User talk:Gbisback

Speedy deletion of "Kevin Michael discography"

A page you created, Kevin Michael discography, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kevin Michael discography has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 22:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Missy Elliot TAO New York 10th Anniversary - Oct 2013.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Missy Elliot TAO New York 10th Anniversary - Oct 2013.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images

I've have to delete the images you uploaded today. All of them were missing the appropriate licensing information about their sources. More importantly, even if the copyright information had been provided, they would have violated our main polices about images: WP:IUP and WP:NFCC.—Kww(talk) 23:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Corey-Jackson Carter has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Corey-Jackson Carter was changed by Gbisback (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952542 on 2016-04-24T18:37:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Corey-Jackson Carter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mtpaley (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Corey-Jackson Carter, you may be blocked from editing. Mtpaley (talk) 18:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Corey-Jackson Carter. Mtpaley (talk) 18:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop vandalising! Mtpaley (talk) 18:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Corey-Jackson Carter. Mtpaley (talk) 18:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you defending a fake page? You can easily match up every credit listed on his page and see that they are fraudulant. This person is a fraud. I will have an admin look into your actions and this page will be removed. --Mtpaley (talk)

Produce some citations with the edits but you need a citation for 'occupation = Professional Liar"' amongst many others which I suspect is not going to be easy to find. Mtpaley (talk) 19:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking into all the references anyway..... Mtpaley (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC) What about the www.digitalspy.com and www.linkedin.com references? ^[1] ^[2] Mtpaley (talk) 19:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They are completely fabricated. You can look at the true album credits on Billboard.com http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/7341787/beyonce-lemonade-album-features-the-weeknd-diplo-kendrick-lamar-more This guy is a fake, I know him in real life. That page needs to be deleted. He's trying to fool industry people into thinking he wrote all the songs he has listed. Look up any of those songs and you will know the truth.

I have added some research to Talk:Corey-Jackson_Carter and you can appeal the block if you want but regardless of the validity or not of your claims you will have to persuade the admins (maybe start with User:Widr) that edits such as this [1] are acceptable. Mtpaley (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On his talk page, the sources you listed are unreliable sources, and the discog source has been removed. He's not listed. Additionally, regular people/users can edit these sources at free will because none of them are from real publications. He's a fake. Thanks for looking into it, and I don't know how to appeal the block. Mtpaley (talk)

^ "digitalspy".
^ "linkedin".

[1] "digitalspy".

[2] "linkedin".

[1]

[2]