User talk:GertrudKahl

November 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from de:Alfons Zeileis to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 14:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfon Zeileis (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost all of the sources used here are primary sources - archival documents, etc. We need sources that establish notability: significant coverage in secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfon Zeileis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 14:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GertrudKahl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 14:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alfon Zeileis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alfon Zeileis. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Theroadislong,

thank you for your comment. I took those references out.

I also understand, that in a translated article the source should be linked.

Would it be a better approach to provide only a summary of the original article?

I now worked on the citation of the newspaper articles. Would this be acceptable?

Regards

GertrudKahl GertrudKahl (talk) 15:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfon Zeileis (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This seems like a solid article and a notable subject but I feel like the sourcing needs to be improved, this isn't really a solid basis for a page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfon Zeileis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 06:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alfon Zeileis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alfon Zeileis. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 06:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Draft:Alfon Zeileis. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you added the same mirror as a reference. Please stop; we cannot use sources that are copies of our own material. Sam Kuru (talk) 01:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfon Zeileis has been accepted

Alfon Zeileis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PK650 (talk) 23:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]