:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't feel too downhearted mate; you had many more supporters than opposers, and you are a true asset to this encyclopedia. PLease, please hang around, and have a prosperous 2008. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have a good new year DH. Don't feel to upset about your RFA, you got 76 supports which is a lot more than what the average RFA does, and in the end you were only about 8% off the area that RFAs can pass on. This means your help is wanted, needed, and appreciated even if you don't get the tools. I decided to not participate in this RFA, for reasons stated on my talk page, but if you decide to run again in the near future I will very likely support. I will place the future RFA page on my watchlist so I don't miss it if you do go ahead. Good luck! Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 11:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd nom you next time around, if you want. Honestly, being an admin isn't all it's cracked up to be. Happy new year, and please stay with us. We really need you around here. :) Keilanatalk(recall) 21:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA for Matthew Charlton

[edit]

Hi! I fixed the things you pointed out on that article's talk page. Thanks for reviewing it - we've been waiting a while. Littleteddy (talk) 10:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Music of Australia

[edit]

The nomination for the Music of Australia portal has been successful. Great job. And I would like to take this opportunity to say a rather large thank you, for all the confidence you have given me here on the wiki—with help at GAN, offering to do a co-nomination on my soon-to-be RFA and for supporting my successful request for a position on the featured portal directors seat. Thank you. I do hope one day everyone will see that you truly are a great! editor and your "dream" (using that term loosely probably :)) of becoming an administrator. Best regards, Rt. 16:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The 7th. :) Rt. 11:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alice in Chains

[edit]

Could you please archive Wikipedia:Peer review/Alice in Chains. Thank you, Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 18:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also could you review Chevelle (Wikipedia:Peer review/Chevelle). I would like to get as many reviews as possible so I can skip GA and go right to FA. Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 03:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a look at the above comment. This FAC is a pain in the arsenal, I just want it done. Please support! :P Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 05:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Maby it will finaly be over! 6 supports 2 ubjections of people who don't know what they are talking about. I will be the only member of WP:METAL with 2 featured band articles. If this one finally close soon I will submit Chevelle for FA. Would you please archive Wikipedia:Peer review/Chevelle for me? I tried with the AiC PR and I got confused. Thank you again. On a second note, I worked on Shadows Fall all day (in one day) and it is up for GAN, could you review? Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 05:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French Wikipedia

[edit]

It seems you have some messages over there. :D Keilanatalk(recall) 21:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aah, sorry to make things awkward. You've got another message over there, but basically I'd appreciate your help when you feel that you can. Thanks :D! By the way, do you think Odyssey's ready for FAC? I've finished the copyediting, it looks really good. Keilanatalk(recall) 00:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's me; who else? :P I could do the FAC work but give you credit, all I did was copyedit. You've done awesome work, just poke me when you need help. :) Sorry about your RfA, by the way. Don't let it get you down, you'll make a great admin soon enough. Keilanatalk(recall) 00:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*shrugs* I like the name "cricket", and it was available over there. :) I'll go put it up for FAC, you'll be credited, don't worry. :P Keilanatalk(recall) 00:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

[edit]

I didn't want to canvass noms, and I was already expecting 3 (though I ended up with 2). If it doesn't pass (26/0/0, as of this posting. You never know, though), you're up! J-ſtanContribsUser page 23:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Considering we're about 7 hours into the 7 day period? :) J-ſtanContribsUser page 00:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request on my talk page

[edit]

Your request is  Done. -- Cobi(t|c|b) 02:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

[edit]

Dear friend, I hope you had a wonderful New Year's Eve, and that 2008 is your best year yet! ~ Riana ⁂ 02:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reviewer of the Month

[edit]

Congratulations! Based on the weekly reviews by Epbr123, you're the Reviewer of the Month for December, and will be featured in the next GA newsletter! I'd like to put a short blurb with some basic biographical details about you. Here's what I have so far (fill in the blanks):

Reviewer of the Month (to be updated)
Dihydrogen Monoxide is the GAN Reviewer of the Month of December, based on the assessments made by Epbr123 of the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Dihydrogen Monoxide hails from WHERE'S_HE_FROM and has been editing Wikipedia since August 2006.
WHAT TYPES OF ARTICLES DO YOU LIKE TO REVIEW THE MOST AT GAN?
ANY OTHER DETAILS YOU'D LIKE TO PROVIDE?

Thanks, and happy new year! Dr. Cash (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alternative music December 2007 Newsletter

[edit]
The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 9 - December 2007
"He didn't really talk until he got his girlfriend, and somehow that jump-started his ego, and he went from 'I am Lou, I am nothing' to 'I am the greatest.' He just went ffffft, just flipped the scales. And then he started talking a lot. And then I was realizing from a lot of the things he was saying, 'Hmmm, maybe I don't like Lou.'"- J Mascis
Project news
New members

Pjoef, WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden, Argezas, Pbroks13 and Paper Back Writer 23 joined the alternative music fold during December.

Editors

User:CloudNine
User:WesleyDodds


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 04:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC) .[reply]

WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers January 2008 Newsletter

[edit]
The Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, no. 1 — January 2008
"I remember I was taking a piss at a party once in this multi-urinal stall bathroom, and this guy was pissing next to me and he looks over at me pissing and starts singing 'Under the Bridge' in some twisted key and I though 'Okay. We've definitely made it now; a drunken guy is singing out of key one of our songs next to me in the urinal." - Anthony Kiedis
News and Announcements
New members

Since our last newsletter was sent in October, several new contributors have joined the project: Jack, Pifko87, Dihydrogen Monoxide and Kasperkohler.

Editors

NSR77 TC


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or want to receive it in a different form, please contact the publishers. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 05:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC) .[reply]

happy Mango season

[edit]
'TIS MANGO SEASON....
Have a shlice of mango cheek...well, I am up to my armpits in the things. Yuletide means lots and lots of mangos, as well as turkey and ham and ice-cream and pressies. Were on special so I bought 3 crates for AU$20 and now I have both crispers in the refrigerator full and even with everyone eating two of the ##$@& things every mealtime... I am a bit mangoed out so I thought I'd spread the goodwill around....cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

[edit]

Hello Dihydrogen Monoxide, I hope you had a pleasant New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! Hmm I need some water to drink....~ Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

[edit]
This newsletter is a monthly newsletter with details relating to events and happenings within the Australian Wikipedian community and WikiProject Australia. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or receive it in a different format, relist your name appropriately at the subscription page. Delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

My hap-hap-happiness!

[edit]

Yeah, I got bored with a name that was so similar to my own, and because it ends with an "a", peopl would often think I was a girl, which wasn't cool. Anyway, I hadn't watched that video in years, so that was strange really going into analysing it. --rm 'w avu 10:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disco 2000

[edit]

Hi, thanks for the review. I've replied at Talk:Disco 2000. I think the only outstanding issue is about their lack of chart performance, on which I've requested your further input. Cheers! --kingboyk (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks

[edit]
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed successfully with 34 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral. I appreciate your support! I promise I will wield the mop wisely, and do my best to improve Wikipedia. -- AKeen (talk) 15:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks card

[edit]

Hello, Giggy/Archive, thank you for participating in my request for adminship, which closed successfully with 47 supports, 3 opposes, and 0 neutrals. I am glad that the community thinks it can trust me with these tools; I will try and use my new mop and bucket (or vacuum cleaner!) carefully.

