User talk:Gabriel Duvall

Ronald Reagan edits

Unfortunately, that wasn't as helpful a link as you might have wished. Could you provide me with an actual ink to the diff, please? - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 21:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Ronald Reagan; do a search for my username or for the time I pointed out. Gabriel Duvall (talk) 22:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CyberAnth Wikiquette

Hey Gabriel, I have listed User:CyberAnth at the Wikiquette alert page for his behavior at the Jeremiah Wright controversy page, and more recent dealings with me at the Ronald Reagan page. I thought you may be interested to comment: here. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 21:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Supreme Court clerks

Category:Supreme Court clerks, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

Regarding my Federalist Society edits

I was simply trying to verify whether certain people were members of the FS - it's hard to find an objective source listing "all current members" given that the Fed-Soc.org main site isn't very helpful in listing, and I couldn't find any others. What are the problems with Huffington Post and EIR? --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 05:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I've read your comments again, I realize why not everything I find online or at the bookstore is "reliable". I never had any "agenda"; I just didn't know that LaRouche was such a LaDoucheBag in the first place. Recently, I've been cleaning out original research and unsourced statements from the FS article and hope to be able to improve it further. --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 03:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Income tax in the United States

I think the removal of the chart should at least have some mention on the talk page. Please expand.. why is it inaccurate (could this be corrected by a better description in the caption)? It appears to just follow the 2008 income tax brackets also listed in the article, why is this original research? I see no new synthesis of data. I did not create or place the image, but Dejo took a little effort to do so. I think we at least owe it a discussion point; otherwise, I'll consider it a drive by and revert the material. Morphh ^(talk) 12:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied in the posted areas and at this point I disagree with your interpretation. The image appears to be a graph of the effective tax rate using the income tax brackets for Single and Married filing jointly. It is a graph of the first two columns in the 2008 table. It does not violate OR as it creates no new synthesis of data. It is the data, just in a graph form, which is completely fine if we describe what is presented. Morphh ^(talk) 12:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Gabriel Duvall! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 51 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Daniel H. Lowenstein - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of California Fair Political Practices Commission

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on California Fair Political Practices Commission requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GeorgeLouis (talk) 23:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of California Fair Political Practices Commission

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on California Fair Political Practices Commission requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]