User talk:Gerardmurphy1983

Please refrain from using material copied from existing websites in the articles you write, as this might constitute a copyright violation. Jammy Simpson | Talk | 18:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:KISKEAM.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:KISKEAM.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 01:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pat O'Connor (Cork Boxer)

A tag has been placed on Pat O'Connor (Cork Boxer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 00:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rockchapel GAA

The article Rockchapel GAA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

On the basis that the creator self identified this article as lacking sources I an using this method to propose deletion rather than the speedy deletion track. My rationale is that this will give sufficient time for references fro reliable sources to be found and added, otherwise the article will be weeded out. The article makes no attempt currently to assert notability of this club.. It should be noted that my choosing the PROD route does not preclude another editor suggesting a more immediate deletion track.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That set of GAA articles

I just singled one out for attention, and gentle attention as you saw. But another editor may look at the swathe of articles, see that they suffer the same lack, and propose them for speedy deletion. I know you are busy working on them at present, so leave answering this (if you do) until such time as you feel you have done enough to preserve them all.

I have a suggestion that may help for the future, which is to create the articles in your user space by creating a page such as User:Gerardmurphy1983/final article title and to move it on completion to the final article title. This will give you time to research a complex article without having the urgency of a deletion process to battle against. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boherbue.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boherbue.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Paddy Kiskeam O'Connor.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paddy Kiskeam O'Connor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Mike moral ♪♫ 03:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Paddy Kiskeam O'Connor.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Paddy Kiskeam O'Connor.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mike moral ♪♫ 03:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Lismire.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Lismire.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.