I would like to personally thank you (again) for nominating me, I hope I meet your expectations. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA :)

[edit]

Thanks. XD - Will that make people oppose though? I was advised that 2 co-noms was a lot. Rt. 23:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can't download IRC, clients whatever they are. :) I could download it on a library computer, but I think I pay enough taxes already if it were to break. :D Rt. 23:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. :) Rt. 00:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

[edit]

Hey, thanks for adopting me!!! -Thegamingmaster —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegamingmaster (talk • contribs) 02:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lost and Running collab?

[edit]

I'm stuck on this. I've got tons of refs, plenty of info, but I'm really not happy enough to put this up for GA. It's just missing that little something. Maybe I'm too tired for it. --rm 'w avu 11:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Rouge non-admins

[edit]

Hope you dont mind that i added myself to it :), Tiptoety talk 21:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Reviewer of the Week

[edit]
The Good Article Medal of Merit
Congratulations, I have chosen you as my GAN Reviewer of the Week for the week ending 29th December 2007. Epbr123 (talk) 23:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

[edit]

Whoa, didn't realize it was that bad. If you really want to withdraw, that's OK, but I could take care of it within a couple days if you want. Keilanatalk(recall) 02:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aussie bands...really aren't popular in the U.S. This could be a problem. Keilanatalk(recall) 02:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The E-mail

[edit]

I've responded, and don't worry. :) Acalamari 04:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I'm sorry too. Acalamari 04:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That person you just reported...

[edit]

Was already reported by me and has been banned. Thank you anyway! Compwhiz II 04:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried using Twinkle? Makes reporting and warning users 10 times easier. I love it! Compwhiz II 04:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Really? I haven't noticed any speed change. Compwhiz II 04:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mark Read (singer)

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mark Read (singer), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Read (singer) (2nd nomination). Thank you. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hellz Yeah.

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Awarded to Dihydrogen Monoxide by the_undertow talk for creating a page that makes it so fucking easy that I had to give you the first barnstar I've even given.

AFD nom: Mark Read (singer)

[edit]

...Because it was previously considered at AFD - this is not the first nomination for the article, but the second. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...I believe we need to agree to disagree on the point. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Paul Marazzi

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Paul Marazzi, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Marazzi (2nd nomination). Thank you. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka 3

[edit]

Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate, that landed on WP:100! I paid close attention to everything that was said, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holidays and all the off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, and have a great new year, --Elonka 17:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Reviewer of the Week

[edit]
The Good Article Medal of Merit
Congratulations, I have chosen you as my GAN Reviewer of the Week for the week ending 5th January 2008. Epbr123 (talk) 14:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dihydrogen Monoxide banner war

[edit]

[1] Your second banner leaves something to be desired on the civility front. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. ANI

[edit]

Well, you did offend me, and I was really disappointed for that. But I'll just pretend this has never happened. Please consider not go butting heads with opposers/complainers at RFAs. You're becoming more and more hostile. Anyway, I'll just forget this incident. *pours tea* Regards, Húsönd 03:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crossed comments. I did consider blocking you as I was very upset (and for the record I don't easily get upset). Reporting to ANI is always a good thing when these situations happen, as you can have the feeling that you're doing something about it, without actually doing it. *pours more tea* Regards, Húsönd 03:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I am eating choc chip cookies in real life. :-) I'm glad all ended well. *offers real cookies* Regards, Húsönd 03:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I liked this

[edit]

Very good! Well it made me laugh anyway. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 06:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adminship?

[edit]

Thanks, but as far as adminship goes, I'll hold off on that till I know more about policy, etc like the back of my hand. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 12:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Connie Talbot

[edit]

Thanks for the GA review. I have worked through your suggestions, (though haven't made all of the changes you suggested) and would appreciate further feedback. J Milburn (talk) 13:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Connie Talbot. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 23:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Made further edits, feedback appreciated. Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 17:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! J Milburn (talk) 11:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Zappa GA nomination

[edit]

Hi! I have now adressed your comments concerning the GA nomination. Please look at the talk page, and thanks for the patience. Cheers! HJensen, talk 17:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! HJensen, talk 22:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
More than welcome :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 23:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Monster

[edit]

I had forgotten I’d tagged it; thanks for catching that. By all means, review away! If it helps at all, my only real concerns are the inadequate description of the defining feature (Norwegian loop) and the length of the article, given the abundance of information in the second reference (not sure whether you speak German). Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ talk 23:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't speak German, but I'll take your word for that. I've added a link to this diff, so the editors will be aware of what you said. Hopefully it'll help. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 23:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Hey Giggy, thanks for the star. I don't know what it is about reconfirmation RFAs that makes some people in the community so upset. If people don't really like the process, well, I disagree but I can understand it. But I don't understand the people who say it's a waste of time. I think that's just totally incorrect. It's not a time consuming process at all!

Ah well, the joy of wiki ;) Don't let it get you discouraged. --JayHenry (talk) 02:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aah well...I totally agree with you here, but alas the community isn't as forgiving. I suppose the easiest way to avoide the suffrage that is project space discussion is to edit some more articles...I'll go do that :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 06:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Project space discussion is a bit like heroin. You know it's very bad from the moment it first enters your veins and ruins your blood pressure, but by then it's already impossible to stop. Some people eventually overdose; the rest of us are merely functioning addicts. --JayHenry (talk) 06:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard

[edit]

Your FAC suggestion made me run out of time! ;) I'll finish Bernard later as i have work now, so I'll be back in 5-7 hours. : ) M3tal H3ad (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Enjoy work? That's a good one! I made sure the first thing i did was pass the article : ) M3tal H3ad (talk) 13:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Awww...aint that cute :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 21:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody Sees for GA?

