Jump to content

User talk:Gem-fanat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gem and Jewelry Wikiproject

[edit]

Hi, I have just recently begun the groundwork for a wikiproject on Gems and Jewelry. Have not put it up for proposal yet, but would you be interested in working on this? My start page is at my user space - here. If not - cheers! SauliH 02:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Treat the working page as if it were up and running. Add what you like, and be prepared to be edited mercilessly! :) Eventually we can do a move to a WP name that makes sense. We can put it up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals to for a broader reach, but I think if look at active editors on the pages, it will be a better way to go. SauliH 19:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We should make an effort to recruit a number of editors for the project. Three things we could do. One add WP proposal at WP Proposals to garner some interest. Two, scour the frequent editors of Gem and jewelry related pages for people we can invite directly (many do not watch the WP Proposals page). Three, just get the WP started and let start tagging pages, and as editors see the tags, and activity, they may add their particpation to the WP. We should decide what type of relationship to form with Wikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and minerals. The problem that I see is that the WP never got past the first problem of resolving on an infobox, and has stagnated. I am of the mind to combine projects with a merge, and cover rock and mineral subjects as well. While I am not a rock freak - I am from jewelry retail perspective - and wouldn't involve myself into minerology discussions, and the scope would grow greatly, it would maybe resolve some of the overlapping territory. A name for the project could be Wikipedia:WikiProject Minerology, Gemology, and Jewelry. We could maintain a sister-project relationship as another alternative. SauliH 06:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
part of an independant store with associations to org's that hold a high ethical standard. I want to protect anonymity somewhat. I do hold a GIA title in diamond grading.SauliH 23:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome back! I had a great Xmas and New Year with all the busyness of the retail season and all, and family. With regards to your comment about procedures regarding starting a WP, there is no set procedure, although guidelines are given for best practice. Emphasis is placed on getting together a group of editors who are motivated to stick to it. I am part of a couple other WP's and have started one recently at WP:AUSTHIST (I am an Australian expatriate). I feel my strength is in some of the meta stuff, and organising resources for others to work from. I emphasize consistency in naming and presentation, and would be advocating ways to do this. Our initial objective would be to take stock of the breadth of coverage of Gems and jewelry, and lay out additional areas for initial stub creation and article development.
With relation to the border between gems and minerals. I tend to agree with you to maintain a sister project relationship (rather than a merge) with the minerals WP. We should not be concerned about treading on toes however, heck a sapphire is a gem in the minds of almost everyone out there, and needs to be tackled from that perspective primarily. The WP will provide a forum for discussion of article content should issues arise. Did you have any thoughts over your break? SauliH 06:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Moved the WP tonight. Find it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry. Did a lot of work to get a framework up, and managed to work out how the automatic tallying of assessed articles is done. SauliH 07:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean an infobox? On the project side I used the talk page project banner set up by WP:AUS to create Template:WP Gemology and Jewelry. I have been adding this to a number of pages, in the hope, that by doing so people will see it and jump on board. Where are you working on the templates, if I have any ideas while you develop it I can then provide some input. Tucson? No. I would love to get there some time, but we have other industry shows I get to, and they keep us busy. Fortunately we have awesome suppliers we source our color through. Cheers. SauliH 16:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Articles needing creation can be sorted out into various subpages which I just finished creating this morning. You can link to them in the banner where it says Gemstone Project page, Jewelry Project Page etc... At some point we should sort out the article list on the front page, and cull some of the crud in there (I pinched the topics from a websource). I will be more than happy to connect you to various WP pages. We should have a fairly robust tool for getting a handle on the whole WP subject area, and assessing the quality of articles. SauliH 19:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially I created subpages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry/Gemstones‎, andWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry/Jewelry‎, Wikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry/Gemology‎, Wikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry/Business‎, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry/People for us to list articles which need work. The redlinks from here should be moved over to the appropriate pages. Eventually we will cull the list down to just redlinks - once we see what areas are well covered. The Template:WP Gemology and Jewelry on the other hand is for categorizing the talk pages, as well as rating them for quality and importance to Wikipedia. The page at Wikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry/Assessment outlines this in detail. Hopefully this time I made more sense :) SauliH 21:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there!

