User talk:Ged UK/Archives/2016/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ged UK. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 2 May 2016
- In the media: Wikipedia Zero piracy in Bangladesh; bureaucracy; chilling effects; too few cooks; translation gaps
- Traffic report: Purple
- Featured content: The best ... from the past two weeks
Hitler's religious views
Hello
Sorry not sure how you do things, but I noticed you'd locked the Religious views of Hitler page. I thought I'd raise that the opening other than being grammatically wrong, is quite bias.
"The religious views of Adolf Hitler are a matter of debate, with a consensus of scholars agreeing that Hitler was not a Christian and was skeptical of religion generally."
If the views are a matter of debate there can't also be a consensus, there could be a majority of some degree but it can't be consensus if there are dissenting views.
can I suggest instead
"Adolf Hitler self identified as a catholic. However, they is a great deal of debate about the true nature of his religious.
I certainly wouldn't say he was a good christian! or that his christianity or not drove his views though the long held antisemitism of christianity was certainly an influence in the Shoah. I know in the US that there is effort among right wing christians to label Hitler an atheist and thus label all atheists as evil. I think to claim a consensus is a very strong claim to make on such a controversial issue without a source.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on the point.
Happy to discuss
Thanks
Jack — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.103.31 (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 May 2016
- Op-ed: Swiss chapter in turmoil
- In the media: Wikimedia's Dario Taraborelli quoted on Google's Knowledge Graph in The Washington Post
- Featured content: Two weeks for the prize of one
- Traffic report: Oh behave, Beyhive / Underdogs
- Arbitration report: "Wikicology" ends in site ban; evidence and workshop phases concluded for "Gamaliel and others"
- Wikicup: That's it for WikiCup Round 2!
Unprotect request
Can you unprotect my talkpage please. -- de Facto (talk). 18:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- You can forget this thanks, it's been done. -- de Facto (talk). 17:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Page Protection Request
Can you protect the following page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uhura. IP user keeps changing and won't discuss on talk page. Please forgive me if this is not the correct procedure to do this but I've never done this before. SonOfThornhill (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ya, can you please? Even though my edit improves the page and I did start a discussion on the other user's talk page which he deleted without responding to, and he hasn't given a single reason whatsoever why his less-than-stellar version should be forced to remain, and he's well over the 3RR and has a history of owning Star Trek-related pages and like please! Can you help him out so the page can be crappy again! Lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.43.245 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- This unregistered editor, using multiple IPs, changed article based only on his or her opinion without any sources cited. They have also failed to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. And has resorted to childish insults as well as harassment. Sorry that this mess has spilled on to your Talk page. SonOfThornhill (talk) 13:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2016
- News and notes: Upcoming Wikimedia conferences in the US and India; May Metrics and Activities Meeting
- Special report: Compensation paid to Sue Gardner increased by almost 50 percent after she stepped down as executive director
- Featured content: Eight articles, three lists and five pictures
- Op-ed: Journey of a Wikipedian
- Arbitration report: Gamaliel resigns from the arbitration committee
- Recent research: English as Wikipedia's Lingua Franca; deletion rationales; schizophrenia controversies
- Traffic report: Splitting (musical) airs / Slow Ride
Wiki Loves Pride 2016
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
- Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
- Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
- Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)