User talk:A Socialist Trans Girl

Welcome!

Hi Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! clpo13_(talk) 18:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia (talk) 18:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

aj

Your submission at Articles for creation: Île de Croy (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Île de Croy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Île de Croy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Île de Croy (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All information should be referenced with inline citations - see WP:REFB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Île de Croy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Île de Croy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Île de Croy

Hello, Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Île de Croy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Île de Croy has been accepted

Île de Croy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is the Wikipedia Page I am trying to create properly sources and cited?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1 year anniversary of this account

today is 1 year anniversary of this account yay Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia (talk) 02:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting edits in sex assignment

Hi, please stop just reverting changes made by other people. We're all trying to create a good Wikipedia article and we'll need to collaborate. If you just keep pasting in your original text every time someone makes a change we're not going to get anywhere.

You have to keep in mind that we're writing for a general audience, about a general topic. Sex assignment happens to practically every single person born on this planet. It is not a bad or wrong process, and it is also not completely wrong to make an assumption(!) regarding gender identity. I understand that it is interesting to think about the corner cases but especially the lead section should focus on the three main points: 1) What is sex assignment? 2) What are cases where it is not possible? (DSD/intersex) 3) How does sex assignment relate to gender identity.

We're not writing an article about sex assignment in an encyclopedia on intersex conditions or transgender people. All nuance and details can (and should!) be described in the remainder of the article.--TempusTacet (talk) 10:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please know that I am completely willing to collaborate, and if proven incorrect, I am fully willing to concede and agknowledge my mistake. After all, we are both editing the article in good faith.

However, please do not assume that I merely blindly revert/replace every edit done to the page, as this is not the case; I merely revert/replace edits/content when I believe that doing so will improve the article.

FYI, whether it is a bad or wrong proccess is irrelevant, as per WP:NPOV.

And yes, we are writing to a general audience, and as such we should not exclude crucial/relevant information in the lead.

Keep in mind, transgender and intersex people are cruitial parts of what it is, and is what the term “assigned sex/gender” is primarily used for.

Cheers! ^w^ Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia (talk) 11:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't want to assume bad faith but it has now happened several times that you have reverted all changes I and others have made not just in the one paragraph you're working on. This leads me to the assumption that you're reverting the entire article to the last version you have edited. You do not own this article and simply removing everything other's have done is not acceptable (WP:OWN).

It might be your view that sex assignment or assigned sex is a term predominantly used for intersex and transgender people but that is not backed by the sources in the article or clinical practice. Sex assignment happens for every birth of any human and every human has an assigned sex, which is often legally recognized as well.

I also notice that English might not be your native language. It's also not my native language but I've done a lot of writing in English in my life, even specifically around topics of the sex assignment article. I'm also not the only one who has pointed out that cisgender etc should not be capitalized.

Let's have a discussion at Talk:Sex_assignment#Intersex if necessary.--TempusTacet (talk) 11:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert this edit yourself. Otherwise, I'll have to report you for edit warring (WP:3RR). You cannot just keep on reverting other people's corrections of the article with the very same (incorrect) justification.--TempusTacet (talk)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Beccaynr (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware. I already do those things with regular articles. Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary, and editor communication

As I think you know already, the edit summary field is used to explain the reason for your edit, and to describe how it improves the article. Under normal circumstances, edit summaries are not about leaving private messages for individuals, as you did in this edit at Girl. (Which didn't ping the user anyway, because it was malformed.) If you wish to communicate something to me, for example, that isn't relevant to other editors of the page, the best thing is to raise a discussion on my Talk page. (If it is relevant to other users, then it may be best to add a section to the Talk page of the article, {{ping}}ing me to get my attention.) But a dummy edit to the mainspace article itself is not the best way to communicate with an editor, and should generally be avoided. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thanks. Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia (talk) 08:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Username

I saw the note on your User: page about possibly wanting to change your username. You can't do this yourself, but you can request that it be done. The instructions are at Wikipedia:Changing username, and it would probably be considered a "simple" request.