[edit]

Glad you enjoyed Tucson. One day I will get there. Thought I'd put a couple WP links up here for you, if you had not ventured there yet. To do Page, and Article List with Worklist.

You said something about the De Beers article being completely replaced with a new page. I had not been keeping a close eye on it, so if you link me to an edit comparison like this one I will take a look and see if we can reintroduce any old content into what is there now.SauliH 04:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject France

[edit]
Welcome Gem-fanat, to the WikiProject France! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on France-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject France}}.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
  • Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
  • We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.
Wikipedia:France-related tasks
view • edit • discuss • history • watch

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project!

STTW (talk) 12:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gemnology

[edit]

If I can help with the Gemmology project let me know. I have posted some PDF files of data that I have begun to assemble at: http://groups.google.com/group/gemology?lnk=iggc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gemology (talk • contribs) 06:24, 12 April 2007

The above message was not from me, the user forgot to sign. Anyways all the best for the work on Gemnolgy! STTW (talk) 06:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sapphire requires attention

[edit]

Hi there! I have just looked up the article Sapphire and found that the last two paragraphs of it (beginning with "all the things say about sapphires is not true") have a lot of grammatical mistakes and also questionable content. You can see in the history page, that a certain unsigned user (who added the last two paragraphs) also removed a lot of content. Since I do not really know my way around Wiki nor gems, I though that rather than changing it myself I would let someone know about the problem I found. I hope you don't mind.

Bye: Matyas 213.16.121.165 10:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.. will check it out ! Thanks !

Gem-fanat 20:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Christianity

[edit]

I had thought about checking out those other sites at the same time, but with articles like this, it is rarely a good idea to remove controversial material (or links) all at once with little advance warning, even if you do have policy behind you. Infidel.org is a tricky case becase many of their articles are actually reposts of other, more notable, people's articles, and if I remember correctly, there was a fight a long time ago over skeptics annotated bible, I don't remember exactly how it all went down, but justifying the removal of it now could take quite some effort, and I don't contribute to the Criticism of Christianity article often. Homestarmy 17:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dzi bead

[edit]

Hi, I was only referencing a link that has been there before. You are welcome to make any changes to external links on dzi bead. Benjwong 19:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gemology

[edit]

I sure would like to take up your offer. Neptunekh 07:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl of Lao-Tzu

[edit]

Re: removal of spam. This was not meant to be spam. I've re-inserted the link for the "Ripley's believe It or Not". I would have uploaded the picture to Wikipedia, yet could not due to copyright. The pearlforpeace.org link was the only place to retrieve this picture.

Greek Agate

[edit]

Ok I created and rewrote the Greek Agate article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_agate Can you please look at it and edit it? I change alot of the words. Thanks! Neptunekh 21:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian Garnet

[edit]

I'm not sure if this is the proper way to leave a question but here goes: QVC has begun selling a gemstone they call a "Brazilian garnet." It is reddish-purple in color. Is this actually almandine? Does it even come from Brazil? Should there be a link from it to almandine or mention in the latter that almandines are also sold under the name "Brazilian garnet"? Thank you, Rissa (9/16/07).

-- Not quite sure... it could be spessartite as there were some recent finds of that garnet in Brazil, with very hoppered crystal form, and fairly large size. However if QVC means that particular garnet I am not sure.. they have so many trade names that usually try to either upgrade the material.. or associate the same material with a location that is more famous and hence often more valuable. By doing so, their material gets the appearance of a more valuable product as well, whereas in reality it is not. Gem-fanat 21:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- But yes all garnets in fact, including almandine, have been found in Brazil for a long time. Just thinking about spessartine since it was such a rave in the mineral world in the last 3-4 years.

