User talk:Gamesofwikithrones

Welcome!

Hello, Gamesofwikithrones, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Morocco World News, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 11:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page is not about me, it was not my first edit, I have fixed list of magazines in Morocco and newspapers too, this newspaper wasn't included in those lists. While I have been reading this publication for years and it is only professional and reliable English online newspaper of Morocco. Similar newspapers are mentioned on the list I mentioned above, check those lists. The Morocco World News was a must inclusion for completing those lists. I plan to contribute more on media related articles and that is why I choose this as first, the Morocco World News has been verified by Facebook and has blue badge on Facebook, so the information is highly verifiable and also it has news about Morocco World news on Al Jazeera, ibtimes and others. Gamesofwikithrones (talk) 19:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't currently think the page needs to be deleted, but it does need to better indicate how this paper is notable per notability guidelines. Currently, the article does little more than state that the paper exists. 331dot (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On the main list of newspapers in Morocco, this link http://m.onlinenewspapers.com/morocco.htm has been used as reference and on this list Morocco World News exisits but it wasn't on Wikipedia, so I added it, I hope this fulfils you're notability required and other references that I have provided meanwhile, I'll add more references to the page. Gamesofwikithrones (talk) 04:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What you need are some more stories like the IBT story, explaining how the paper has "significant coverage in secondary sources", which must go beyond mere mentions, some text in the article explaining the content of that story would help(as to why the paper was created) Please review the notability guidelines for what is being looked for. 331dot (talk) 07:13, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand it but I think it should apply to all page under same titles like page "Morocco Mirrot" approved page has half the reference in comparison and if we check MWN it has been used to verify lot of other significant pages about morocco on Wikipedia as source (primary) the issue is it is itself a source and other newspapers dont carry news about rival news houses they see it as competition, what is note worthy is it has been publishing since 2011 and has covered almost all news about morocco and MENA region that is verified by looking at the website and it's viewership is clear. he point is the notability is itself justified as the page is highly verifiable and Ibtimes has written indepth about and has give it prime space. and if you check morocco mirror it has ceased publication but still was approved as the inclusion is not for purpose of just information but also preserving history on wikipedia that such and such newspaper existed and give over all accurate list of online or offline newspapers and Morocco World Newspaper cannot be excluded from the list, as it would be very important for people to have complete information. please suggest how to added the required sources apart from newspapers carrying news about newspaper, while MWN has been used as source by many international appers I can add that if you ask that to be included here: Al Arabiya ^[1] Washington Post ^[2] and many more these great publications wont take news from a newspaper unless it is reliable and notable newspaper. one more here ^[3] Gamesofwikithrones (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is probably enough there for now, at least. Thanks for your work 331dot (talk) 21:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Peer Viqar Ul Aslam

Hello, Gamesofwikithrones,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Peer Viqar Ul Aslam should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peer Viqar Ul Aslam .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Domdeparis (talk) 15:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peer Viqar Ul Aslam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peer Viqar Ul Aslam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peer Viqar Ul Aslam (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 15:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What I have included is this journalists byline to authenticate that he is a Journalist, apart from other sources, and in news events are related to people and organisations, that's how it works, I can't understand your reasons for afd tag while the Journalists has more than 20 references added to the page, he has won two major state awards, worked extensively in social work domain. It's not a vanity page, I add Journalism related pages, and wiki is source of information, justifying your option so harshly is not good. Please consider google search to locate more references as I can't add hundred more references.

