User talk:Gabirro

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

December 2010

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Republic of Cabinda. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Greenman (talk) 00:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at José Eduardo dos Santos, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Greenman (talk) 09:20, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Although you've stopped the living person violations, you have continued to edit war and generally ignore policy - I've opened a case here. Greenman (talk) 09:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Greenman

If there is soemthing wrong please state it here. My objective is not to make war or prove one side of the story. My is to state the reality and the truth as acurate as it gets. If something is wrong or preceived as wrong in stating a point please write it here in a clear manner so we are in the same level of understanding what is the point in reference to.

Best regards, Rui Gabirro

there are legal frameworks with which you should use to ascertain your concerns

(Bet2008 (talk) 23:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

January 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Republic of Cabinda. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you have problems with the Angolan Government or its head of state, there are legal frameworks with which you should use to ascertain your concerns (Bet2008 (talk) 23:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)) This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at José Eduardo dos Santos, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (Bet2008 (talk) 23:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Federation of Free States of Africa has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Federation of Free States of Africa, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. See WP:ORG and WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:56, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning

February 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Republic of Cabinda. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you have problems with the Angolan Government or its head of state, there are legal frameworks with which you should use to ascertain your concerns (Bet2008 (talk) 22:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)). This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at José Eduardo dos Santos, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (Bet2008 (talk) 22:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Greenman (talk) 13:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User:Bet2008. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 14:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you’ve seem to ignore us all.

February 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Republic of Cabinda. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I believe that your motives for editing Wikipedia’s pages are with bad faith. You have been warned several times nevertheless, you’ve seem to ignore us all. I regret to inform you that failure from you in stopping using Wikipedia’s platform as means to post misguided information or otherwise controversial content into an article or any Wikipedia page, your account may be permanently disabled, and the use of freedom of information act will be used against you to expose your real Identity and inform your internet service provider Sky, of your constant anddisturbing acts of vandalism. (Bet2008 (talk) 23:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)). This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at José Eduardo dos Santos, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (Bet2008 (talk) 23:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:08, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Jose Eduardo dos Santos, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 20:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to José Eduardo dos Santos. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tgeairn (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References are in place as shown on the article talk page.

Denisarona, Tgeairn

If you are blind and cannot see the references (3 in fact), then I would suggest you to pay a visit to SpecSavers they have currently an offer on buy one spectacles get one free. --Gabirro (talk) 09:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I detest 100% Stupidity. 100% Anti Communist

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Denisarona, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. You have warned multiple times for adding dubious content and then launching into personal attacks when it is removed. Greenman (talk) 20:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for making personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Salvio

^{Let's talk about it!} 18:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to José Eduardo dos Santos. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. You are again adding unsourced information to the article, exactly what you've been warned for on multiple previous occasions. The controversy about his place of birth can be added to the article, but in a neutral way, fully sourced from reliable sources. Greenman (talk) 19:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Greenman,

As usual you have proven to be an arse hole

--Gabirro (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. v/r - T P 03:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Republic of Cabinda, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've been warned and blocked many times for repeatedly removing cited text and for adding uncited text. Please contribute constructively now that you've returned. Greenman (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reinaldo dos Santos

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reinaldo dos Santos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Chmarkine (talk) 07:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kneipp, Hydrotherapy, Naturopathy, Allopathic medicine

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 20:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond rather than edit-warring. --Ronz (talk) 15:04, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by deleting article content based upon your personal analysis, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 15:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gabirro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Carrel copyright problem

I have removed content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-005-4258-2, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gabirro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at James Morison (physician), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 12:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at James Morison (physician). bonadea contributions talk 17:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hut 8.5 17:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]