User talk:Games Junn

CyberGhostface

Thank you for your message about suspected IP socking by CyberGhostface. It looks so much like it that I have blocked the IP and increased the length of the named account's block. It was really interesting to see how the IP made defences against charges that had not even been made. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:11, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

np bloke. He's admitting to it now too so alls well that ends well.Games Junn (talk) 23:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Back By End Of Summer

Games Junn is away on vacation and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Leavin now for the airport, see some of you in New Zealand!--Be back by end of summer mates! forward inquiries to my email for those of U who knos me, be it touch

Trout

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

-) — DocOfSoc • Talk • 06: 29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Back in the states

Back from New Zealand. Working at a polling firm as a gopher. Reach me in the usual places, pals.Games Junn (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ghriscore, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. GoneIn60 (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this here? Explain please.Games Junn (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whacked. Unsure how to defend myself against the charge. Read the accusation. The reasoning's based on anecdotal observation and correlation. Correlation doesn't equal causation. Will appeal if blocked.Games Junn (talk) 15:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking into this I found you can perform an IP check in part and parcel of your investigation? That would clear this up. Don't dare edit the accusation page for fear of being accused of vandalism.Games Junn (talk) 15:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can reach me here if you need me.Games Junn (talk) 16:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will be gone for the remainder of the day.Find me tomorrow.Games Junn (talk) 18:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC) It would be appreciated if others would chat with me here rather than make backhanded remarks on the other talk pages. I'm on a lunch break. You can reach me now.Games Junn (talk) 19:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Batman v Superman

Your edits at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice are not helping efforts by other editors to reach a consensus on the article's talk page. If you continue to engage in reverting other editor contributions before a consensus is reached, then the behavior can be considered disruptive and may be reported.

Please discuss the matter with the editors at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 23:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Games Junn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]