[edit]

I figure, if we can get Nobody Sees up to GA and one of that, I Don't Remember and Lost and Running up to FA, we could then put up Dream Days as a featured topic? LAMB by Gwen Stefani got FTed, so I don't see why this couldn't be. What do you think? --rm 'w avu 11:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Remember definitely has the best chance of FA (courtesy of those five nineMSN videos that I still can't watch...). Although I'm not sure if it's a great idea to go for it *right now*, but some more expansion (progressively) would be good...— Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Monster GA

[edit]

Hi there, thanks for the comments on Speed Monster! I've implemented the changes you recommended and just wondered if you could take another look for me. Many thanks, Seaserpent85 14:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saxophone GA

[edit]

Thanks for your second opinion on Saxophone. I've made the changes you recommended and woudl appreciate your thoughts on them on the talk page. Many thanks, Happy‑melon 21:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A few things still to do - note on your talk page. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


re: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Keeper76

[edit]

I replied. Thanks for your question. Please follow up if I didn't answer your question to your satisfaction. Happy editing, Keeper | 76 23:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You get the DHMO seal of approval. *nods* — Dihydrogen Monoxide 23:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Shadows Fall

[edit]

 Done Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 00:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Powderfinger

[edit]

I was thinking, even though the link to Portal:Powderfinger is supplied in the {{Powderfinger}} template, wouldn't it be better if in addition to the template link, add {{Portal|Powderfinger}} under an article's See also section? It seems like a better choice even though it's blatantly redundant. And good work with Jon Coghill (beef lead slightly so I can use it in the portal :)) Cheers, Spebi 01:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the PF articles would have {{Portal|Music of Australia}} in the see also section - that's why I put the other one in {{Powderfinger}} (2 portal templates together look ugly as Daniel hell). And you're welcome to beef up JC's lead (what about Bernie?) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Both works better, IMO. Will do, and I'll see what I can do with Bernie :) And then I need at least one more free picture of the band or something closely-related to them for Selected pictures. Spebi
I looked through Flickr the other day - all of the free-for-us-to-use Bernie images were from the one uploader, so in terms of variety there aint much out there :( — Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Although, here's them at Splendour, if you like. Not the best photo though :( — Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa, that's terrible! Eh, at least Bradii knows how to license photos properly. Jeanie took over 200 photos that night, if she took only a couple we would really be stuck. Oh well, I'll go digging later on today. Spebi 01:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, not portal quality, but you could probably slam it onto an article (somewhere) just for some variety. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not much point really, you can't even see them, just their lighting and effects and the back of heads. Spebi 02:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That puts us back at square one, right? :S — Dihydrogen Monoxide 02:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heya guys, ever heard of this policy? :) Daniel (talk) 08:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They could be talking about a different Daniel... --rm 'w avu 09:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Somehow I doubt it :) Daniel (talk) 09:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ever heard of this policy? LOL. Or This one? --rm 'w avu 09:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I really think you should stop taking yourself so seriously. Or else but out of conversations where you may not know the full story. And that comment notablty lacks a smiley face, for good reason. Daniel (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, I sometimes forget how text doesn't necessarily reflect tone. I've been joking around all along. And here: Two smileys to compensate. ; ) --rm 'w avu 10:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, wow, sorry. Make sure you include smilies next time :) Sorry about that. Daniel (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
S'all good. ;) --rm 'w avu 13:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
O.o Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Powderfinger-Silverchair-Jake-ATGD-20s.ogg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Powderfinger-Silverchair-Jake-ATGD-20s.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matrikas

[edit]

Thank you for reviewing the article. Changes suggested are done. Please leave a note if anything else needs to be done to make the article better.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for passing the article. However, you had placed Matrikas in the section of Myths, while they are deities. So I placed in the Divinities section. Is it OK with you?--Redtigerxyz (talk) 07:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fine, m'bad. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania '09

[edit]

Hi DHMO. Would you be able to cast your eyes over the Brisbane bid once more (meta:Wikimania 2009/Bids/Brisbane), and give me your thoughts. Basically, your penalty for showing interest in the first place is that I'm going to continually bug you for feedback =).

I've been talking to the Council, and I'm reasonably confident that we might be able to get a commitment for a sizable grant (five-figure) from them should we win the bid; must better than I expected to do to be honest. I'm not going to put anything on the bid page until I get that commitment though, hopefully in the next week or so.

Cheers, Lankiveil (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I Don't Remember

[edit]

Peer review! --rm 'w avu 09:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So the FA push is on? Nice. Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:DYK

[edit]

Someone added your article to DYK and then removed before it was published, but they left your credit at the bottom, so you got thanked for an article that didn't make it to DYK. I apologize for the confusion. The Placebo Effect (talk) 12:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:( Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Alice in Chains

[edit]

Please look at the FAC again. Some guy is making it a pain in the ass to promote, while there are numerous supporters. Please take a look and comment. If you agree with him that is okay, but please read through. He seems to know what he is talking about, but he is not viewing my standpoint, and the supporters, even though there have been plenty of peer supports. Thank you, Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 22:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good god...I hate to be blunt, but welcome to FAC, son :) I'll take a look. Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for looking. Even though everything he has stated has been covered before, he still persists! ARGH!! Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 03:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The FAC directors will take that into account, so hopefully he won't have a major impact on the final close. Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I really hope it passes, this has been going for so long. That editor made me nervous so I put Chevelle for GAN instead of going right to FAC. Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 03:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

[edit]

Here's a handshake for you! Handshakes somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Húsönd 04:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, you just reminded me you're in Down Unda (most markets aren't open at this time where I am). :-) Thanks for the grin. Regards, Húsönd 04:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fake Cat RfA

[edit]

...move it here...? —BoL 04:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/lolcat RfA (nearly up). Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, I won't get involved with it like last time with the EFD. —BoL 04:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But I would be willing to hunt down on people who are going beyond the boundaries. —BoL 04:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All up. I hatez teh formattingz Dihydrogen Monoxide 05:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment at RFR

[edit]

There was a discussion prior to this vote [2], people are just un-happy that it got approved. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 05:07, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I just think it ridiculous that we run a poll after implementing, considering how much discussion there was beforehand (plenty of time to poll during that time). Dihydrogen Monoxide 05:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed! Tiptoety talk 05:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]
Thanks for your support
Thank you SO MUCH for your support in my unanimous RFA. Take this cookie as a small token of my appreciation.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You rock, dude. Dihydrogen Monoxide 05:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA issue

[edit]

Hello, I thought to come to you for advice on a recently passed Good Article, as you have experience in reviewing good articles on a variety of subjects. As I was looking over Kuala Lumpur for minor fixes, I noticed a few problems with the article. Then I noticed a few more and on a full read-through, more yet.

I do not wish to create ill feelings by kicking up a fuss on the talk page or unilaterally pursuing a reassessment. I am not a reviewer myself and the chance of a mistake on my part is certainly real. Perhaps I am being overly critical since I also make minor edits on Featured Articles, a task which may have inflated my expectations for Good Articles. But I don't think so. There are fundamental content problems in the article, to the point where I ask if you could make time to look at Kuala Lumpur yourself. You would make an admirable check against unrealistic expectations.

Let me make clear that I do not think there is anything in the article which several detailed copyedit and sentence reworking sessions could not clear up (though more extensive than I can offer). The article is very well-cited and the content appears to meets all GA criteria other than "reasonably well written". However, I cannot see how the article passes criteria 1 in its present condition, especially beyond the first sections.

