User talk:Gabi.labuschagne

This is Gabi.labuschagne's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cameron Moulène (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cameron Moulène and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 07:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Gabi.labuschagne, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 07:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cameron Moulène (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not referenced by non-user generated content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cameron Moulène and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cameron Moulène has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cameron Moulène. Thanks! Whispe ring 23:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you so much. I am new at Wikipedia and have no experience post and editing. Your help will be greatly appreciated. DEHenry33 (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Gabi.labuschagne. I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. Similarly, IMDB is not reliable for most biographical information. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 00:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Hi Gabi,

I looked over the changes you made to my submission and I don't really like the changes. Thanks for trying to help, but I think I will redo the submission with a lot of changes eliminating much of the material that doesn't cite the source.. Please don't make changes to my submission without contacting me before hand with your suggestions. DEHenry33 (talk) 00:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Eugene Henry has been accepted

David Eugene Henry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lacypaperclip (talk) 14:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cameron Moulène (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lacypaperclip was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cameron Moulène and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cameron Moulène, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lacypaperclip (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Gabi.labuschagne, I just had a look at the above article. In the "References" section, there is a list containing several websites. As per Lacypaperclip's comments above, Wikipedia requires significant coverage of a subject, not just mere mentions. Have a look at the final reference, for example. It's an interview with Jenn McAllister; Cameron Moulene gets a single mention in the article, mentioning he's a co-star in Foursome. That article does not demonstrate that Cameron Moulene is notable; it might demonstrate that Jenn McAllister is notable, because she was interviewed by AOL.com. Similarly, links such as this one and this one doesn't really tell us much more than "he's an actor". Several other websites are about television series (such as Foursome), and just mention that he's an actor in the series. None of those demonstrate that he's notable. Can you do a bit of a cleanup on that article to remove links that just mention him in passing, and add in ones (from reliable sources) where he is the main subject? I had a quick look, and unfortunately couldn't find many... TheMightyPeanut (talk) 05:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cameron Moulène has been accepted

Cameron Moulène, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheMightyPeanut (talk) 04:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]