Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I acceptz lol. (I will be accepting on behalf of teh kitty). DihydrogenMonoxide 04:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
9:Wot you do when wee-whelwor- uhm, when not happy wif wot uvver admin doing, and uvver admin happen to bees 100-m tall an breethe fire? Kthx -- Fut.Perf.☼ 22:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
If this is Schrödinger's cat, I really have to change my vote to undecided ... or should that be undecidable? Kbthompson (talk) 02:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
If this is Schrödinger's cat, wouldent it be impossible to ever determine the outcome of this RFA and leave the cat in the state of both being an Admin and not being an admin at the same time? Chrislk02Chris Kreider 15:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Like the undertow's :) Actually made me laugh. :D Rudget. 17:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
With all the fur flying here, I figured I better protect the page for one second to stop all the kitteh warz. I'd like to remind everyone to be civil, or face going to the purrrrbitration commikitteh. (I swear that made sense). Don't make me call in the big bad bureaucats. kthxbai! ~Eliz81(C) 00:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Enthusiastic supportJohn Carter (talk) 00:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Support The kitten's contributions have sometimes been messy, but she's improved over time. I notice the main problem has been with Kitty Litter, but that's now being regularly emptied. Kbthompson (talk) 00:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
I Support this Cat as a perfect example of what an admin should be! Dreamy§ 01:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Support awww....HEY! HOW DO I KNOW THAT THE CAT ISN'T RUNNING FOR YOU? (Just kidding.) —BoL 01:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Eh, either way, I would have supported you. I think you would have made a great sysop. —BoL 01:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
I support, on the condition that the candidate doesn't eat their own mouse. Acalamari 02:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Support, because if this RfA fails to succeed, we have eight more to deal with. Darkspots (talk) 12:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Support Has cheezburger. EVula// talk // ☯ // 15:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Support I have no doubt this cat will be a rough great admin and delete the Main Page keep track of her litterbox. Good luck! jj137♠ 03:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Strong support. I'm disgusted by the blatant speciesism of the opposers. Haukur (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose A high percentage of its communication with other editors consists of poor grammar and spelling. Useight's Public Sock (talk) 00:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
As far as I can tell there is only one sentence in which this editor's grammar and spelling contained errors. Are you honestly opposing for one sentence? God, you're a freaking idiot. WP:AGF please and also refrain from making personal attacks like calling someone's grammar poor. --JayHenry (talk) 07:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Umm, sorry to pick a nit, but you are asking someome to refrain from personal attacks one sentence after calling them an idiot. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 12:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from picking nits. WP:NOT#BATTLEGROUND. Also, please WP:AGF before trolling my comments. --JayHenry (talk) 19:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Purleze, ru suggesting other editorz has nitz? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
oh hai thar. plz B c00l & no fite. ktxh. —Миша13 20:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Gee, I didn't realize my opposition would be met with so much contempt. I considered changing to support per JayHenry, but I realized this user is a likely sockpuppet of User:Cat or User:Kitty. Not to mention, his contribs to Kitty Litter and Litterbox weren't all that helpful, I had to keep cleaning it up. Change to Strong Oppose. Useight (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Enough alphabet soup, okay? I'm trying to have a discussion here. Would you please STOPWP:TROLLing me! I have the right to challenge opposers without being challenged in return. --JayHenry (talk) 06:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
How dare you assume that I am a sockpuppet of Useight's Public Sock! I'm a meatpuppet! Useight (talk) 16:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
In that case, shouldn't your username logically (and rather disturbingly) be Useight's Public Meat? --JayHenry (t) 00:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Meat talk make kitteh hungryz. *eats to Usesight*DihydrogenMonoxide 00:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Can be too WP:BITEy. Incivility at User talk:Dog. Thinks it WP:OWNs the CAT: namespace. Too immature. Simple fact that it's a cat is prima facie evidence that it think it's better than human editors of Wikipedia. --barneca (talk) 00:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
"Too immature." - Wait, are you referring to the cat, or to some of our current admins ;) —Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
The cat, of course. All of our admins are paragons of maturity. </suckup> --barneca (talk) 01:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Wait until house trained. Thanks, SqueakBox 01:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment From your user name, I suspect you've always sided with the mouse faction on wikipedia and frankly, that's a pretty poor reason to oppose such an oooh-ah rfa. The candidate's regular contributions to Kitty Litter have demonstrated more than enough evidence of house training and I understand from her contributions to the object orientated programming project that she's even learned to {{flush}}. Kbthompson (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose, will give me and other fellow users allergic reactions. --Maxim(talk) 00:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose. Kittehs wif admin privvapribbu wif extra butttns? Do not want! -- Vary | Talk 03:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose. Not enough AIV reports. WaltonOne 09:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, no. Careful investigation with my sekrit CU t00lz (see illustration of investigation methodology, at right) reveals that this userID is a sock of Morris the Cat, and has been known to post from 101.101.CA.7 (mixed decimal/hex notation used to confuse the mice) which is a known proxy of the anti canine POV pushers and forces trying to restore CueCat to the bar. ++Lar: t/c 12:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Regretful Oppose The unfortunate toilet break/shoe incident is too recent for me to support the candidate at this time. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 22:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose I'm fairly certain it was this cat whom I caught in my ceiling watching me masturbate the other day, and feline sexual predators have no place on Wikipedia. Joe 07:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Neutral until spelling and grammar improves a bit. We can't have an admin making us look unprofessional! нмŵוτнτ 00:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Neutral. Don't worry about us rodents, we're not that defenseless. Scabbers the Rat (talk) 23:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Neutral until someone comes up with a good joke about cats and mops, because I'm sure there must be one, but my mind is blank. --Tango (talk) 01:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
So a cat and a mop walk into a bar.....I'll leave the rest up to someone else. Useight's Public Sock (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
... Cat sits down at the bar and orders two beers. The cat pours both on the floor, which the mop is pleased to drink/clean up. Cat yells at the mop for always taking advantage of the cat's drinking problem (think about it). J-ſtanContribsUser page 03:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh hai i r nootral on ur lolcat. kthxbai. GlassCobra 06:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Until we get some Loldogs (note I did not say "Loldongs"). —Animum (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Summary delete per WP:BLP#Basic human dignity. How do we know the cat wanted to be photographed or used in this manner? Also, is the picture licensed? If this discussion decays further, will that make the cat half alive or half dead? --Shirahadasha (talk) 23:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
