User talk:Gauravsinghmpi
July 2017
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.You were warned sufficiently about WP:OWN. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Gauravsinghmpi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
the block is no longer necessary because i understand why i am blocked , i will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions instead.
Accept reason:
Alright. Please work with the community. Use the article talk page to discuss changes. Please remember that you do not own the article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:12, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 14:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.You were warned sufficiently about WP:OWN. You were blocked for it. You requested an unblock with "...i will not do it again...". I unblocked you. Within hours, you did the same thing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Gauravsinghmpi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey frodesiak intially i don't know why i am blocked so when hayman correct my mistake than after that i was not done that mistake again and you can also see my talk page for help so please unblock me.Gauravsinghmpi (talk) 04:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Less than three hours after your unblock you went ahead with the same disruption, so wait this block out, read through the policies and guidelines and come back a better, more cooperative editor. —SpacemanSpiff 06:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
August 2017
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar. Muhandes (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
In fact, the content you added was copy pasted from here and other sites. Please remember that you must write in your own words. You cannot copy and paste from other websites. For further information, please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If you have questions, please ask.
Now, about your future edits in general: They must be sourced with references. If they are reverted for any reason, do not put them back. Use the article talk page instead to discuss things. If you add unsourced text again, you may be blocked from editing indefinitely without further notice. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
February 2018
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please don't add honorifics against MOS:DOCTOR Muhandes (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- Also, please don't add citations to headings, see WP:CITE. --Muhandes (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- Also, per WP:UNIGUIDE don't list courses. --Muhandes (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Gauravsinghmpi, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar. Muhandes (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Do you wish to be permanently blocked?
[edit]I thought two blocks would be enough but I see you have not learned anything. here you added data about admission without a source. Worst than that, here you added a bogus source to the section which doesn't mention the facts at all. Please stop. --Muhandes (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rec,Ambedkarnagar
[edit]
Hello, Gauravsinghmpi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rec,Ambedkarnagar".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar has a new comment
[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar (March 6)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Gauravsinghmpi!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chenzw Talk 06:46, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Nirmal contractors
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nirmal contractors, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 15:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nirmal contractors
[edit]Hello Gauravsinghmpi,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nirmal contractors for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Mr RD 11:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rskushwahabsp.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Rskushwahabsp.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 12:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 12:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Gauravsinghmpi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Earlier when was blocked i am a new user that time and trying to get knowing about wikipedia rules.But now i thought i should not be blocked again beacause now i am regularly working for wikipedia community and giving my contribution to the wikipedia.If you thought the article was wrong and should not be on wikipedia i am ready to remove it.But please unblock me so that i can again work for community not i will not do such thing again. Gauravsinghmpi (talk) 12:19, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:53, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sir,now i understand why i am blocked , actually i not copied the content.But actually i was not uploaded it by the particular path i will not do such thing again and contribute to the community.So,please unblock me. Gauravsinghmpi (talk) 13:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Gauravsinghmpi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
so sir please unblock me
Decline reason:
Editors who lack understanding as to why they are blocked are doomed to repeat the same errors. You will need to demonstrate a thorough understanding of how your editing led to you being blocked, multiple times, in order for an unblock to be considered.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gauravsinghmpi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am indefinitly block on Eng wikipedia for sock puppetry & on simple wikipedia for edit warring. I already request at english & simple wikipedia but they have rejected my request. I am completely changed now & able to understands the all rules of wikipedia. I am currently editing on urwiki and my edits are highly constructive, you can ask from any Bureaucrat of urwiki Gauravsinghmpi (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have failed to do as you have been asked and give a thorough understanding of the reasons you have been blocked and tell what productive contributions you intend to make. I am declining this request. I think your only pathway back at this point would be the standard offer in six months. If you make another unblock request that simply restates your previous ones, you risk your ability to edit this page being removed. 331dot (talk) 20:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@SpacemanSpiff: Gauravsinghmpi (talk) 17:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Gauravsinghmpi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
plz unblock bcz now i understand the thing and try to contribute to community
Decline reason:
Saying, "I get it," is not the same as actually getting it. You need to explain, in your unblock appeal, what you now understand that you didn't before. Why were you blocked? Which polices were applicable? What do those policies say (in your own words)? Why was your behaviour in violation of these policies? What do you plan to do to make sure the same problems don't happen again? What sorts of edits will you make if we unblock you? You will need to provide competent answers to these questions if you expect us to rescind the block. Yunshui 雲水 10:31, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gauravsinghmpi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Now ,i understand the A 7 policy of indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events) and other so i want that you will unblock meGauravsinghmpi (talk) 05:48, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but your unblock request is unconvincing for many of the same reasons that your previous unblock requests were unconvincing. I am revoking your ability to edit this talk page. I strongly suggest you take up our standard offer; you may use WP:UTRS to request unblock. Mz7 (talk) 08:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your draft article, Draft:Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar
[edit]Hello, Gauravsinghmpi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 09:28, 6 September 2018 (UTC)