User talk:Fun71528

Welcome!

Hi Tamar274! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?

Need sources for stats change....most are restore numbers as per 2021 source in article. ...it's there areally reason your using projections for a year that isn't over?Moxy- 01:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Finland. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Once again changing statistics without updating references. TylerBurden (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDP_RPCH@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD

Tamar274 (talk) 03:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can check all my information is accurate. Tamar274 (talk) 03:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't add that reference in your first edit, you instead sneakily removed the date of the old reference and simply changed the statistics with no source. Based on that source you inserted incorrect numbers as well, so you have been reverted again. TylerBurden (talk) 08:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I fixed it Tamar274 (talk) 10:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about?… The rankings are accurate you can check … Tamar274 (talk) 10:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I was looking at the wrong thing, you inserted the correct ones, I'll fix it. TylerBurden (talk) 11:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARBPIA

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

nableezy - 17:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must follow these page-specific restrictions until you have 500 edits and have been here 30 days

For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing

the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and
edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces with the exception of userspace ("related content")

Also,

500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.

The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:

1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.

2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.

3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.

Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Doug Weller talk 11:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fun71528, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tow (talk) 14:37, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed ECP as you were gaming the system

through fast multiple minor edits. Doug Weller talk 16:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I edited mainly in economic values. that the edits are very short. I edited close to 100 countries and made changes and edits that helped Wikipedia to keep up to date. Show me one entry that I made wrong or inaccurate or missing data or unsecured , please show me. Fun71528 (talk) 16:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits like this, this and this are clearly gaming the system to up your edit count. nableezy - 16:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not, please check and tell me if I have one edit that is incorrect. I changed the economy values that hadn't been updated in years. Please check and tell me if one edit was wrong or unsourced Fun71528 (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was not ! It’s so disrespectful for you to say that!! I’m on Wikipedia for almost half year! Fun71528 (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Literally not even one edit that I have done was wrong or unsourced…. Please find one edit that I did that is wrong… Fun71528 (talk) 17:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those three edits made no changes to the content at all. You added/removed a single space where it made no sense to do so. You made a series of superficial edits that had no impact on anything to increase your edit-count. Textbook permission gaming. If you go make useful edits Im sure Doug or any other admin will reinstate the permission. But it appears, obviously IMO, that you made a large number of edits specifically to edit the Israel article, which until that series of edits had been your near lone focus here. nableezy - 17:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's just your opinion, you can think what you want, but to say that my edits are worthless after I updated the economic data of nearly 100 countries that had not been updated for years is really absurd and useless. In any case, there is room for me to file an appeal on this. Fun71528 (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain any of these three edits: [1], [2] and [3]. You added or removed whitespace within a citation template. Why? nableezy - 19:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a place I can appeal this? Fun71528 (talk) 18:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I compiled the economic data of nearly 100 countries, which had not been updated for years. When I changed their economic values (and sometimes also the values of the countries themselves that were not updated such as Norway or Turkey) an updated source of information as of 2022 should be added. I added the source of the International Monetary Fund for April 2022. Many times the structure needs to be changed or edited several times in order to update the data to be compatible with the International Monetary Fund report for 2022. Many times this requires editing several times because sometimes my edits were not successful, so I took an existing structure of the International Monetary Fund for 2022 and changed it to the country code: for example "IMFWONO" (for Norway )many times I failed to insert the source so it turned out that I edited several times. Fun71528 (talk) 19:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I compiled the economic data of nearly 100 countries, which had not been updated for years. When I changed their economic values (and sometimes also the values of the countries themselves that were not updated such as Norway or Turkey) an updated source of information as of 2022 should be added. I added the source of the International Monetary Fund for April 2022. Many times the structure needs to be changed or edited several times in order to update the data to be compatible with the International Monetary Fund report for 2022. Many times this requires editing several times because sometimes my edits were not successful, so I took an existing structure of the International Monetary Fund for 2022 and changed it to the country code: for example "IMFWONO" (for Norway many times I failed to insert the source so it turned out that I edited several times. Fun71528 (talk) 19:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I said , please find one edit I’ve did that is unsourced/incorrect/Does not conform to Wikipedia's writing rules . Fun71528 (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically those three edits, why did you add or remove a single space? nableezy - 20:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me where I can appeal this decision? Fun71528 (talk) 20:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I told you , i had hard time and got confused adding the new sources updated to - April 2022 from the IMF that’s why a lot of my edits was wrong after that I fix that.

