User talk:GentiBehramaj

Good start, keep developing. --Arianit (talk) 20:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The structure of the material and outline looks great. I would add more information in each section and pictures to make it more enriching.

Rinalila (talk) 01:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Баклава за Вас. Бујрум!

Baklava for you. Bujrum! Sasobtmk (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cities in Kosovo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peja and Pec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial moves

Please, do not make controversial moves like you did with Lipljan [1] and Mališevo [2] without discussing it on the talk page and reaching consensus. That is not how Wikipedia works. Kosovo town names are very controversial topic and any such a move must be based on a clear consensus. I filed a report about your behavior at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#GentiBehramaj. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Шолја чај за Вас!

Tung! Sasobtmk (talk) 00:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Errors

You are putting errors in some of the articles you are creating. For example: Zhabar i Epërm says 362 inhabitants. I fixed another one Koshtovë, Mitrovica. Please stop creating new articles until you fix the old ones. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carlossuarez46, thank you for letting me know! I will check the articles i have created and i will be more careful in the new ones!--GentiBehramaj (talk) 00:39, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:40, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dumnice e poshtme -- village's name and region's name

You have placed Dumnice e poshtme in Category:Villages in Podujeva, but the infobox refers to the area as Podujevo, which is also the title of the article on it and "Podujeva" is a redirect to "Podujevo". What is the difference? Which is correct? Why is it correct for the English Wikipedia? Also, there has been a dispute over whether the village article should be at "Donja Dubnica" or "Dumnice e poshtme", but there has been very little participation on the talk page. You seem to care enough to categorize the article, so I'll ask if you will provide an opinion in that discussion? Pathore (talk) 06:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

First you said "There's no source that provides the accurateness of this map!", but there are FIVE sources the map is based on. Now it's "The sources are from diff. periods (1918?) and do not represent the current situation based in the latest data". But some of the sources are from the 1990s, and one is from 2002. Each time the excuse is different. The map doesn't claim the situation is "current", it shows areas where other languages have "traditionally" been spoken. It seems you just don't like the map. Further edit-warring will be dealt with as nationalist disruption. I have very little patience for intellectual dishonesty. Athenean (talk) 07:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mirusha Park, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Red willow and Black alder. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mirusha Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pillars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geography of Kosovo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jericho (music band)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jericho (music band), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTcrUvIIbCs.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jericho (music band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jericho (music band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 23:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bezbeli Apstraklije

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bezbeli Apstraklije requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Iamahashtag (talk) 22:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Iamahashtag, could you please me shortly why i am not able to create such articles about music bands? I have not clear whats wrong with it since i have provided i think enough reliable sources. GentiBehramaj (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that you are not allowed to write articles about music bands. It's just this band does not appear to be significant enough to merit an article. Iamahashtag (talk) 23:09, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iamahashtag is there any rule in Wikipedia that limits the significance of a band or a person to merit an article? The Band is famous in Bosnia, as well in Croatia and Serbia. The article would be expanded in the following days but ...!GentiBehramaj (talk) 23:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To the best of my knowledge,there is no guideline, except common sense. When I looked at it initially, it seemed not to be notable, so I tagged it. Additionally I didn't then notice any citations, (but they seems to be there now). Given my recent rereading of the article, it would appear to be notable. I would like to apologize for this waste of time. Iamahashtag (talk) 23:25, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iamahashtag So, it means it is okay now, i mean the band seems to be notable enough to exist as article? Should you or I remove the tag for speedy deletion then? Thank you! GentiBehramaj (talk) 23:32, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:GentiBehramaj/Mitrovica

User:GentiBehramaj/Mitrovica, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GentiBehramaj/Mitrovica and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:GentiBehramaj/Mitrovica during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Zoupan 05:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited City Museum of Mitrovica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illyrian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GentiBehramaj. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GentiBehramaj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GentiBehramaj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]