User talk:Gerome2023a

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Gerome2023a. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:John Burder‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 19:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes l understand this. I myself am a freelance film researcher and visit many people through the UK, most of which l have no prior connection with. I am starting this out as a project with the hope of finding other notable films makers as part of my research who have been lost of forgotten about in history. All work l am writing up is using existing sources and literature using none of my own claims or unproven statements. I have no vested interest in the subject and gain nothing from doing so. I merely wish to document the work and history of the subject with the hope of further expanding my research. Gerome2023a (talk) 19:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Burder has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Burder. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 21:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, on this page there are independent articles from the following, they not written by the subject in any capacity:

24 Wonderfully Vulgar, Exhibition of 1873-1939 works Library (BIS) of the University of Oldenburg in Germany.

25 BRITISH RELIGION AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR, A Select Bibliography of Modern Literature, Dr CLIVE D. FIELD OBE Dlitt 2017.

23 Horror story from First World War. Daily Echo, Stephen Bailey. 16 July 2010.

22 "My dad's First World War memoirs had been in an attic for years – so I sold my house to publish them". Bournemouth Echo. Retrieved 2023-04-13.

21 Imperial War Museum, London - Archive Collections, The Great War 1914-1918, WW1 Personal Experiences.

19 Diary hidden for 41 years reveals soldier’s hell in First World War. The Times, Simon de Bruxelles. 21 July 2010

5 "BBC Programme Index". genome.ch.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2023-04-13. Grajyt6678 (talk) 12:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Burder (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As previously explained, we need to see significant coverage, directly of the subject, in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. The subject's own website, books etc. authored by them, and sources dealing with indirectly related topics are not sufficient.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Burder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gerome2023a! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]