User talk:G-man80

Welcome!

Hello, G-man80, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like G-Man's Reviews, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of G-Man's Reviews

A tag has been placed on G-Man's Reviews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sly Cooper (series) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b' (link(s): http://gmanmoviereviews.blogspot.com/2008/08/g-mans-top-four-games-that-should-be.html) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 00:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fog Warning (film)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fog Warning (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:NN unreleased film

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 (talk) 04:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Warning (film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 21:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete comments made by other users (as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Warning (film)) or remove discussions from deletion lists; this is regarded as vandalism and could get you blocked. If you don't think the article should be deleted, please state your reasons at the deletion discussion. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Warning (film) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest on Fog Warning (film)‎

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia's guidelines on external links and conflict of interest:

From Wikipedia:External links:

Links normally to be avoided:

"11. Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority (this exception is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies)."

Advertising and conflicts of interest:

"[I]n line with Wikipedia policies, you should avoid linking to a site that you own, maintain, or represent."

From Wikipedia:Conflict of interest: Self-promotion:

"Conflict of interest often presents itself in the form of self-promotion, including advertising links, personal website links...
Examples of these types of material include:

[...]*2. Links that appear to promote otherwise obscure individuals by pointing to their personal pages."

--Rrburke^(talk) 02:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/G-man80. Thank you. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 10:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]