To be more specific, in addition to many awkwardly phrased sentences, there are a number of sentences which are grammatically incorrect. For example, here is a sampling of broken sentences found in a quick read-through:

  • The city has many places of worship catered for the multi-religious population.
  • The Kuala Lumpur Performing Arts Centre (KLPac) in Sentul West is one of the most established centre for the performing arts, notably theatre, music, and film screening, in the country.
  • Despite cities around Asia are suffering declining tourist arrivals, Kuala Lumpur tourist arrivals increased from 6,210,900 in 1997 to 10,221,600 in 2000, or 64.6% increase in tourist arrivals.
  • The Hong Kong office of Channel V International, an international music channel, relocate its programme production unit in Kuala Lumpur by appointing the local company Double Vision Sdn Bhd.
  • Despite efforts to promote usage of public transportation, utilisation rates are low as only 16 percent of the population uses public transportation in 2006.

Of course I can fix most of these examples myself, though I might have to guess at the wording intent on one or two. But the underlying content fault remains.

Should you have the time to look this over, I would appreciate your feedback, particularly if the fault is with my understanding of "reasonably well written". Would a suggestion on the talk page that the primary editor(s) invite one of the heavy-hitter copyeditors to help out with content issues suffice? I have no wish to unduly burden the hard-working editors who create quality articles, nor those who might have fallen a bit short of that goal. -- Michael Devore (talk) 04:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The issues there are some that would be picked up on (or should be) in a GA review, so in terms of quality you're fine. I think a note on the talk page, combined with you fixing any issues you have time to look at, would be the best way forward - GAR is backlogged and no fun. I don't have the time/patience to fully look at the article now (burned out by the reviewing I've been doing lately), but I would suggest that you start with a note on the talk page, and perhaps contact a few copyeditors yourself to try and help out. Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Guess I'll post on the talk page that I see more errors and will try to fix them as time permits, inviting others to do likewise. -- Michael Devore (talk) 23:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a plan. Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Re: Wikimania '09

[edit]

Wow, that's pretty awesome! I was feeling a bit alone, but it's good to know there is a bit of support from the community for this =).

If you're talking about the Wikimediaau list, then yes, I'm on it. I like to keep my real name off of here, but I'm the person who's first name starts with "C" and last name with "F". I'll probably bother everyone on the list with a discussion of where we're at once the jury is announced, but I get the impression a lot of people are lukewarm about the idea, so I don't want to get too into their face.

I should bother you on WLM sometime? Lankiveil (talk) 12:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Awesome. Sorry I buggered off so quickly; unfortunately as I've gotten older Saturday has become "clean apartment" day =(, and you didn't seem to be on. Lankiveil (talk) 13:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Alice in Chains

[edit]

Just letting you know, a couple of people got pissed at your comment. Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 01:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (and thanks for the GA review too). Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you comment again? This guy is really being ignorent. He is the only guy holding it back from being promoted, and he won't read the rest of the discussion. Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 19:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look, I must say, his points do have some merit, and it might be better for everyone if you tried to address them as best you could, or else let the FAC go, rather than arguing with him (especially in ALL CAPS...) - if it fails, just give it a while and go for it again, there's nothing against that. Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what to do though, I have stated my reasons for not doing what he wants numerous times. They were a band that was popular before the internet was, so there is not much about what happened between albums. Just about all information on the web is directed toward Layne Staley, and there are no books published on the band. If I can't add that information does that just mean I will have to settle for a very good GA? I don't know what else to add to the article. Woo, this sucks, I really hope Opeth does better when I am done with it. Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 03:50, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left a whopper of a message on the FAC. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 06:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody Sees

[edit]

Hey Mate, can you have a glance over at NS? I've tried to add some stuff, but have to look after my boy. I can't find any other reviews, but I'm sure you can find something I'm missing here. I've kind of just thrown the DDatHE review which comments on it, but other than that, it needs more work. Plus, the song meaning info should be expanded too. Anyway, I'll leave that to you as I head off. Cheers! --rm 'w avu 04:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and, fantastic work on Black Tears! We just need to get NS to GA and IDR to FA and we're right to start on the FT for Dream days. Woot! --rm 'w avu 04:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Will do - this is a nice touch, and I'm sure a few other reviews would have touched it - just need to check my (excessively large, today) watchlist. Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Connie Talbot (again)

[edit]

Hi, you recently reviewed this and passed it as a GA. First of all, we have managed to get hold of some free images, which was something you reccomended. However, I am contacting you because I was wondering if you could offer a third opinion on a dispute between myself and another editor on the inclusion of an external link, as you have some familiarity with the article. The dispute is on the talk page can be found here. If you have no opinion or do not wish to get involved, then that is no problem. Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 12:18, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chimed in there. Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Transylvania

[edit]

Hey there,

I noticed you're on the list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Romania. You still interested in Romania-related topics? At WP:EH, we're doing a collaboration on Transylvania. Any input you might have would be more than welcome.

Cheers, and see ya around. - Revolving Bugbear 13:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry mate - all I know about Transylvania is that I'm a vampire from there (mental note: don't trust real life friends). Hook me up if you're ever writing about Bucharest though. Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rudget!

[edit]
Dear Dihydrogen Monoxide, my sincere thanks for your support and expression of confidence in me and my second request for adminship, which ended with 113 supports, 11 opposes, and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank my admin coach and nominator, Rlevse and Ryan Postlethwaite who in addition to Ioeth all inspired me to run for a second candidacy. I would also like to make a special mention to Phoenix-wiki, you and OhanaUnited who all offered to do co-nominations, but I unfortunately had to decline. I had all these funny ideas that it would fail again, and I was prepared for the worst, but at least it showed that the community really does have something other places don't. Who would have though Gmail would have been so effective? 32 emails in one week! (Even if it does classify some as junk :P) I'm glad that I've been appointed after a nail biting and some might call, decision changing RFA, but if you ever need anything, just get in touch. The very best of luck for 2008 and beyond, Rudget. 15:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]
Congrats. Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Thank you for your welcome! Do you know what canvassing is? What if some convasses. Should they be blocked? No? Yes? If yes, how long? I have seen an incident of canvassing. The guy was blocked for 1 month. Seems a bit long. Cfufu (talk) 02:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know what canvassing is. I don't think they should be blocked per se, although it may be appropriate for a short amount of time in extreme circumstances. I can give an opinion on this if you show me the instance you're referring to. Dihydrogen Monoxide 02:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAOH Madonna (entertainer)

[edit]

Can you pass this now? Do reply on its talk page. Vikrant 13:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane is new ACOTF

[edit]

Hi. I've just set your nomination of Brisbane as the new ACOTF. Please help to improve it in any way you can. --Scott Davis Talk 14:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]

Nambour State High School

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 13 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nambour State High School, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Halo (series)

[edit]

I think your concerns have been addressed. Care to take a look? David Fuchs (talk) 02:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just replied there about the {{otheruses|Halo}} stuff. Dihydrogen Monoxide 02:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doh!

