Jump to content

User talk:Gadfium/Archive 27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20←Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 28

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Administrator changes

added
removed
renamed Beeblebrox → Just Step Sideways

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Gadfium, how do you manage to revert edits so swiftly on New Zealand-related articles? is it by using the "Related changes" changes tool? Alexeyevitch(talk) 23:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

I have a huge watchlist, and I also use related changes.-gadfium 00:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Northcote and Glenfield North

Kia ora Gadfium, do you mind if Northcote Central and Northcote, Auckland are merged into a single article, similar to how Northcote Point was merged? I'm about to make an improved suburb article for Northcote, and having 2/3 articles for the same place feels like a major content fork.

Similarly, do you have strong feelings about Glenfield North remaining separated? Having just improved the Glenfield article, there doesn't seem to be much of a consistent identity/discourse about Glenfield North being distinct from Glenfield (compared to, say, how Te Atatū Peninsula and Te Atatū South are more distinct). --Prosperosity (talk) 01:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

@Prosperosity: Looking at the SA3 areas, which usually give a good indication of how suburbs map to SA2 areas: they have Northcote, which consists of Northcote Central, Akoranga, Northcote Tuff Crater and Northcote South, but Northcote Point is a separate SA3 which is identical to the SA2 of the same name. I'm happy for all five SA2 areas to be in a single article.
The Glenfield SA3 comprises Glenfield West, Glenfield South West, Glenfield Central, Glenfield East, Glenfield North and Wairau Valley, so I agree that Glenfield North should be merged into Glenfield, New Zealand, and you could consider adding Wairau Valley, Auckland as well, although it is industrial/commercial and the others are residential.-gadfium 02:01, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Great to hear, thanks! If I redirect the Glenfield North page now, would you be happy to merge the stats sections?
Wairau Valley has a distinct history, so I'm happy to have that as a separate article (Marlborough, however, is somewhere that might be good to merge into Glenfield - even after I improved the article, there was basically no content!) --Prosperosity (talk) 02:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
I agree with the merging of Marlborough into Glenfield. Will do the stats now.-gadfium 02:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I've merged the two Glenfields - would you be able to merge the stats sections here? I think I've done the infobox correctly. --Prosperosity (talk) 00:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
@Prosperosity I'm touring the South Island, in Hokitika tonight. Will do the stats when I'm home mid December.-gadfium 03:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
No worries! Hope you have a nice trip. --Prosperosity (talk) 03:32, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
I've also just merged Westlake into Takapuna. --Prosperosity (talk) 00:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Northcote and Takapuna done.-gadfium 00:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you so much! --Prosperosity (talk) 03:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
I have one more request (I think this is the last for a while!) - would you be able to do the North Shore, New Zealand demographics? I've worked out which statistical areas and meshblocks should be included, if that helps. --Prosperosity (talk) 03:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
I'll try to do that tomorrow. I don't have population figures for meshblocks, but often SA1 areas and meshblocks have the same boundaries, so I should be able to work with your list. This is going to be about twice as complicated as West Auckland was.-gadfium 04:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
North Shore demographics are done. I had to make a couple of changes to your statistical areas and meshblocks in the Okura Bush area. In translating from meshblocks to 2018 SA1 areas, MB 0178304 is part of SA1 7001928, but the SA1 also includes MB 4004005 to the east of Long Bay. I thought that was acceptable. However, MB 4011382 and 4011384, west of Ōkura settlement, are part of SA1 7001825, which includes a much larger area to the north, so I left that out.

Peter Lynn

Hi Gadfium, can you help me understand your perspective on keeping the info about Peter Lynn's father in the (currently unwieldy) page about him? Talk:Peter Lynn#Robert Frederick Lynn Retswerb (talk) 09:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Alexeyevitch(talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Alexeyevitch(talk) 11:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Rolleston, New Zealand

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rolleston, New Zealand, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Clyde Quay School and Community Emergency Hub

Hi G - I see you're having a few problems with User:Wetbeans too... I've been reverted several times on that article. I'm taking it gently because s/he's a fairly new editor, but I don't think s/he's learnt about WP:OWN yet. It's annoying to have correcting of formatting to WP standard reverted though... Grutness...wha? 11:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry, yes, I am a new editor, but I'm reverting the article because people keep deleting important parts of the article. Wetbeans (talk) 17:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
@Wetbeans: If you don't have suitable sources, then you can't demonstrate notability. Sports at primary school level would very rarely be considered important other than by people directly participating.-gadfium 17:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
@Wetbeans: If someone who later went on to become a notable sportsperson (or notable in any other field) attended the school, it would be worth having that in the article — and the same if a sports team from the school on a major trophy — but as Gadfium says, (almost) all primary schools have sports, so it's hardly an important item to mention. Grutness...wha? 02:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Clyde Quay School had been winning a sport competition, forgot what it was called, for almost 9 years in a row. I would've added that if anyone knew the name. Wetbeans (talk) 02:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
How is that school even notable? Or am I missing something? Schwede66 03:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
@Schwede66: It might be notable a little bit because of its age, its position very close to central Wellington, and being architect-designed. I suspect there would be many prominent NZers who attended, although I only see two names with What links here. That's probably because we don't usually note people's primary education in articles, and because "Clyde Quay School" was a redirect to the suburb until a couple of days ago. I wouldn't defend it against an AfD, but I wouldn't nominate it either.-gadfium 04:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Quite a few names turn up in searching for "Clyde Quay". I'll add a section to the article. Grutness...wha? 08:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
That's because Clyde Quay is a place in Te Aro, Wellington. Wetbeans (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Hibiscus Coast

