User talk:GamerOfChaos

Welcome!

Hello, GamerOfChaos! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions @ 01:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

November 2015

Hello, I'm Liance. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Don't Threaten Me

I saw your little message on my talk page and am not at all scared by your threat. If you have an issue with an edit on the Godzilla 2014 article, then take it to the talk page, don't just go to my talk page and tell me to stop or you'll ban me. DON'T BE CHILDISH!!! I know my way around wiki's rules and guidelines and right now, you have absolutely no case to convince admins to ban me. I have done nothing wrong. I provided a source that literally states and support that the reactions to Godzilla 2014 were mixed to positive but you on the other-hand simply reverted my edit to an old edit without even explaining your edit or even citing sources that support your claims, which I guarantee the admins won't look kindly upon and it will look bad on you. If you're planning to revert my edit again, then you should provide a source that supports your claims (like I have, these are the sources I've provided that support the mixed to positive reaction claim, here, here, and here) or take your argument to the talk page first so we can discuss this civilly and come to an agreement but if you don't, then I will take action this time because this "reaction" issue is slowly turning into an edit war. Armegon (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Summary statements in film articles

Hello, GamerOfChaos. With this edit, you stated, "The movie has received praised at Rottentomatoes, but that doesn't speak for the rest of the world. Leave it as it 'has recieved positive reviews' and leave it at that." And with this edit, you stated, "When it comes to Wikipedia, we use rottentomatoes as the source, and the majority of the reviews were positive. I'm leaving it at generally positive reviews." Those are contradictory comments, and, for summary statements in our film articles, you are wrong that we only or primarily go by what Rotten Tomatoes has relayed. Read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film#Critical response. We also go by what the preponderance of WP:Reliable sources have stated about a film. You recently removed "overwhelmingly" from "positive reviews" at the The Force Awakens article when "overwhelmingly positive" is indirectly supported by Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic and directly supported by the sources right beside that sentence. We have been using "overwhelmingly positive" as a compromise for "critical acclaim" at that article. "Overwhelmingly positive" is also more accurate than just "positive" since the film received some negative reviews as well. You need to stop WP:Edit warring over matters like these, including with Armegon, and abide by what the sources state. You also need to keep WP:Consensus in mind, and should not mark edits like these as WP:Minor. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)