User talk:Ghalbeyakh
CS1 error on Mohammad Reza Moghadasi
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mohammad Reza Moghadasi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in 65th Aggressor Squadron, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Recoil16 (talk) 09:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ahunt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Óscar González (boxer) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ahunt (talk) 10:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geordie Shore (series 20). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ahunt (talk) 12:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Welwyn Preserve. Ahunt (talk) 12:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Ghalbeyakh! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Please read a bit before editing, for example that bolding is a rare feature on Wikipedia, not used to highlight something but almost exclusively for alternate names for an article's subject, those with redirects to it. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Safaee
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Safaee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Blatant Hoax. Sources refer to a different "Safaee" and have been used in this article to falsely promote this person
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Arian (talk) 10:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Mohammad Reza Moghadasi
[edit] Hello, Ghalbeyakh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohammad Reza Moghadasi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Mohammad Reza Moghadasi
[edit]
Hello, Ghalbeyakh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mohammad Reza Moghadasi".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Qatari soft power
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Qatari soft power, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:43, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Italian soft power
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Italian soft power, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Please note that the topic area of the Arab-Israeli conflict is under an extended-confirmed restriction, meaning that editors who do not have the extended confirmed permission are not allowed to make edits relating to it anywhere on Wikipedia. The one big exception is to make edit requests on article talk pages; otherwise, this restriction applies across all namespaces.— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
...is a very detailed article. It's quite impressive—particularly for someone as new to Wikipedia as you—and it shows that you put in a lot of effort when researching and drafting it. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- thank you. Ghalbeyakh (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Deletion Nomination
[edit]Nomination of Qatari soft power for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qatari soft power until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Isouf Qaleed (talk) 07:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Unfortunate misunderstanding
[edit]
Ghalbeyakh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I recently discovered that my account has been blocked due to a misunderstanding regarding Wikipedia's policies. Allow me to provide context and clarify the situation. Recently I studied the concept of soft power, and decided to write an article on Italian soft power. While looking into things, I came across some really interesting stuff about how Qatar wields its influence around the world. I've been to Qatar a few times myself, and I find the way they're making an impact fascinating. So, I decided to write an article about it too. I shared a link to this new article with a group of friends, who, being academics and editors, suggested promoting it by including references in related articles. I didn't know that these actions are in violation of Wikipedia's guidelines. I apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused. I request that you consider unblocking my account, as I wish to continue contributing positively to Wikipedia. Ghalbeyakh (talk) 09:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Technical evidence makes this explanation exceedingly unlikely. Spicy (talk) 10:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Texas A&M University Qatar Foundation Scandal moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Texas A&M University Qatar Foundation Scandal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --– DreamRimmer (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Qatari soft power for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qatari soft power (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.