[edit]

After finding myself neck-deep in your edits everywhere I go for a couple weeks now, I finally realized who you are and that at some point during my wikibreak you had changed your name. Good to see you still around :) Trusilver (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awkward moment around about now, eh? Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-use images

[edit]

Fair-use images were already removed by this edit. Why did you remove more images? Can you please enlighten me? --Mankar Camorantalk 11:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use policy states that you are not allowed any (emphasis) fair use images in your userspace (WP:FU). The bot didn't remove all of them, I may not have removed all of them, but the ones I did shouldn't have been in there in the first place. Dihydrogen Monoxide 08:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, no problem. I actually thought so but since the bot did not remove them I thought they might have been acceptable. I'll make sure there won't be any FU (which reminds me of Cena's FU!) images. --Mankar Camorantalk 11:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use images are allowed in articles (otherwise we wouldn't allow them, full stop!) - just not in userspace (and you'll need to rationalise all article uses). Leave me a note if you need any help with that. Oh, and thanks for being reasonable about this (some users get pissed off when you edit their userpages....). Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide 11:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll ask if I need any more help. Thanks for helping me already! --Mankar Camorantalk 12:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

As someone who gave your input into my initial proposal, would I be able to respectfully request your input into a secondary proposal which addresses issues related to the restrictions placed on Blow of Light specifically? Your input into gathering consensus at this discussion would be much appreciated. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 12:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Request

[edit]

Do a barrel Roll! Dfrg_msc 04:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try a somersault! (C< + forward) Dfrg_msc 22:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

[edit]

John Carter (talk) 17:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're famous!

[edit]

Hey Giggy,

Just read this article on news.com.au http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23061435-1702,00.html You get a mention at the bottom of the article. Slabba (talk) 07:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One user called Dihydrogen supported the decision to the delete the entry but admitted they were biased.

"Apart from the fact that anything that appears on ACA is probably non-notable bulls***, this one actually isn't notable," he or she said.

"Plus, I'm bitter cos I didn't get an invite :("

Lulz! Spebi 07:22, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, hrrm, these guys have no sense of humour. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I demand RFA now! LOL. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 07:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also dude, we could get us some whores if we got to Nebraska, I'm more than happy to co-operate with you. Hell, I'll even seduce Jimbo, if that's part of the plan (and it will be part of the plan). But I want the clean one, ok? Dfrg_msc 08:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"One user called Dihydrogen supported the decision to the delete the entry but admitted they were biased." - What the fuck? News.com.au (especially you, Andrew Ramadge), if you read this, you suck. My point was not that I'm bias, it was that ACA reporting is teh crap. And Corey, I still want that invite! :D Dihydrogen Monoxide 10:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good times all round. :D Dihydrogen Monoxide 10:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You got to sound like a party dude, I sounded like Helen Lovejoy! -- 10:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattinbgn (talk • contribs)
Yeah, and your point is...? :D Dihydrogen Monoxide 10:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Surreal Barnstar
for making an idiotic throw away comment and getting miss quoted in a respectable publication for your efforts.[3] Gnangarra 10:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't quite call them respectable myself, but thanks :) Dihydrogen Monoxide 11:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, glad you liked my little find! I've been too busy lately to be contributing to the Powderfinger wikiproject, but I'm still checking up on it. It's going very well, you guys are doing great work, all of those feature articles and good articles. Slab's still around! :-) Slabba (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again! I think I will add this to my user page as my contribution to the national conversation! Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 07:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I ever want to archive this :D Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 00:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

[edit]

My request for adminship was successful at 64/1/2! Many thanks for your participation and I will endeavor to meet your expectations. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 09:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane meetup

[edit]
Brisbane Meetup
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Delivered on behalf of Dihydrogen Monoxide. Sorry you got this later than some other people - took the lazy botop 2 days to run :) Giggabot (talk) 07:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey DHMO: Regarding the Brisbane meetup, how would one participate via Skype? I'm a bit foggy on the mechanics of it all. Not meaning to annoy you or anything. ThirdEchelon (talk) 08:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O hai, I maked cookiez 4 u

[edit]
U winz! ~ Riana ⁂ 08:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dis image not tastez too good, whyz? Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 08:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
U iz not apreshatin teh deliket interakshun of browsa and serva. I giv bucket of lolrus insted? ~ Riana ⁂ 08:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dis is how I feelz Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 08:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one

[edit]

For being mentioned in the news! As a Wikipedian who has been mentioned in the news before, I welcome you to that "club". :) Congratulations! Acalamari 18:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do, I'll send it to you. :) Acalamari 17:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

A belated thank you for your RFA support! That's a nice picture of Brisbane. Archtransit (talk) 21:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

National Association of Stock Car Racing (NASCAR)

[edit]

I suppose it has been awhile since any of the racing vehicles were actually stock but that is what it stands for - it'd look pretty strange uncapitalised ;) Avruchtalk 22:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia:Peer review/Opeth

[edit]

Hey, If you have time, would you mind reviewing Opeth at Wikipedia:Peer review/Opeth? Give me all the crap you see, I'll get it taken care of before FAC. Thank you, —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 19:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I have time. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 01:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review of Furcadia

[edit]

Thanks for the GA review of Furcadia. I more or less agree with you on it, and I've commented further on talk:Furcadia. -kotra (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"because floods of questions are cool"

[edit]

Not really. 17 questions is a flipping tsunami. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 19:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shame...oh well. I wouldn't have passed anyway. Good to see another Bloc Party fan though! WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 19:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rouge non-admins

[edit]

Where you wanting this page to be a blue link? Or did someone make a mistake and create it? Tiptoety talk 01:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, the whole redlink element is pretty cool. Red = Rogue ;) Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 01:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, my point is that someone has created the page, making it a blue link......take a peak...Tiptoety talk 01:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eek - I'll get that fixed. *flexes rogue muscles* :D. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 01:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, :), don't abuse you non-admin authority...lol Tiptoety talk 01:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you need a rouge out-of-process deletion? :P Keilana|Parlez ici 01:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I was trying to get AndonicO to do it, but go ahead by all means. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 01:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I CALL ROUGE!!! :P Get Pheonix to request deletion, and we can speedy it, else... ROUGE!!! :) · AndonicO Hail! 02:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm rouger than all of you...I actually did it...out-of-process of course. :P Keilana|Parlez ici 02:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See the message on your talk page. If you keep taunting me, I'm actually gonna do it. :D · AndonicO Hail! 02:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Say what? Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 02:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It will be our little secret (roughs will one day take over!) Tiptoety talk 02:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. · AndonicO Hail! 02:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wheel wars are what separate the rouge from the red hot rouge... good teamwork Keilana, we've earned our Red Hot Rougeness. ;) · AndonicO Hail! 02:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome. Out of process deletions make the world go 'round...oh wait. The world *doesn't* run on Wikidrama? Uh oh... Keilana|Parlez ici 02:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, it runs on gas. · AndonicO Hail! 02:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

[edit]

