User talk:General Disarray
I archive all resolved issues, and reserve this space for current exchanges of ideas.
Vandalism?
[edit]I'm concerned with this edit of yours, with the edit summary rvt anon's vandalism. Were you aware that KillerChihuahua (talk · contribs) was the person who last removed the section, clearly not an anon, and with the edit summary The anon was in the right. Removing unsourced OR which has been tagged since 2007 in one instance and since Jul 2008 in the other., there is no way that edit could be classified as vandalism. I hope you weren't accusing an established user of vandalism and instead this was a simply mistake. Please consider reverting yourself or making amends. -Andrew c [talk] 15:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- No I wasn't aware of that. The edit between mine and his was an anon, and the diff showed 7 paragraphs being removed; it looked like apparent vandalism. I'd presummed it was the anon since that was the last edit at the time. I see it's been changed several times over now, and is apparently resolved. Regards. DisarrayGeneral 07:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Gonzales' genealogy (old discussion)
[edit]I've been away from maintaining my bahai-library.com for a few years. I'm back at it now, and just came across your 2005 discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Davidic_line/Archive_1#BUPC about the chart I long ago posted online at http://bahai-library.com/gonzales_genealogy_shoghieffendi . I appreciated seeing your points about the problems with the scan, and updated my page to improve it. I wish I had a better copy of the originals. It sounds like you know quite a bit about the history off this document. If you can point me to any other sources for information about the chart, or about Gonzales himself, or any better scans of the chart, I would be grateful. Thank you! Jonah Winters (talk) 06:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Masonandpepe.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Masonandpepe.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Nchase.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Nchase.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Redsky89 (talk) 06:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Peperemey.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peperemey.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Docneal.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Docneal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
File:DLJ.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DLJ.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aghsán until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.