User talk:Gagalandro
May 2018
[edit]
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in You and I (Lady Gaga song). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. —IB [ Poke ] 13:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:American Horror Story Apocalypse official poster.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:American Horror Story Apocalypse official poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is also goes for File:American Horror Story Apocalypse promotional poster.jpg TedEdwards 23:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:American Horror Story Apocalypse poster.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:American Horror Story Apocalypse poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
[edit] Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at American Horror Story: Apocalypse, you may be blocked from editing. —IB [ Poke ] 19:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
January 2019
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Always Remember Us This Way. —IB [ Poke ] 11:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Always Remember Us This Way, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB [ Poke ] 15:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —IB [ Poke ] 10:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Apparently you are saying that File:Lady Gaga - Always Remember Us This Way - cover.png is not the official cover. Please back up your claim with some evidence, preferably on the article's talk page. The current image has a source, although it is not a very high quality one, so you should come up with some supporting argument instead of just reverting. Edit warring can lead to blocks. —Kusma (t·c) 14:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Shallow (Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper song). —IB [ Poke ] 11:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Always Remember Us This Way while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Do you think I am not aware of you using your IP address 77.198.178.213 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to continue disrupting the article? —IB [ Poke ] 11:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Single Cover
[edit]Hello, I am sorry and I will not do it again. But the single cover that is shown on "Always Remember Us This Way" is not the official at all, it’s a fan-made cover and I don’t think Wikipedia usually shares that kind of unofficial informations. I don’t know how to remove it, but don’t worry I won’t try again. The only thing that you need to understand is this needs to stop and to be totally deleted from Wikipedia. This is a shame to show something as false, fake and wrong as this is on Wikipedia. It means that everybody can add whatever they want wherever they want. I beg you to delete this image from the page because this is not right. Thank you. Gagalandro (talk) 11:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit] This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lady Gaga discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB [ Poke ] 08:45, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Zach Villa
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Zach Villa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster talk 02:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. You've been warned before not to insert fabrications, now please refrain from those. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:28, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf(talk) 13:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)May 2020
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rain On Me (Lady Gaga song). Kylo Ren (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Your ignorance of MOS policies is tiring. Do it again, and you will be reported for it. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chromatica; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'll lay it out simple - until the RM is over, you do not edit war over the song titles at Chromatica. You do, you get blocked. Primefac (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
July 2021
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Erroneous information
[edit]Please stop disregarding the status of The Fame Monster as an extended play. It was not released as a separate studio album after The Fame. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
I mean I literally gave the source with each page from Gaga’s contract with Interscope. The lie that C2C is LG4 and TFM just an EP has been going around Wikipedia for years this has to be fixed. Her team and herself never called it an EP it was only Billboard and the streaming platforms that calls it that but otherwise every add for TFM, everything that has to do with the promo was focusing on "brand new album" and never acknowledged "EP". I’ve been trying to fix that for a long time but it’s you all’s issue now. As well as C2C doesn’t count as Gaga’s albums with Interscope therefore it’s not her fourth studio album. Gagalandro (talk) 17:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- "I would not add, nor take away any songs from this EP. It is a complete conceptual and musical body of work that can stand on its own two feet. It doesn't need The Fame."--Lady Gaga. This was already discussed 10 years ago. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Please use edit summaries
[edit]
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Please read the guidelines on what is generally considered to be a reliable source. Sricsi (talk) 17:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)