Fun71528 (talk) 21:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I explained to you . Fun71528 (talk) 21:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cmon, no you did not explain what I asked you. This edit. You added a space after "access-date=11 December 2019". Why? nableezy - 21:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I appeal this decision? Fun71528 (talk) 21:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I explained to you and I will explain again, as I said in all the economic values and the values of the countries themselves The sources were not updated to the last update of the International Monetary Fund April 2022, so there were many times I was unable to insert the link as required. I took the body of the link and added for example (Norway) "IMFWEONO" I came across many times and this is the mistake many times that I accidentally edited and I apologize for that but as I said I corrected everything you will not find even one edit among the hundreds I made that is not accompanied by sources or is incorrect or not according to the rules of Wikipedia Fun71528 (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And that's why I find it ridiculous that you block me, there is not even one edit I made that violates Wikipedia's rules or is incorrect or is not accompanied by authorized sources. If I wanted to get 500 edits I would have done it a long time ago , I’m a half year after member of Wikipedia.. Fun71528 (talk) 22:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There isnt any change in values in this edit. You just added a space to a reference that was there since 2019. But whatever, if you want to appeal I guess you can try WP:AN? But you arent blocked, you just lost that user right. nableezy - 22:08, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there another place to ask? I don't think this is the right place… Fun71528 (talk) 22:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Repetition

It is pointless repeating yourself on the Israel talk page. I explained to you previously that you should not take silence for consent, silence is more likely to be disagreement. There are plenty of editors at that page, if one of them thinks that there is something to your question, they will respond and if no-one does, then perhaps you ought to think about moving on. Selfstudier (talk) 12:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I need to create a discussion, that's the whole point, right? I have the right to ask to remove the map that I think is unnecessary. The fact that you don't answer doesn't mean you agree/disagree... Fun71528 (talk) 13:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try and be clearer, if no-one responds, move on, don't spam the talk page. Selfstudier (talk) 13:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why aren’t you answering? I asked a legitimate question. Fun71528 (talk) 13:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? You think someone should answer you immediately? This is like the behaviour that you’ve been warned about. Doug Weller talk 15:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have the right to open a discussion, and I have the right to speak on the talk page. The fact that you choose to ignore it after that mostly speaks volumes for you... I have opened many discussions on legitimate requests and have not received an answer... Fun71528 (talk) 17:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No-one is required to answer. Instead, consider why it is that one is not forthcoming. I repeat my pro tip, move on, do something else. Selfstudier (talk) 17:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to List of tallest buildings in Israel, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 13:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of tallest buildings in Israel, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Do not change criteria without getting wp:consensus on talk:List of tallest buildings in Israel. See wp:OWN regarding your "do not change" wp:ES. Adakiko (talk) 22:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1st, 2nd, 3rd

Any number that ends with 1, 2, or 3 is followed by -st, -nd, and -rd, respectively. The only exceptions are 11th, 12th, and 13th. For example, 72th is incorrect; it's 72nd. 12th is correct, while 12nd is not. Yue🌙 00:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Fun71528 (talk) 07:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GDP articles

Hi there. Can you please edit "List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita" the same way as you did with "List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita"? This is the most logical way to sort these data, not mixing values from different sources. NeonFor (talk) 09:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Febuary 2023

About your arguments in the List of countries by nominal GDP per capita

Prior consensus has clearly decided that Taiwan is to be referred to as a country.

The RfC (Request for comment) page on which this decision was made can be found here. Please establish the consensus on Talk page:Taiwan if you dispute about the previous decision, otherwise any change to the application to refer to Taiwan as a state, island, province of China, or other definition would be reverted. Besides, the list does not set any criteria about the "UN member states" included only as you claimed, a bunch of partially recognized states and dependencies were also shown among the list. It seems to be your personal opinion rather than a Wikipedia regulation.

Leave your political debate on the relevant site (Talk:Taiwan) if you continue to disagree the previous decision. Not in the non-political related topic as List of countries by nominal GDP per capita. The introduction of Taiwan would stay the same unless any further evidences you can provide to overturn the established consensus.

LVTW2 (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]