WikiProject Newsletter n°1

[edit]

Bonjour and welcome to the first WikiProject France newsletter!! It should become a monthly special of our project, but until the next issue, here are some points to consider for the month:

It doesn't seem like a lot, so I hope we will still have enough problems for nexts months issue. Salut till the next issue, ChrisDHDR (17:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

WikiProject Newsletter n°2

[edit]

It's been one high aiming month! The French WikiProject and related pages have been aiming high for Christmas - and have received an equal number of presents in return!

Well, that's this issue. Au revoir et à bientôt till the next time, ChrisDHDR (18:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Morganite_from_Elizabeth_R_Mine_Pala,_San_Diego,_CA,_found_in_2005.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Morganite_from_Elizabeth_R_Mine_Pala,_San_Diego,_CA,_found_in_2005.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 14:24, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added Rationale. Gem-fanat (talk) 16:38, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France newsletter

[edit]
WikiProject France News

What's new?

[edit]
  • The project has recently experienced a complete redesign. The Outreach department has also undergone a major expansion, and this newsletter is the result of that.
  • The review department is currently under development, with several new proposals underway. Internal peer review had begun on the page of the project's Review Department. The department currently provides a centralized platform off all currently open reviews throughout the project (Featured Articles, Peer Reviews, Good Articles, Articles for Deletion, Categories for Discussion, etc.)
  • A new task force has been introduced: the Paris task force. Any users interested in contributing to the taskforce can join on the project page.
  • There is a current discussion about merging the French Communes WikiProject into ours. This communes project will be organised as a task force.
User-related news

Notifications

[edit]
Complete project tasks
Overview

This is the new project newsletter, covering months August through to October, which will contain information regarding new Good and Featured articles, recent project changes, general related news, and recent proposals.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject France. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the creation. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Articles
  • Five articles are currently undergoing external peer reviews:
  1. Louvre Abu Dhabi
  2. Louvre
  3. Family Moving Day
  4. Napoleon I
  5. List of Bellflower Bunny Episodes
  • Two articles have reached GA status this month:
Newsletter contributors

Thanks for your contributions to the project, Jordan Contribs 17:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zodiac stones

[edit]

You recently improved the referencing of Zodiac stones. Unfortunately, the reference you give for the Zodiac stone table is a birthstone list (by month) rather than Zodiac sign and does not exactly correspond - should the gem for the first 21 days of the sign be used or the latter part? You seem to have chosen the latter part (which has a smaller correspondence). Now people have started randomly changing entries again, but it is not clear from the ref whether they should be reverted or not. If we go back to the old ref that would at least make it clear, but I agree that your ref is more reliable. Waht to do, what to do . . . 10:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, if you do "Gem-fanat (talk) 17:28, 18 December 2008 (UTC)" you can sign your name ! Makes it a bit easier to talk :-) .. Anyway Zodiac is a redirect from Birthstone. So I'd need to check what the discussion behind that merger of articles was. Given what it is, I think Zodiac is perhaps not the proper title for it. I do think however it's more prudent to stick to birthstones especially with the redirect in mind. I will check it out during the holidays Gem-fanat (talk) 17:28, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not signing, well actually, I did sign but apparently I used five tildes instead of four which interestingly just puts in the time and date without the name. The history of the article is that it was originally at Birthstone but was subsequently merged with Birthday. An editor at "birthday" decided it was not wanted and deleted it. Although the material was in pretty poor shape at the time (now much improved) I did not think that it should be deleted altogether so I re-inserted it at Zodiac stone (only later discovering the original location). Anyway, I don't think the history or the page name is important, the key point to my mind is that table in the lede is for a Zodiac calendar and should have a reference to Zodiac stones. The references are fine for the subsequent birthstone calendars but will not do for that first one. SpinningSpark 10:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Another issue is that the Mystical and Ayurvedic lists were in the old Timewell reference but are not in the new references. SpinningSpark 11:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, we need to check this properly. Give me some time and feel free to make changes if you think it's an improvement ! Gem-fanat (talk) 22:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour!