I want to be clear that whether to change usernames it 100% up to you. I do not intend to put any pressure on you – just to give you information that would be useful if you voluntarily choose to do so, either now or in the future. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh nice, thank you Germany FranceUK Australia Russia Latvia (talk) 04:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incident

Hi Socialist Trans Girl. Please do not be unduly alarmed but there is an incident on the Administrator's noticeboard which mentions you. You should have been notified of this by the person filing it but you were not so I am doing so below on their behalf. Please note that this does not mean that I endorse their complaint against you. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:20, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 11:20, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

For your graceful handling of a troll. Kleuske (talk) 18:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hey, I've noticed that your signature seems a bit hard to read. Perhaps you should have better contrast with it, and it would be useful to have a link to your talk page with it. How about this:

'''[[User:A Socialist Trans Girl|<span style="font-family:default;color:#246BCE;">A Socialist</span>]] [[User talk:A Socialist Trans Girl|<span style="font-family:default;color:#FF1493;">Trans Girl</span>]]'''

It would render as this:

A Socialist Trans Girl

Have a good day, from fellow trans-colored signature bearer LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 00:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, seems like the first version I made didn't fit in the preferences box. Fixing it. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 01:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ooh that looks really nice ＼(≧▽≦)／ thanks! A Socialist Trans Girl 06:51, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Public discussion of your account

I feel it is necessary to bring to your attention that you were featured in a segment of the "Lotus Eaters" podcast presented by Carl Benjamin. Here it is -https: //youtu.be/XeVogC9vK8Q. Coronation Crown (talk) 12:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me! A Socialist Trans Girl 07:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TSventon (talk) 11:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me! A Socialist Trans Girl 11:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert - American politics

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages: Content, not conduct

Hi A Socialist Trans Girl, regarding Talk:Vivek Ramaswamy § User:HiResolutionEdits' content removal, please use a different heading, and in future messages, a different approach, when writing on article talk pages.

As these are about content, not user conduct, meta discussions such as who made an edit and why are unnecessary ("No meta").

Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll try to do so in the future, thanks for the tip! A Socialist Trans Girl 12:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do change the heading, though. I can try to find a neutral one if you like. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oki, that'd be appreciated if you could find a neutral one. A Socialist Trans Girl 12:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this works: [1]

~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:04, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It does, thanks! (=^ ◡ ^=) A Socialist Trans Girl 13:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Female human

Hello, A Socialist Trans Girl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Female human, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ile de Croy

Hi ASTG, I have listed Île de Croÿ as a possible articles for deletion. I hope you will contribute to the discussion over here. Thanks, DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 12:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i will. A Socialist Trans Girl 09:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POV pushing

Please can you be wary of POV pushing, even WP:Civil POV pushing. I should report you to WP:ANI but I’d rather we talked first/gave you a warning. I don’t have the cognitive energy to engage in a longwinded argument Kowal2701 (talk) 21:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kowal2701 I'm not quite sure what youre saying. Are you merely saying to be wary of it? Or are you saying that I am doing it? If it's the latter, then could you please explain what conduct of mine you believe qualifies civil POV pushing? If it's the former, then okay i guess. A Socialist Trans Girl 12:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cherrypicking the same outdated sources to push a particular POV with intent to mislead and no interest in representing all reliable sources. It is inherently bad faith and results in the encyclopedia being incorrect and is very time consuming for other people to engage with. I haven't interacted with you loads but you did this in RfC2 of the FdI article and on the political positions of Labour. Please just seek to represent all RSs. Please read this. You might find yourself at WP:ANI if this continues. Your personal opinion can direct which topics you edit in, but they shouldn't direct what your edits are. Kowal2701 (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kowal2701 I just copied the sources supporting it from the previous RfCs, and included all sources for and against irrespective of date. Since (as you pointed out) this is not the best way to do things, I'll categorize the sources based on date as well.

I'm not aware of any contradictory or significant qualifying information within any of the sources categorizing FdI as neofascist. If there is any then please let me know so I can adjust accordingly!

I'm not trying to harm Wikipedia, please remember to Assume good faith.

In the second RfC I didn't even link any sources I found on my own, I just linked the sources already stated/were already in the footnote of the article to ask which checco was referring to.

In the Labour discussion, I just provided a list of sources as you asked me to which you concluded by supporting third way being added, so I don't really understand what you mean with that.

I do seek to represent all RSs, and I concede if reliable sources do not support something.

I've gone ahead and read that; looking through my edits, I don't think it is the case that my opinion can be deduced from my edits. A Socialist Trans Girl 02:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, please just be careful about it, it’s easy to do. Kowal2701 (talk) 07:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kowal2701 oki A Socialist Trans Girl 04:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]