User talk:GiannaHenkel

This is GiannaHenkel's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Personal initiative (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.318.443&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Personal initiative may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GiannaHenkel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, GiannaHenkel. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 07:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Copyright violation check

GH -

I ran a copyright violation software program and found many phrases taken verbatim from:

http://www.academia.edu/4445265/4._Personal_initiative_An_active_performance_concept_for_work_in_the_21st_century

David notMD (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey David!

Thank you so much for your help! Did you use a free software? If yes, could you tell me the name? Otherwise is there an option you could tell me which phrases are too similar or send me marked file or something?

Thank you in advance! Gianna

GiannaHenkel This is the one I use: https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by David notMD (talk • contribs)

you might want to check the drafts again as they were re-created by Gianna at Draft:Personal initiative and Draft:Personal Initiative. GiannaHenkel, please don't follow the journal structure for the format of this article, and please rewrite this topic in your own words and use other broader sources. See WP:CLOP.You can write a much simpler article like the Proactivity article. If the concept is essentially the same as proactivity, I suggest you just edit that article with the content. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AngusWOOF, the problem is: thee submission i drafted was written by me and the author of the original articles of personals initiative. As he and a few other researchers at his department are the only researchers in this field it is kind of difficult to find broader sources on that topic.. And i don't really know it it makes sense to change the structure since there is a reason for it. We should think about you're suggestion to edit the proactivity article - would you just add a subchapter about personal initiative in that case? And wouldn't we have a similar problem with the copyright anyways?

Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Personal Initiative (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Personal initiative, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

please don't submit two copies of the same article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Personal Initiative and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Personal Initiative, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where do i find the draft which is currently being reviewed? I thought it would have been deleted. That's why I submitted a new one with a lot of changes

AfC notification: Draft:Personal initiative has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Personal initiative. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:GiannaHenkel/sandbox/Personal Initiative (PI) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:GiannaHenkel/sandbox/Personal Initiative (PI). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Personal Initiative has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Personal Initiative. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi GiannaHenkel! You created a thread called Copyrighted contend at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Personal initiative (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still does not address the issues I listed before. It reads like a summary of the research paper. It still does not have historical background on the origins of the term. It does not have broad usage beyond the specific research paper. Again, see proactive as a similar concept.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Personal initiative and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Personal initiative, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Personal initiative (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is written in a way that includes weasel words ("some argue", etc.), and is probably harder to understand than necessary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Personal initiative and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Personal initiative, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:21, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Personal initiative concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Personal initiative, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Personal initiative

Hello, GiannaHenkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Personal initiative".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 04:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]