[edit]

Hi Gem-fanat, you could be the one who might ask the Wiki.en gentlemen to whitelist my URL www.realgems.org. Since December 2008 Vsmith & Co. (USA) have deleted all my external links so that all gemstone-interested Wiki users worldwide (! - except Germany) cannot find my collection of faceted gemstones (and their rough versions) any more... From July 2008 until December 2008 all my link additions (to my own, educational and non-profit) were not regarded as spam!!!

I have sent this message also to User:SauliH. —Preceding unsigned comment added by F.N. Berg (talk • contribs) 20:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since a few days I have followed the instruction of a Wiki admin to create something worthy for Wikipedia so that my URL can be whitelisted again. So I created these articles on German Wiki BECAUSE GERMAN WIKI HAS WHITELISTED MY URL BECAUSE THEY HAVE SEEN THAT MY COLLECTION OF MORE THAN 2000 IMAGES IS WORTH BEING LINKED AT WIKIPEDIA: Tugtupite, Jeremejevite, Benitoite and added some data to Red Beryl. What else can I do to reach a worldwide whitelisting?

What do you think asking at least your French administration to whitelist my links on Wiki France?

A votre santé, Mike / Realgems.org F.N. Berg (talk) 20:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mike,

The problem is that according to Wiki guidelines you cannot keep adding your own external links, certainly not in the external links section for several reasons that have to do with "self promotion", or "spam", or "independence of authorship" and so on. Wiki is NOT a directory that should link to the "most interesting sites on topics A,B,C". It's an online encyclopedia that will make use of external sources (or so it should) that are considered reliable, scientific (depending on the topic), independent and objective. Whilst that is a monstrous task in itself, it will cloud the discussion completely if a judgement has to be made about "interesting sites" to add.

There is especially a problem when the owner of that site starts to link to him/herself, and does this in a consistent, spammy way. I am not saying you are, but you sure indicate that you added your links everywhere to tell the world about your site. That's about as bad as it can get...

I think we're all aware of the website now, so let nature run its course and see if it gets picked up by people other than yourself to be used as a reference website. Gem-fanat (talk) 20:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kasaalaan child labour links on diamond page

[edit]

I have to thank you for discussing changes on the diamond page which I do watch very closely ;-) That said, I have no objection against deleting those links (not mine actually). Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 12:07, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to modify diamond as you wish, within the usual guidelines (no POV, appropriate references, etc). Actually, I did not wish to work on diamond, "my" diamond articles were synthetic diamond, and a few others. Diamond was too non-scientific for me, but I got involved in rescuing an almost inevitable FA delisting of it, thats why so many edits of mine there. Some chapters there are not up to the standards (geology, perhaps mining, etc.). Materialscientist (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Child labour in diamond industry

[edit]
  • Human Rights Watch Child Labor News
  • "Child Labour in the Diamond Industry". International Labour Organization. 1997.
  • "Children working in Sierra Leone mines". BBC news. August 28, 2003. During Sierra Leone's 10 year civil war, children were used as combatants and labourers in the diamond mines of Koidu in the north-eastern district of Kono. ... The children aged between seven and 16 go to the mines as early as 08.00 and work through to 18.00. They do hard labour, like digging in soil and gravel, before sifting with a pan for gemstones and shifting heavy mud believed to contain diamonds. ... The ministry of gender and children affairs, in collaboration with non-governmental organisations, World Vision and Aim Sierra Leone, have registered 1,200 child miners, with the aim of taking them out of the mines.
  • "Diamonds Are Forever, But Not The Lives Of Child Workers". November 2006. Mines in South Africa and India are notorious locations of various sweatshops that produce exquisite diamonds that were made by the hands of child slaves. Diamonds are symbols of love, dedication and wealth. To young couples, a diamond ring is the perfect gift to the woman you love. The bigger the diamond, the more a man loves his woman. These gems do not come cheap though. A one eighth cut; round diamond solitaire promise ring in 10K gold alone costs two hundred and twenty-nine dollars. However, an extravagant gift such as this ring does come at a higher price; the price of blood and health. Child slaves have suffered to make a diamond which is overpriced and funded for wars. The question is, "is it worth buying a small gem that slaves worked arduously for"? Diamond mines are first and foremost a dangerous work site. These mines are nothing more than open pits of heavy minerals, oil, machinery exhaust, and any other rubbish seeps into.

