User talk:GeorgeXY

Welcome!

Hello, GeorgeXY, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Mental processes of humans

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Mental processes of humans, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. ~Matticus ^T_C 14:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits of Theory of multiple intelligences

Hello, I see that you are rather new to Wikipedia, so you probably haven't taken the time yet to familiarize yourself with the guidelines for editing. Please read those over as soon as possible so you will be able to make good contributions that other editors will be less likely to delete or take issue with.

I know that your edits of Theory of multiple intelligences were made with the best of intentions, but the sort of writing that you added is more appropriate for a blog than for an encyclopedia like Wikipedia. I really urge you to take some time to read through the pages that are linked in your Welcome Message, which will be of great help to you as you learn how to contribute to Wikipedia. Good luck! Cgingold 16:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Recreation

A tag has been placed on Intuition from consciousness, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Intuition from consciousness is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Intuition from consciousness saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 19:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Discord of perception

An editor has nominated Discord of perception, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discord of perception and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]