User talk:GalakStarscraper

January 2014

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hunter Moore, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 21:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC) [reply]

My apologies. I pushed the wrong button. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 21:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

At the afd you made clear that your purpose is to impact the reputation of a living person rather than to build an encyclopedia and your edits at the article are clear evidence that you wish to improperly utilize primary sources to achieve your ends. Stop it now. It is unacceptable. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I took your comments to heart and erased that information. I do not understand why if I took your comments and agreed with that the completely factual information is not allowed to be presented. You are deleted factual comments just because you took issue with my first comment which I tried to keep as factual as possible. I'm confused how I am the bad guy when I did what you asked me to do by cleaning up the comments. [[User talk:GalakStarscraper|3 November 2015)]

You are "the bad guy here" because you are attempting to utilize Wikipedia in a smear campaign against a living person. Wikipedia has zero use for "factual comments" created by stringing together primary source materials . We present what third party reliable sources have found noteworthy about the subject to createan encyclopedia article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]