"Child Labour in the Diamond Industry" by International Labor Organization or BBC article are clearly relevant, you may add environment links too if you like. You may read guidelines again, all the WP:RS links are relevant, date doesn't change the case since child labour issues haven't improved during 1997-2009, if you like you may research for better links and add them too. External links used for expanding, then they may removed when an article section developed for the case. I have no tolerance for any kind for removal of directly relevant information. Child labour is a known issue in the diamond industry, try not to hide the facts. Kasaalan (talk) 21:46, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Working Order

[edit]

Made the following change http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Gemology_and_Jewelry_Wikipedians%27_notice_board/Complete_to-do&oldid=312777165

I do not know how things are organized at Wikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry. I added the article Ratna Pariksha under Todos. Do not know if that is what you all expected. If I notice an uncovered article, how do I start with it?Ganesh J. Acharya (talk) 06:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I would try to use the templates for using/quoting sources.. it is a standard method and in this way you don't have these very long url's after quoting the text.. Gem-fanat (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Berringa Birthday Mine.jpg

[edit]

File:Berringa Birthday Mine.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Berringa Birthday Mine.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Berringa Birthday Mine.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agate ref

[edit]

Could you provide a bit more about the reference used in Chalcedony#Agate? "CIBJO, Retailers Reference guide, May 2009" - publisher, notability etc. Vsmith (talk) 14:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, just did. Gem-fanat (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 02:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: deletion valid reference on gemstone page

[edit]

Re your message: That's fine. Feel free to put the external link back in. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:30, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: No need to wait. =) Put the link back in as it's fine with me. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Farlang

[edit]

What is your connection with farlang.com? You seem to be quite determined to have links to it, reverting several people who have removed them. Guy (Help!) 10:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

None. I have been editing Wikipedia since 2007 and used their library since that time as well as others such as Mindat or webmineral. Just like other editors in the field have used mindat.org or webmineral.com or amethyst galleries which is a e-commerce site or other commercial and non commercial sites which btw I have used as well. Gems, jewelry, minerals etc. is a very specific niche after all, and that's my specialization and those are the sources generally used Vsmith knows which libraries I use and so do other editors in the field and you can ask them. The library has no advertizing, is not commercial, no original work and all relevant and scientific sources. Whether a commercial site or not is irrelevant or else we can take out most of the external links and references :-) Gem-fanat (talk) 20:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan gem page

[edit]

Here is a gem fanatic I was looking for :) Can you help me with this article, Gemstones of Pakistan. I have limited knowledge of gem mineralogy and you can help. Samar Talk 10:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mineral collecting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Halpern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Estate jewelry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Art Jewelry Forum

[edit]

Hello, I am working on a pet project to help digitize information about the field of metalsmithing+jewelry. I started with making a page for Art jewelry forum (AJF), and have a list of artists that I would like to make pages for as well. The AJF page has been nominated for deletion because it is questioned if the organization is "notable". I am reaching out to you because I saw that you edited some pages that relate to studio jewelry, and thought you may have an informed opinion (unlike the mathematician who nominated the page for deletion) about whether or not it is a "notable organization". If you have an opinion, one way or another, please way in on the articles for deletion discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Art_jewelry_forumClarefinin (talk) 20:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 08:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Gem-fanat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Gem-fanat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Gem-fanat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sybarite Jewellery

[edit]

Hello Gem-fanat, I've updated the Draft:Sybarite_Jewellery could you please review and approve it or write me what needs to be added. Thanks. Ostashevskiy (talk) 06:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of Estate jewelry for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estate jewelry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estate jewelry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gem-fanat&oldid=1233780668"