User talk:Gaurav456

Welcome!

Hello, Gaurav456, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Y8.com, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Y8.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Y8.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Y8 Games

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Y8 Games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Charlie the Pig (talk) 03:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Y8 Games

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Y8 Games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Mr X 12:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kautilya Pandit has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kautilya Pandit was changed by Gaurav456 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946905 on 2015-10-23T13:38:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kautilya Pandit, you may be blocked from editing. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 13:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kautilya Pandit. ⁓ Hello 71 13:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Draft:Gaurav Adhikari. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaurav adhikari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gaurav adhikari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bharatiya29 (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Gaurav adhikari. You have already created several inappropriate articles that met the WP:CSD, so you should know not to do this. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself

Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.

The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia; also, you should read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors, particularly the section headed "Your safety and security". It is not wise for young people to post too much detail about themselves on the Internet; Wikipedia is concerned to keep them safe, so for that reason, I have deleted what you wrote in your sandbox. JohnCD (talk) 14:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaurav Adhikari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gaurav Adhikari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf (talk) 02:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nepaliarticles, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Wgolf (talk) 02:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ban evasion

User has repeatedly engaged in WP:EVADE to get around their ban. For example, in November 2018. --Yamla (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC) This user has engaged in cross-wiki harassment. --Yamla (talk) 06:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the story How was I banned

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaurav456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There are many editors on wikipedia and lots of them had created many accounts and used them as a bot, and other alternate account to give some benefit to Wikipedia. But the Story of Me is Different. First time I opened up the wikipedia was about 5-6 years before where I was told by my teacher to prepare speech on Planets and Its Satelites. I searched for Jupiter, Saturn, Moon and I found there the mistake which I have forgotten now!! I edited and the edit was reviewed so on. I was happy with positive feedback and I become more interested in the use of wikipedia. I was unknown of all the rules and regulation as I was banned By User:NeilN. And I became unhappy!! Afterthat, I made another account not knowingly that I can appeal for request and I didn't saw expiry date. I was doing well but I deleted a wikipedia and I was blocked. Doing this continiously I caught my account with sock puppet. And I didn't knew that I did so many mistakes that other people's account(which I don't know who were they) also became victim of sock puppetry with my account. They message me in my e-mail about that giving big foul statements. But I did forgot my password! I wasn't able to recover my g-mail and wikipedia password and tried using other different account that I had created and Yamla suggested to request unblock with this account. And today I opened wikipedia just trying "password" as the password and miracle happend and I thought to do this. Many admins will think that I am useless and I will not give my effort to contribute Wikipedia then Why would I give continious effort to be an wikipedian. And If still I will be regraded as useful then, In the world, 1 thing will be impossible (That I can't be a good wikipedian). If possible, review all the works that I have done and review this request and that's all. I am hoping for Yamla see's things from a positive and my view. Hope he/she understands me. Thank You!! Gaurav 11:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time per Yamla above. Please try again in 6 months if you can refrain from block evasion for that long. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Waited too long with no contributions!!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaurav456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Explaining all the thoughts in previous request, I came up requesting again. This is my last time requesting to contribute towards Wikipedia. My is mistake is only highlighted, where are my contribution. Okay! Stay Cool, Think Cool & Wise. Gaurav 08:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This neither addresses the issues raised above, nor does it follow the instructions you have been given. Huon (talk) 08:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaurav456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I waited too long as Dlohcierekim said. Explaining all the thoughts in previous request, I came up requesting again. This is my last time requesting to contribute towards Wikipedia. My is mistake is only highlighted, where are my contribution. Okay! Stay Cool, Think Cool & Wise. Gaurav 08:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It has not been six months since your last request, and that's without checking to see if you have socked again. You now must wait 6 months from today, which would be October 1st. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

He's socked again. See NotTfue123 (talk · contribs · count).--Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]