Oops, I missed this one. Well done to WP:FING again! -- Mattinbgn\talk 03:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, it came in after your edit ;) Thanks! Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 03:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You guys are like machines... Keilana|Parlez ici 19:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, we're the guys who give the cabal their burgers and soda. Machine style. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 23:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoodoo Gurus

[edit]

How far away from a GA status do you think this article is? Dan arndt (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, nice work. The "ARIA Hall of Fame" section needs expansion, and the "Nominations/Awards" could be converted to wikitable. Too many External links. At a glance though, you could definitely nominate it soon. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 05:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Will work on expansion of "ARIA Hall of Fame" - will need help on a wikitable (any suggestions on users who could help out there) - am continuing to insert references/citations for most points in the article - not certain what you mean by too many external links though. Dan arndt (talk) 06:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is that sufficent for the "Hall of Fame" section - what else do you suggest should be included. Dan arndt (talk) 08:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For a wikitable, I generally leach off Spebi or Lincalinca. With the external links, per (my interpretation of) WP:EL only the first two are necessary; that's also what I'd say in a GA review. For the hall of fame stuff, perhaps speak about why they were nominated for it? It's mostly good though. Nice work, again! Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 23:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

[edit]
Thank you for appearing in my RfA, which closed unsuccessfully with 25 support, 18 oppose, and 6 neutral. Thank you for your question regarding my edits on "Nobody Sees." I'll look forward working with you. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 06:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Returning

[edit]

After much thought and deliberation I have decided to return. Many wikians contacted me by various means and I truly appreciate the support from all of them. Man, did I need that wiki break! I have learned from it and will use the experience to improve. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TSQUAD.

[edit]

You'd be a great addition, mind defecting? ;) · AndonicO Hail! 23:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Kevin O-Dog

[edit]

I was merely trying to point out the fact that the article does, in no way, assert its notability and that it was obvious it needs to be deleted. Editors with partial knowledge of the movie itself and half knowledge of the policies can obviously see it needs to go, which is supported by the current "delete" votes. If I wanted to be uncivil (which is, I assume, why you brought it up) the message would have read very differntly, but seeing how I have behaved with almost saint-like civility in much worse situations in the recent past, I can assure you I had no intention of attacking editors in this much calmer atmosphere. I feel that if it's an attack on anything, it's an attack on the unmerited reverts of the redirect I imposed on the article prior to the AfD. ♣ Bishop Tutu Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ 00:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

[edit]

Thanks for your support. I keep this handy for the very purpose, but lost it on that reported occasion. Wise words. Cheers --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 00:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Woo boy - Gurch's comment there is going straight to my page. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 00:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Open Surface

[edit]

DHMO, read the last paragraph of the lead. Your questions will be answered. Hint, it isn't Rebound Ace anymore. -MBK004 03:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I feel old :( Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 03:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Meckiff

[edit]

Hi, had a look at the GA review. It is actually handy as you have picked up some of the jargon as an issue that I may have glossed over unthinkingly. This one in particular was a good pick up "Meckiff was not called in the 1960–61 Australian season, but his performances were ineffective as injuries restricted him" - how could he perform if he wasn't called in?" "Called" here means a no ball was called for throwing, not being called in. I wouldn't have picked that as ambiguous but it obviously is.

The article is comprehensive, at least on his cricket career. He is (in)famous for one thing and that is the manner of his exit from cricket, drummed out as a chucker.

I have seen a few things I would add to the review. Are you happy for me to add them? -- Mattinbgn\talk 12:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Took the liberty and added already. Glad you don't mind. If you have a look teh yellow monkey has replied to them all very quickly. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 03:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ping. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats guys. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 04:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

I added you to Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Co-directors, per your comment at Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. Cirt (talk) 16:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 04:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here have one of these

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your contributions to Thug Murder. CM (talk) 22:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 04:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Alice in Chains

[edit]

Would you mind re-commenting on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Alice in Chains? The FAC discussion was not closed, but it was re-started by the FA director. Fell free not to, that would be fine by me. Thank you, —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 22:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I left a reply on the FAC. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 04:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thx

[edit]


I have the mop but can you search the RFA meeting shown to find the bucket?
 Thanks for your support, my request for adminship passed 60/0/0 yesterday!

I want to thank Mrs.EasterBunny and Royalbroil for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. To paraphrase a president ... I wish my mum and dad could see the comments made. My dad would be so proud to see the comments ... and my mum would have believed them". I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and you may be surprised to find that I have not deleted all of the pages by accident..... yet).

Thanks again, Victuallers (talk) 20:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Johnson - Dictionary writerBoswell - BiographerSir Joshua Reynolds - HostDavid Garrick - actorEdmund Burke - statesmanPasqual Paoli - Corsican patriotCharles Burney - music historianThomas Warton - poet laureateOliver Goldsmith - writerMy co-nominator - majestically hot water?A bucket for youMy nominator - a seasonal female married rabbitservant - poss. Francis BarberPlay about ... can you find the bucket?
An early RFA meeting to decide if Victuallers can be included as a sysop - use cursor to identify.
Heh, nice :) Congrats. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 04:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Santos (boxer)

[edit]

Several of the points have been attended, it seems you worked with the other ones, cheers. - Caribbean~H.Q. 08:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I ended up with a bit more time than expected. Now it's your turn to review one ;)

RFA

[edit]

Hey thanks for letting me know, I wasn't aware of that. Happy editing! Icestorm815 (talk) 23:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No probs, glad we could sort it out. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 00:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Williams

[edit]

Thanks for your assistance with the Ray Williams article. I had previously reverted it a number of times, and then requested help at the Australian Wikipedians' Noticeboard, as it's a bit hard for one person to watch it 24 hours. It wouldn't surprise me if the wayward editor is Ray Williams himself. A Wiki article about oneself is like having a permanent resume in full public view on the net, and in this case, the resume lists him as being a criminal, which I'm sure he doesn't like. I understand that the subject of the article would prefer he had a nice Wiki page about himself. But after being in jail for his involvement in Australia's biggest financial collapse, he joins the dubious ranks of Alan Bond and Christopher Skase. It was a good move to request page protection for a while. Lester 02:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're more than welcome - edit wars suck, hopefully this'll get sorted relatively soon. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 02:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


RfA thanks

[edit]
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which which passed with 40 support, 9 oppose, and 6 neutral. Thanks for your support. Alexf(Talk/Contribs) 02:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RESCUE??

