User talk:Gbolahanpost

Muiz Banire

Hi, Please include a citation to a reliable source for each claim you add. Otherwise, you additions can, and will, be deleted. Thanks. Rentier (talk) 10:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adegoke Rasheed Adekunle

Hello Gbolahanpost,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adegoke Rasheed Adekunle for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:53, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alex Omokudu

Hi. I have moved the article-to-be to Draft:Alex Omokudu since it was not yet ready for main space. Specifically, the (excessive amount of) inline external links is a problem. Good luck. Kleuske (talk) 15:59, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex OmoKudu (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:

There are spammy external links within the content. Remove and rewrite to suit neutral point of view

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex OmoKudu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alex OmoKudu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 09:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gbolahanpost! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 09:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alex Omokudu

Hello, Gbolahanpost. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alex Omokudu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! MrClog (talk) 19:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mustapha Mona Audu

The article Mustapha Mona Audu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NPOLITICIAN. If content about Mustapha can be properly integrated into the article about Abubakar Audu, then it would be appropriate to create a redirect from this title pointing to there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OKUNOREN TWINS (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OKUNOREN TWINS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OKUNOREN TWINS, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (^talk) 07:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:OKUNOREN TWINS

Hello, Gbolahanpost. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OKUNOREN TWINS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio warning

Hello Gbolahanpost! Your additions to Femi Babafemi have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Modussiccandi (talk) 11:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Femi Babafemi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Femi Babafemi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, it appears you have a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not move the article into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rhesus solution initiative

The article Rhesus solution initiative has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Okunoren Twins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Okunoren Twins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Okunoren Twins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 05:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muiz Banire

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muiz Banire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://nairametrics.com/2018/07/17/buhari-appoints-muiz-banire-as-amcon-chairman/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 07:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Femi Babafemi

Hello, Gbolahanpost. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Femi Babafemi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taeillo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Taeillo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 23:21, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taeillo has been accepted

Taeillo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Princess of Ara 19:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Gbolahanpost. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Tosin Osunkoya, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 12:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I would like to clarify that the article on Tosin Osunkoya was created with the intent of providing accurate and verifiable information about his career and achievements. To the best of my knowledge, no undisclosed payments were made for the creation or editing of this article.

However, I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, particularly regarding neutrality and the disclosure of any conflicts of interest. I am committed to ensuring that the article complies with Wikipedia's content policies.

If there are specific sections that require improvement or if there are any issues with neutrality, I would appreciate detailed feedback so that appropriate edits can be made. I am willing to work collaboratively to ensure that the article meets Wikipedia's standards.

Thank you for your guidance and for helping maintain the quality and integrity of Wikipedia. Gbolahanpost (talk) 09:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who do you mean by "our"? And what's your connection with Tosin Osunkoya please? Wikishovel (talk) 09:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous use of "our." I meant to speak from my own perspective. To clarify, I am the one who has been involved in editing the article on Tosin Osunkoya.

I first became acquainted with Tosin Osunkoya when I was researching Comercio Partners for a separate Wikipedia article I published. During that process, I came across Tosin's and his other partners contributions to the field and felt it was important to create an accurate and well-rounded article about him as well. I have no personal or professional relationship with him or his partners.

My connection with Tosin is purely based on this research, and my goal has always been to provide unbiased, verifiable information. I fully respect Wikipedia's content policies and am committed to ensuring that the article aligns with them.

Thank you for pointing this out. I am more than willing to make any necessary adjustments to maintain the integrity of the article. Gbolahanpost (talk) 09:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All of your edits this year have been about Comercio Partners and their employees. You've also uploaded posed photographs, such as the one of Tosin Osunkoya, as your own work. What's your connection with Comercio Partners please? Wikishovel (talk) 13:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never knew that was an issue, should i remove? Gbolahanpost (talk) 07:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you should explain what your connection is with Comercio Partners please. Wikishovel (talk) 09:16, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Nnamdi Nwizu, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Gbolahanpost, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gbolahanpost|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Wikishovel (talk) 21:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nnamdi Nwizu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nnamdi Nwizu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nnamdi Nwizu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 04:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tosin Osunkoya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tosin Osunkoya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ednabrenze (talk) 05:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]