User talk:Fydcinnz

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Inception2010 (talk) 09:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fydcinnz! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:21, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Recent edit to Violet Brown

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Violet Brown, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dan Koehl (talk) 08:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Violet Brown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 09:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of the verified oldest women without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 14:21, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ajay Devgn. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oldest people. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 21:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Violet Brown, you may be blocked from editing. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 22:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of oldest living people. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 17:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this your last warning. The next time you make a pointless edit, save it, and then revert it, as you have done countless times already, I will take you to WP:ANI, where I will recommend you get either blocked completely from Wikipedia for at least 3 months OR get permanently topic banned from Longevity articles. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 06:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. User:DerbyCountyinNZ could you please stop your edit war on Violet Brown and your hammering of this user? Otherwise you will go to AN/I for harassment and disruptive editing. The Banner talk 19:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it! There is no edit war. This user makes a (pointless) edit, saves it, and then reverts. An enormous number of IPs that have been blocked for EXACTLY the same behavior. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 03:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion about your disruptive editing

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 04:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Longevity, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

BlackcurrantTea (talk) 06:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You have been warned about your practice of adding and then immediately reverting tiny unhelpful edits, but have not stopped.[1][2] Nor have you given any explanation of these edits, which are pointless as well as bloating up page histories. Please either stop or explain what you're doing. If it's something that happens because your mobile device is unmanageable, please don't edit Wikipedia from it.

I've also seen you add actual information, with an edit summary "Important information",[3] and then immediately revert it with "Not necessary to give this info"[4] — that is, the same information that you called "important" two minuters earlier. I don't understand that. A similar thing happened here and here — again, note the timestamps. When you edit articles, please don't press "Save" until you're sure of your edit. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Experimenting on articles may ultimately get you blocked, especially in this area, which is under discretionary sanctions (see above). Bishonen | talk 09:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

August 2017

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Saif Ali Khan. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:20, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nabi Tajima. nihlus kryik (talk) 09:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Disembodied Soul (talk) 12:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]