[edit]

Thanks or the cleanup, but now I'm officially confused, since the page above gives both {{Rescue}} and {{tl|Rescue}} tags for use. You say the first one won't work. Perhaps I erred by giving it in CAPS, and it's case-sensitive? Or is the error someplace else? SBHarris 04:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for any possible confusion there. {{Rescue}} (which produces the template syntax, and a link to the template's page) is essentially the same as {{Rescue}}, except the latter doesn't have a link to the template's page as well. The all caps is different though; note the redlink on {{RESCUE}}. I hope this clarifies things a bit. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 05:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, so. Damned caps! But the reason the redlink didn't throw me off is because I frankly didn't expect an internal link to show up as linked, without the tl template prefix. But I see it does if it's working, and not if not. Golly. These | wikimarkup things (what are they called?) are confusing, as they do completely different things if used in links (where they separate what shows in the text, from what's actually called in the link), than they do when used inside the double curly brackets. Sigh. I suppose the latter actually triggers a subroutine or program of some kind? SBHarris 05:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The little curly brackets (I dunno their names, but the | is called a "pipe" - Help:Pipe) are used to transclude a page onto another page - basically to include page X into page Y. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 05:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I can see how that works for tags and templates, but how does it work when you trigger off a program which DOES something that way? BTW, consider the levels of irony in your use of Help:Pipe, which shows in... red. You have to preview these things, you know :). SBHarris 21:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*slaps on that last point* - I wasn't referring to pipe trick, I was sure there was a general help page on piping. Maybe it's on mediawiki, I dunno. I'm not sure what you mean by "how does it work when you trigger off a program which DOES something that way?" - could you clarify (Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) may be more helpful than me). Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 09:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outdent: I mean if you put {{help}} on your talk page, it does more than just insert some tag template-- rather it actively notifies somebody somewhere. Whereas a lot of other templates do insert a page into your page, which is the template page. There are a lot of other curly bracket things where you fill in spaces, and it goes to some other page and adds your name and creates a subject heading and all kinds of other stuff. I seem to see these as two different actions, but perhaps they are somehow the same, at some underlying level? SBHarris 00:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ultraexactzz

[edit]

Bibliomaniac15 has been working with me as my new coach - and I'm in no hurry. That said, if he thinks I'm as ready as you do, then I'm not opposed to giving it a go sooner rather than later. I don't want to mess with the order of training, though - but, with his blessing, I'd be honored to accept your nomination for Admin. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 04:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I'll talk to Biblio. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 05:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Biblio concurs with your assessment - I'm ready. (Of course, that's what they all say, I'm sure). UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 13:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, if you want to co-nom, you can do so right now. bibliomaniac15 21:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Damn, too late. Best of luck! Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 09:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Losing My Religion

[edit]

I just responded to all your points on the "Losing My Religion" talk page. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of mops and men

[edit]

There are several reasons I've never run. A) I don't need admin tools for what I like to do. The only time I find it tempting is toward helping at DYK. B) I worry that if I had the tools I would be tempted to spend large amounts of time at AFD or ANI -- the great generators of the Wiki's negative energy -- and quickly become depressed. C) I'm generally only sure to be online in the evening for an hour or two, and sometimes miss even that. Some RFA participants oppose when questions are not answered rapidly. I've never had a week where I felt confident that I'd be adequately accessible. D) I worry about what happened to Gracenotes. Though I meant them constructively, I too have made critical comments of editors who seem to have long memories. Running through that gauntlet doesn't seem worth it if all I'm going to do is update the DYK template. --JayHenry (talk) 07:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nice note of encouragement. I now know from my talk page that I would get at least 5 supporters :) It's something I might do in the future, but for now I'm in the middle of an FAC and an FAR (oops, didn't plan that very well) and want to get a few other projects finished in the next month or two. Early March will be my two year anniversary of creating my account so I might start thinking about it more seriously after that. --JayHenry (talk) 00:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SSBM

[edit]

Did all you requested on the Super Smash Bros. Melee talk, see if more is needed to pass. igordebraga ≠ 14:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Semester, New Appeal

[edit]

This semester I am teaching academic writing to a group of teachers at my school. This course starts on Monday Jan 28. I would like to know if you are still interesting in "mentoring". You can see the syllabus at Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/ITESM_Campus_Toluca/SyllabusIf so, please leave a message on my talk page and update the mentor's page Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/ITESM_Campus_Toluca/Mentors, if . If not, please remove your name and information from that page. Thanks! Thelmadatter (talk) 21:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't really have time for this :( Will remove my name. Good luck, Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 09:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cynna Kydd

[edit]

Fixed 'er. Almost. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, incentive to do something :) Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 09:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nom

[edit]

Yes, I will decline at this stage. At least one GA, then I'll think about it =). Lankiveil (complaints | disco) 10:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Aust Barnstar

[edit]
The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
for your efforts with Australian articles Gnangarra 00:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 05:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Back

[edit]

Just letting you know, I'm back. Long story. FT:Dream Days, huh? --rm 'w avu 09:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So I was bored, so I got the proposal started, but I realised, it's a pretty small scope and really, we should include ATGD and its DVD in the topic, so maybe we should work towards vastly improving each of these articles (as ATGD tour article is like to qualify as a list, we probably need to put a LOT of work into it, to ensure it meets the FL criteria, but that would work to our advantage, since we'd then have three FCs and four GAs, a good ratio, I believe. What do you think? --rm 'w avu 12:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just as a side note, the FT criteria doesn't require the topic to contain a lot of articles, it requires it to contain all articles in the topic, if that makes any sense. The only relation that ATGD and Dream Days have is that they were both around the same time, roughly, but the topic is Dream Days and its singles, and that should be it. The topic looks fine at the moment, in my opinion. Spebi 21:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, good to see you back; we'll need to chat some time, mate (hope all is well until then). As for the FT, and using Wikipedia:Featured topics/Christ Illusion as a reference, I think we're fine...ATGD isn't really part of the album, I don't think we should include it. Agree with teh Speb. On another note, I heard Pick You Up on the radio today for...like...the first time since I moved to Brisbane (in 1998). Crazy times.

RFA

[edit]
Giggy/Archive/January 2008, Thank you for your support in my RFA which passed 43/0/1. I would like to especially thank Bibliomaniac15 for being my nominator and admin coach. I would also like to thank Rudget for being my co-nominator. I'm sure that I can live up to the community's expectations as an administrator, and not totally mess everything up. Your comment in particular was very nice "One of the few RFA regulars who actually deserve the tools." It was good to hear this from an editor who I have respected for a long time. Thanks again for your support! Malinaccier (talk) 17:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

[edit]
Thanks!
Giggy/Archive/January 2008, thank you for showing your support in my RFA which passed with 38 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral! I also want to give special thanks to my Admin Coach and nominator, Useight for all of his help and support. I promise that I'll give my best effort as an admin, and I hope that your confidence in me proves to be justified. If I can ever be of any help, please let me know. In the mean time, I have some cleaning to do.