Hello! Would you be able to add population stats to the Hibiscus Coast article? --Prosperosity (talk) 05:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

I made a start tonight, will follow up tomorrow.-gadfium 08:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
@Prosperosity:  Done-gadfium 00:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Could you add Stillwater and Waiwera to the demographics as well? --Prosperosity (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 Done-gadfium 02:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Localities without population data

Could I check if it's possible for you to add population data for Woodhill, Pākiri and Whakatīwai? --Prosperosity (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

@Prosperosity: If we take Woodhill as being on SH16 between Restall Road and Woodhill School, it falls between two SA1 areas: 7002133 which covers 24.80 square km, and 7001266 which covers 18.08. Both areas run west to the coast. If Woodhill also includes part of Kiwitahi Road, that's in 7001370 which covers 7.19. That's just over 50 square km, which might be too diffuse an area for a small locality.
Pakiri is simpler; Google Maps gives me a defined area and I'm familiar with the school/hall/church area and the beach. It's all covered by 7001150 which is 28.52 square km and a reasonable match for the Google Maps-defined area.
Whakatīwai is included in the Kaiaua rural settlement area. The appropriate SA1 is 7010813, covering 3.06 square km, running from Kaiaua School north to Wharekawa Marae, but not including Whakatīwai Regional Park. To include the park I would have to add 7010810 which is 45.40 square km. I think limiting it to 7010813 is more reasonable.
I'll do Pakiri and Whakatīwai this afternoon. If you think it is still appropriate to add Woodhill, let me know.-gadfium 02:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! That's a shame about Woodhill being so difficult to define - it's the only locality with a school in the Auckland Region that doesn't have a population statistic. --Prosperosity (talk) 04:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

2022 Wellington protest

Where are you getting your information about the Wellington protest? I was there. There were between 10,000 and 20,000 protestors. I should know because we had to feed them all.
It is you spreading misinformation. Everything you have said is a lie. Of course mainstream media is going to share untruths. NZ media can not be used as credible information. I can share drone footage with you if you like. Then you can count all the protestors yourself! 43.252.67.13 (talk) 06:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
@43.252.67.13 Read the cited sources. If you think there is a problem with New Zealand mainstream media then that is a you problem. —Panamitsu (talk) 06:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

  • Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
  • Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
  • Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
  • Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
  • Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
  • Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
  • Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
  • Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
  • Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
  • Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
  • Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
  • Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
  • Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
  • Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
  • Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
  • Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
  • Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

2a02:c7c::/32's block at AN

Hi Gadfium, I found 2a02:c7c::/32's block settings interesting enough to start a discussion about it; it's at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard § 2a02:c7c::/32 and your input would be welcome. I'm notifying everyone whose name appears in the block log as this is practically a review of a series of admin actions yours was a part of. I hope that, due to the amount of administrators who built the block to the current state, discussing this in a central location directly rather than asking everyone for input on their own talk page is okay. And perhaps there was a past discussion and this is completely unnecessary silliness of me; I apologize in advance if that's the case. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

20 years since First edit day!

Thanks to both of you. I wouldn't have noticed the anniversary otherwise.-Gadfium (talk) 00:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations indeed. Twenty years is rather steady! BTW, we missed you at the WikiCon; would have been great to catch up. Schwede66 05:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

Dear Gadfium/Archive 27,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, but I'll pass.-Gadfium (talk) 03:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Oban photos

Hi there. Regarding the removal of the apparent close duplicate photo of Oban in 1977. I would think that someone looking up Oban might actually appreciate a "then and now" pair of images. If having the images at the side unbalances the page layout would it be better to have them as a gallery at the end of the page instead? Cheers. Daveosaurus (talk) 08:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Feel free to create a gallery. See WP:GALLERY for the policy on galleries, which implicitly suggests a gallery may be appropriate when there is not "space for images to be effectively presented adjacent to text".-Gadfium (talk) 08:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. I haven't forgotten - I just haven't had a chance to do it yet. Will try to get to it some time in the next couple of weeks. Cheers. Daveosaurus (talk) 10:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Catherine Wedd More Information

Hi, would you be able to provide you more information on Catherine Wedd about more about her family and early life? His brother Jeremy is Intellectually disabled and non-verbal. Finally what town she was born in? Villian Factman (talk) 07:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

