User talk:Ganeshjadhav0808

Investica moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Investica, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Please also note that as an employee of the company you are writing about, you have a clear conflict of interest. Please review our policies on WP:COI and WP:PAID, and take the appropriate steps.GirthSummit _(blether) 14:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further information

Hi - I wanted to give you a bit more information about the problems with the article. There are two issues - the first is sourcing and notability, the second is your conflict of interest.

Sourcing and notability Please review the guidelines for establishing notability of companies and products at WP:NCORP. You will see that to establish notability, we require significant coverage in multiple independent, secondary, reliable sources. Your article contained three sources - these were all simply references to the same company press release (which was quoted word for word in all three articles). Sources like this are explicitly excluded from establishing notability per WP:ORGIND - coverage needs to be independent, not based on press releases.

COI Issues As an employee of Choice India (as declared on your userpage), you have a clear conflict of interest with this subject. As you will see at the WP:COI and WP:PAID pages, there are steps that you must take when writing about a subject like this. There are several steps you need to take, but first and foremost you need to go through the WP:AfC process when creating new articles; there are also certain declarations you need to make on your talk page, making your COI with this particular subject clear. Note - it's not sufficient just to say you work for the parent company - you need to disclose your specific COI with this article, since you have been working on it, in case other editors might miss that the product described in the article is owned by the company you work for.

I hope that's clear - let me know if you have any questions. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 15:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the points above, please ensure you are complying with WP:PAID.--SamHolt6 (talk) 17:40, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ganeshjadhav0808:, you have made no attempt to address the COI concern listed above, and have continued to edit. If you continue to fail to communicate, I can say that your account will likely be blocked.--SamHolt6 (talk) 12:42, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Investica (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Investica and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Investica, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 17:37, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ganeshjadhav0808! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 17:37, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Investica (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining; the addition of one source (a standard business announcement) since the last decline does not assuage doubts concerning WP:NCORP. In addition, the draft has likely been created contrary to WP:NOT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Investica and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Investica, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 12:38, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Investica concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Investica, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Choice Broking

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Choice Broking, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 15:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ganeshjadhav0808, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ganeshjadhav0808|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Choice Broking

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Choice Broking requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JamesG5 (talk) 08:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for paid editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. kingboyk (talk) 09:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ganeshjadhav0808 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't understand your user guidelines for Wikipedia page creation. It's too difficult understand each term and conditions. Kindly request you to unblock me. Ganesh Jadhav (talk) 05:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

{I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. As you do not understand where you went astray, it would be foolhardy and futile to unblock you. You must be able to tell us how you went wrong and how you will avoid those problems.-- Deep fried okra 05:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.