User talk:GNUtoo

Articles for deletion nomination of Comparison_of_embedded_Linux_devices

I have nominated Comparison_of_embedded_Linux_devices, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison_of_embedded_Linux_devices. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Spuzzdawg (talk) 21:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you can delete it,content should be added to http://www.elinux.org/Products instead. GNUtoo(my point of views(for npov), howto customise a signature) | talk 22:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archived talks

windows and linux comparison page(methodology question on how to handle the structure of such page) and futhurer technical discussion

New Talks

References

License tagging for Image:Gpl and open-source.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gpl and open-source.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Osi-certified.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Osi-certified.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

IMatrix

I just noticed your new article on IMatrix Corporation. First of all, "corporation" is misspelled. You can fix that by using the page move function. Secondly, you need to tell the reader why this corporation is important. See WP:CORP for guidelines on the inclusion of corporations. Erik the Rude 19:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can either redirect your user page to your talk page, or you can click "My Preferences" and follow the instructions. I've never done that myself, so if you need help, try the Wikipedia:Help desk. Erik the Rude 21:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Customizing your signature

I came across your talk page via IMatrix, and I noticed your comments about customizing the ~~~~. This page will help you figure it out. In my opinion, it takes a lot of trial and error to get it just right. If you have any more questions, feel free to leave me a message. Have a great day and happy editing! Amalas =^_^= 17:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a pretty simple signature that might work for you. It has both a link to your user page and a link to your talk page. Go to "my preferences" link at the top right of the screen. In the "nickname" field, copy this into the text box exactly: [[User:00 tux|00 tux]] | [[User talk:00 tux|talk]]. This should make your signature look something like this: 00 tux | talk. (Currently the talk link isn't linked because self-referencing links are bold instead of a link). Make sure there is a check in the "raw signature" check box. Click on "save" and you should be ready to go. I hope that helps. Amalas =^_^= 13:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

open source wifi drivers

I know what OpenHAL is, I just didn't think it was enough of a change from regular MadWifi to warrant it's own entry in the table, perhaps just a note at the bottom of the table.

Regarding your errors it looks like you'll have to fiddle with the makefile to get OpenHAL compiling properly on Linux. I'm not sure about the regdomain error with OpenBSD, the ath man page does not mention the error or anything regarding specifying a regdomain. You may want to have a look at the source code and possibly write a patch.

I am a Gentoo and OpenBSD user by the way. I'm pretty sure I've seen your username on the gentoo forums asking about OpenHAL. dystopianray 23:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from my main user page

Open source Wi-Fi drivers

I'm glad you like the changes. The reason I removed OpenHAL was because it is basically just the MadWifi driver with a replacement HAL. I don't think it actually alters the capabilities of the driver at all and I guess it could be added as a note under the table. The Realtek driver didn't actually have any information apart from the name, so it's entry would have been mostly blank anyway. dystopianray 02:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TiVo and open source software

I reverted your TiVo edit for a few reasons. Firstly, it was poorly written from a grammatical stance. Secondly, the way it was worded made it read as being very POV. Thirdly, I don't feel that it's worthy of being included. While I realize that TiVo's policies are of concern to open source enthusiasts, I just don't think it's necessary to have that in the article. However, that's not my call to make, so perhaps if you re-wrote the section to make it more gramatically sound and asked if it was appropriate on the talk page, it could be added to the article, assuming others agree. - seinman 04:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Acer Aspire 5020

A tag has been placed on Acer Aspire 5020, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Turlo Lomon 11:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I see that you have not edited in a while. Come back! Uetz 17:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Isafer 02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Isafer 02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fair use of Osi-certified.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Osi-certified.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Osi-certified.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thinboy00 ^talk/_contribs @972, i.e. 22:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~==Speedy deletion of Image:Osi-certified.jpg==~~

A tag has been placed on Image:Osi-certified.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Osi-certified.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thinboy00 ^talk/_contribs @68, i.e. 00:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Sorry, self revert. -- Thinboy00 ^talk/_contribs @83, i.e. 01:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Isafer.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Isafer.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Sicilia sea 001.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Sicilia sea 001.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 01:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of TinyKRNL

I have nominated TinyKRNL, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TinyKRNL. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rohedin (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Comaparison of Free Embedded Operating Systems" article

Regarding the title of your user space article "Comaparison of Free Embedded Operating Systems". I believe it should be "Comparison" instead of "Comaparison". --Mortense (talk) 09:32, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GOsa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GOsa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOsa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FuFoFuEd (talk) 04:31, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, GNUtoo. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NuttX RTOS.
Message added 17:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sudo Ghost 17:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	I really like what you are doing with Replicant. Thanks! Isacdaavid (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks GNUtoo(my point of views(for npov)) | talk 17:10, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Talk:Redmine, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I came from Replicant page and saw your COI-declaration, I wander where you draw the line. I haven't seen any rules, only for "paid" and "organizations". I wouldn't say I'm a "free software developer" (or open source). Would you say sending in a bug report binds you in some way; documentation fixes/translations? Or minor code changes? I wouldn't want to choose between helping free/open software and WP.. I try to be neutral, but I could say I'm a fan of some software.. comp.arch (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GNUtoo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GNUtoo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GNUtoo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comparison of open-source wireless drivers

The article Comparison of open-source wireless drivers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of risk analysis Microsoft Excel add-ins (2nd nomination)/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of power management software suites/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of XMPP server software/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of DNA melting prediction software

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]