I haven't been an editor of this article, or its talk page, unless I'm missing something.-Gadfium (talk) 09:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Crimson Education Page

Hi Gadfium, would you mind taking a look at the Crimson Education talk page? I’ve posted a discussion there as requested, but I’m not sure if user Jack4576 is being unreasonable or if my points are actually biased. An admin’s input would surely be helpful. 47.63.202.171 (talk) 13:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Nyttend
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed Nihonjoe

CheckUser changes

readded Joe Roe

Oversight changes

removed GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Pepeha

Hi G,

I've just created a stub for the Māori concept of pepeha. Could you have a look to make sure I haven't made too many stuff-ups on it please? :) Grutness...wha? 12:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

That looks good. I particularly appreciate the "Use by non-Māori" section where the ref is likely to be useful to us pākehā.-Gadfium (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Cheers Grutness...wha? 04:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguator for Gordonton, New Zealand

Hi Gadfium. A few years back you merged Gordonton into Gordonton, New Zealand. I'm wondering whether we need the disambiguator or whether we could move the article to Gordonton. Was there any partic reason you kept the disambiguator? ta, Nurg (talk) 01:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

@Nurg: I suspect it was because the standard practice at the time was to keep the older title. I have no problem with moving it to the simpler name. If you concur that this is an uncontroversial move, I'll just go ahead and do it.-Gadfium (talk) 01:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. I concur. Go ahead, and thanks for volunteering. Nurg (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done.-Gadfium (talk) 02:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. Nurg (talk) 03:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Scorpions1325's vote

Hi Gadfium... Noticed you altered their vote and it now looks like they never voted in the current RfA. You could've discussed your concerns on their talk page without changing their vote. I've seen a vote like that before and think they meant it as a joke. This is just my honest opinion. But let me ping them here ~Scorpions1325 in case I'm wrong. Regards, Volten001 ☎ 05:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I did post to their talk page. Maybe they were joking, maybe they meant to type support, maybe they meant to put it in the oppose section. They have plenty of time to come back and clarify what they meant before the RfA finishes.-Gadfium (talk) 05:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. Since a bureaucrat has already reinstated the !vote, let's just leave it there. If the editor meant something else then they will respond and edit their !vote. Regards, Volten001 ☎ 06:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Graham Beards
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Dreamy Jazz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Clover Park, New Zealand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clover Park, New Zealand, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clover Park, New Zealand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I've Been Everywhere, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Waimea and Pukaki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

That's deliberate, because it isn't clear which locations the song refers to. The article already linked to these disambiguation pages, although not directly.-Gadfium (talk) 06:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Taumata etc

Your move protection was because of disruptive moves. Why protect it? Everything was precipitated by someone who was unaware of debate on the question, and who quickly attempted to self-revert once he learnt of the debate. (In my mind, the following moves are irrelevant, since they're artifacts of technical issues.) We're not likely to see such a move again, especially since the edit history of the alternate titles already prevents non-admins from moving the page to those titles. A single bad pagemove isn't a pattern of editing that disrupts progress toward improving an article or building the encyclopedia, and we don't generally move-protect titles just because of a single good-faith move against consensus. Nyttend (talk) 12:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

The article has been moved many times, usually without consensus. I see moves in 2014, 2015, 2018, 2020 and 2024. There are probably more moves between alternative titles or when early versions of MediaWiki used a different summary for moves. There are far more possible alternative titles that a good faith editor could try to move it to (various forms of disambiguation, with or without macrons, accidental leaving {{shy}} in the name, various different contractions and expansions of the name, transliterations, and combinations of all of these.-Gadfium (talk) 18:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
That article isn't on my watchlist, Nyttend, but if it had been, I'd applied move protection by now as well. Schwede66 04:35, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Kia Ora

Have seen your name around a lot, so I've left you a message on the talk page of the Colony of New Zealand regarding the transition from nominative sovereignty to substantive sovereignty, which is greatly discussed by historians. Arguably, the article at present reflects somewhat of a one-sided view which implies wrongly that the Colony's establishment was considered absolutely legitimate at the time, with substantive sovereignty from 1841. This is at odds with a good 50 years of historiography, so I was wondering whether you could review my suggestion. Ngā mihi nui. Dhantegge (talk) 07:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

The IP is at it again

Am I correct in remembering that you wrote a SQL query to find edits made by that IP who likes to remove macrons? He/she is at it again, currently using Manawatu Gorge. In the past few days it has happened on Canyon, List of mountain passes and Te Apiti. ―Panamitsu (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I do have an SQL query, which I run periodically, but it rarely finds anything because the anon has changed the edit summaries they use. insource is a more effective method of finding misspellings.-Gadfium (talk) 02:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Isabelle Belato
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Izno

CheckUser changes

removed Barkeep49

Technical news

  • Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
  • Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Northpark, New Zealand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northpark, New Zealand, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northpark, New Zealand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gadfium/Archive_27&oldid=1246649454"