User talk:Garyallen262

This is Garyallen262's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Allen, runner (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No explicit references have been provided although some text links to external web-sites but it is unclear whether or how these assert any notability for the subject. Please read WP:GNG and, if possible, please structure any references in a way consistent with other Wikipedia articles so that it is possible to work out what is being used to attest to notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Allen, runner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Garyallen262, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography

It looks very much as if you are writing an autobiography. Please read WP:Autobiography to understand why that might be a very bad idea. Thanks Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notable submission not currently available on wiki Thank you Thank You Thanks Garyallen262 (talk) 23:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no it isn't. Please read WP:GNG for an overview of what constitutes notability. For what it is worth, I have fixed up one of your references to make it look like a Wikipedia article but as this appears to be an interview reported by a local source, it wouldn't, in my view, count towards notability. May I suggest that you update all your refs so that the next reviewer has an easier job. Articles that are easy to read with easily understood references have a better chance of success than those that are poorly structured. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gary Allen, runner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gary Allen, runner. Thanks! Delta13C (talk) 06:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Allen, runner (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

Please cleanup the article. Write full sentences instead of dot points and include the 10 references that are just there but not included.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Allen, runner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Allen, runner (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still nothing to suggest the needing convincing substance for independent notability, I would not resubmit as there's unlikely better.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Allen, runner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garyallen262 (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the article per Delta13C Instructions and input below. Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: This guy appears to be notable given the amount of coverage he has received. At first I thought the article was suffering from being notable for one event, but then noticed that media sources have covered him for other achievements. My misinterpretation was to blame on the very poor referencing style and organization. Please fix these issues promptly; read this. Delta13C (talk) 06:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Allen, runner (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous problems still apply.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Allen, runner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 19:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gary Allen, runner

Hello, Garyallen262. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gary Allen".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, Garyallen262. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Gary Allen (runner), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 19:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing this informative information. Very helpful and appreciated knowledge. Garyallen262 (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]