Have a great day! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On Losing My Religion

[edit]

Just want to inform that I left some comments on this article you recently passed to GA. Sorry its late and feel free to object. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 07:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For future note, it might be easier for everyone if you were too just review the article yourself...Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 05:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I do not like. Hope I did not bother you on this things. I do review articles but just the article itself. I do not review it against the cited sources. You know, I use computers in a cafe "with payments" because our computer does not have connection yet. So, what I usually do when reviewing articles is save it in a USB then review it in our house. It made the process easier using Microsoft Word. I usually spot errors. Go back to the reviewing thing, I want to review but there's a restriction. I can not hold several hours in the net; it will cost me a lot. =)--BritandBeyonce (talk) 06:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aaah, OK. Apologies for the rather bad faith assumption. Hopefully you'll get those connections problems fixed up soon. Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 09:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Rfa

[edit]

My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, and I'll do what I can to ensure your opinion of my suitability for adminship improves. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 19:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A request for help

[edit]

Hi I lead wikiproject Seton Hall and am also a part time youtube and runescape addict, as i have the attention span of a 6 year old we are looking for experienced copy editors to go over our articles (especially Seton Hall University) any help you could give would be appreciated. Rankun (talk) 07:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks quite good. Might copyedit a bit if I get the energy and time. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 07:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Irony

[edit]

Read the talk at WP:DEGRADE. How ironic! Lawrence § t/e 09:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Input sought

[edit]

I see that you fight a lot of vandalism and that you're on right now as I type this. I'm seeking input from some vandal fighters outside my usual circle in order to get a fresh perspective:

When we revert vandalism by someone who already received a level 4 warning, any other warnings make it seem like, "Oh, we didn't really mean it when we said that was your last warning," like the parent who says, "This is the last time I'm going to tell you" five times before taking action. What about something like this?[4] Another big reason for suggesting this: So any admin responding to the AIV could see at a glance that the level 4 warning was for a violation earlier than the last one.

When a vandal keeps vandalizing the same article, I've seen admins make the mistake of thinking an edit after the warning was actually the edit for which they'd been warned, in which case the admin fails to block. If the AIV process consistently worked as smoothly and quickly as possible, nothing like this would be needed, but that's just not the case. Sometimes it takes a bit for the admin to research the case. In the meantime, the vandal just keeps vandalizing. This isn't just about the message we send the vandal. It's also about the message we send to any other users who might see all those pages where somebody got a "last" warning followed by several more warnings.

It might also prevent duplicate reporting of vandalism, which just adds overhead to an already busy process. I know I've certainly found myself sometimes preparing to report vandalism only to find the user was already blocked by the time I brought the information to AIV, especially with reports that are more complicated to explain. If I saw a tag like this, I could have moved on to something more useful.

Any thoughts would be appreciated. Doczilla (talk) 10:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been vandalfighting now (just saw it on my watchlist), but I do so occasionally. Anyways, I think that User:Doczilla/Template:Uw-vandalism4x is a good idea - although ideally, the best thing would be for admins just to check contribs/warnings better. I do agree with the notion that repeated level 4 warnings (for instance) are like crying wolf, so I do support this proposal. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 10:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. If it's okay with you, I'd like to copy this onto my talk page to keep the replies together. Doczilla (talk) 10:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A Thumbs up!
Thanks again. It looks like it's going to remain a fairly even split with a slight majority favoring it. I have to present it on a wider scale but wanted feedback from a smaller group of people to make sure it seemed worthwhile to enough people. I understand the argument that some vandals will be spurred to vandalize more if told they've been reported, but heck, that happens when a lot of them get a final warning. I really liked the way you put it in terms of "crying wolf." Best, Doczilla (talk) 10:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wiggles image tag

[edit]

Di, I noticed that you removed the image tag from Talk:The Wiggles, and I replaced it. The article does need an image, as discussed on the talk page, because the infobox image, which is a group photo of The Wiggles, is out of date. Greg Page, a founding member, who had to leave the group in late 2006 due to illness, is in the image. There is no free image photo of The Wiggles with Sam Moran, Greg's replacement, but a call has gone out for one. I'd like the tag to remain, so that it remains on the Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of people list. If you think that the discussion is enough, though, let me know and we'll remove the tag again. Thanks! --Figureskatingfan (talk) 14:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, never mind! After some thought, I think I've come up with a better solution. Although I wish there was a better image in the infobox, I believe that it was a good solution. I've also removed the tag again. Please let me know what you think. --Figureskatingfan (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eek - I forgot about Greg leaving. Sorry about that. Ideally, I would think that the infobox image should contain the new member, but if there’s no free alternative then I’d go with the image currently there, at least in the meantime. You might be able to temporarily justify a fair use image with the new member elsewhere in the article (if you can build a case against {{subst:rfu}}….good luck!), but not the infobox. Anyways, good luck with the article. Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 23:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We all have stinkers sometimes...

[edit]

even i can have my bad days...[5]..I was a bit (well...alot) sloppy with the article...cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, we've all had them, and I've got something equally bad up at the moment. Good times all round. Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 09:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hyjak N Torcha

[edit]

I was hoping you could help me out - having been doing a little bit of work on Australian hip hop artists - unfortunately there are not a lot of sources to reference on the subject. Anyway could you have a look at the article on Hyjak N Torcha and let me now whether it satisifies the notability criteria - particularly the one covering 'coverage from reliable sources'. Any assistance in ensuring or providing advice on the notability of the article would be greatfully accepted. Dan arndt (talk) 08:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tempted to redirect you to WP:MUSICNN, but I'll take a look anyway! :) I think the assertion there is OK (not even borderline, I guess) - some Triple J, some newspapers, etc. It would be good if the refs could be formatted to note the publisher, this makes it easier to pick out the "notability asserting coverage" (blah!). Appearing on a notable record label is also mentioned on WP:MUSIC if I recall correctly. So yeah, it's notable; I've removed the tag. Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 08:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thnx will re-format cited references - have had problems with Precious Roy who has a tendency to delete articles rather than check notability, so I wanted someone independent to confirm what I already thought. Dan arndt (talk) 08:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome, and good luck. Deletionism isn't pretty, but we've won this time! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 08:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Mighty Blessing of Pedro at WP:RFA

[edit]

Git. [6] :) Pedro :  Chat  08:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fatty. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 08:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Informed debate - you can't beat it! Pedro :  Chat  08:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
:O a personal attack! dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 08:55, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That red-link on my talk really should go blue! Pedro :  Chat  08:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Git. [7] Pedro :  Chat  10:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Me > Pedro. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 01:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dewey Shannon

[edit]

Hi Dihydrogen Monoxide. Thanks for helping to deal with the multitude of start-up accounts over at the Talk:Ray Williams (businessman) page. I see user:Le Droit! vandalised the page. One of Le Droit!'s comments was signed a second time, which the second time appeared as user:Dewie Shannon. I believe the two editors to be one and the same. Regards, Lester 09:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Highly likely (oh dear, I'll get eaten for saying that!), but I don't think we really need to do anything about it. I mean, they can't really make a consensus against us with their current arguments, no matter how many socks they create (RfC if desperate). You're welcome to go ahead and request blocks, but I really don't see the point; hopefully they'll realise that it's not working and stop. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 09:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A checkuser was nonetheless run, and there's been a bit of blockage taking place. Aah well. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 01:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator

[edit]

I find I have plenty to do already.--Grahame (talk) 10:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Valid explanation :) dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 10:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Giggy/Archive/January_2008&oldid=1180731964"