Managing conflicts of interest

Hello, Gamesofwikithrones. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Peer Viqar Ul Aslam, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No relation with the subject, but I am sure the afd doesn't apply to this page. Anyway I will leave it to the discussion till then I will stop all further contributions. Gamesofwikithrones (talk)

Personal threats

The threat you made to both myself and kashmiri on the discussion page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peer Viqar Ul Aslam (2nd nomination) is not acceptable. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, in which politeness and the assumption of other editors' good intentions is vital in order to ensure everyone can feel welcome to contribute constructively to the building of an international online encyclopedia. Please acquaint yourself with the pages Wikipedia:Etiquette and Wikipedia:Assume good faith and be mindful of your language when interacting with fellow Wikipedians. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~dom Kaos~ kashmiri dom Kaos I did not mean to offend you, or threaten Kashmiri, i simply wanted to say that being held at a gun point is a very tough situation and in Kashmir it can mean something very dangerous, but i would still apologize for any the irresponsible words i used, i hope you both forgive me and help me build good content, I assure you i am trying my best to learn and make good changes and edits here. Please help and guide me, i hope you understand i didnt mean to offend you guys or threaten you. Gamesofwikithrones (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Morocco World News

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Morocco World News requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — kashmiri ^TALK 20:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Morocco World News for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morocco World News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morocco World News until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:27, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of multiple accounts

Given the amount of time that has past since the last edit from Thewikisquad, I'm prepared to assume good faith that you started using this account for some legitimate reason like forgetting your password. However, when changing accounts like this, you are expected to disclose the link to your previous account in order to ensure continuity. In particular, editing the project space from an undisclosed alternate account is prohibited. Please post note on the user page of each account indicating that they are alternative accounts for the same person. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have lost access to that account long ago, so I'm using this account now, I had done considerable edits from that account too, but wish to continue from only this account, thank you! Gamesofwikithrones (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please also help my edits here, everything I do is put under tags, I work so hard and I have so many pages to create but I can't when previous work is stopped despite 20+ references while pages with just 2-3 references are not tagged, please everyone be helpful, I am willing to learn more and be part of wiki community. I have no issues with the respected admins, but I wish they also respect my hard work. Sir Sputnik, please check the pages I created and the tabs on them, I will be thankful. Gamesofwikithrones (talk) 19:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Save the Eyes Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Save the Eyes Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save the Eyes Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sarvesh Tiwari moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sarvesh Tiwari, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 14:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sarvesh Tiwari has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sarvesh Tiwari. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 08:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 15:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gamesofwikithrones (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no credible evidence cited for the block, just based on mere assumption I can't be blocked from editing here. I was inactive for a while and thought to catch up on the old edits, if the references don't prove his notability I will withdraw the edit, and never post again. The person is highly notable figure and has represented on various national and international media channels. please review the article based on wikipedia criteria instead of the blanket ban. Gamesofwikithrones (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gamesofwikithrones (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, I will in future strictly adhere to wikipedia norms. I want to continue my contributions for wikipedia. Gamesofwikithrones (talk) 20:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Everyone says they will strictly follow Wikipedia norms or policies. No one actually expects that(as there are a lot of norms and policies, I haven't read them all and I have the admin tools). What we do want is for you to demonstrate your understanding of this matter by telling us what you did wrong, what steps you will take to not do it again in the future, and describe the productive contributions you will make(such as what articles or topic areas you will edit in). As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gamesofwikithrones (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will do the following - 1: I will read all the Wikipedia rules and norms. 2: I will not work on pages or articles that were stopped or placed under review. 3: I will not create articles about personalities until I have gained credibility. 4: I will learn from other contributors who have experience on Wikipedia by regularly checking newly approved articles. 5: Consider my work so far, I've approved articles. Gamesofwikithrones (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request does not improve on the prior one. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Peer Viqar Ul Aslam

Hello, Gamesofwikithrones. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peer Viqar Ul Aslam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peer Viqar Ul Aslam

Hello, Gamesofwikithrones. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peer Viqar Ul Aslam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:19, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://english.alarabiya.net/en/variety/2014/08/26/No-Burkinis-Morocco-hotels-ban-halal-swimsuit.html

[2] ttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/07/28/seven-year-old-girl-dies-after-elephant-throws-stone-in-morocco-zoo/

[3] ttp://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/1.729805

[1]

[2]

[3]