User talk:Gamachuiaaa
Gamachuiaaa, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Gamachuiaaa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC) |
False accusations
[edit]Mr editor
Just see how you removed the sources of California University without giving any reasons. I am not removing anything, I have just added the source there. RS6784 (talk) 10:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
According to the Archaeological Survey of India, Alha Udal belonged to the Ahir caste. [1][2] Gamachuiaaa (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Udal of Mahoba have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Udal of Mahoba was changed by Gamachuiaaa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883507 on 2021-09-12T11:00:08+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ◢ Ganbaruby! (talk) 22:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Pls don't revert or edit anything without starting debate on talk page
[edit]You are constantly doing disruptive editing on various pages without giving any reasons on talk page. RS6784 (talk) 08:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Community sanctions notification
[edit]--RegentsPark (comment) 21:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Yaduvanshi ahir's (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. RegentsPark (comment) 21:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC) |
- ^ }}
- ^ {{Cite web|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WCArAAAAYAAJ&q=alha+udal+ahir&pg=PA73%7Ctitle = Reports|last1 = India|first1 = Archæological Survey of|year = 1885