User talk:Fulonastar

Fulonastar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fulonastar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Sansa Stark

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for the well-written material you added to Sansa Stark. However, a plot summary of that length is not really necessary, especially as so much of it overlaps with Sansa's storyline from the books, which is already summarized earlier in the article. It might be helpful to incorporate into that section some of the detail you added, especially if it can be tied to out-of-universe commentary on the character from reliable sources. In Wikipedia, plot summaries are only useful to the extent that they clarify the larger meaning and significance of the work; see the discussion of plot summaries from our Manual of Style for more on the topic. If you want to discuss the structure of the Sansa article with other interested users, feel free to start a new section on the article's talk page, and if you have any questions, you can also ask me right here on your user talk page. Thanks again for working to improve Wikipedia. Brendan Moody (talk) 00:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of popular teen parents on YouTube

Hello Fulonastar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of popular teen parents on YouTube for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 18:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jessica Skube

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jessica Skube requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing reliable sources, puffery

Hello. I saw you edited Abigail Breslin, and I wanted to explain why I reverted your edit. For one thing, you removed several reliable sources without explanation. Second, you added unsourced puffery, such as "Breslin garnered critical acclaim and worldwide recognition". You can re-add your factual changes, but please do not remove reliable sources without explanation or re-add the unsourced puffery. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you added "Moretz garnered critical acclaim and worldwide recognition for her performance" to Chloë Grace Moretz. Please read WP:PEACOCK and WP:V. This is somewhat important, as you could get blocked for disruption if you continue adding unsourced puffery to articles. It seems you want to expand the leads of articles on actors, which is good, but you're doing it in a way that breaks Wikipedia's guidelines. Wikipedia is written in a factual – and even rather bland – style, much different than fan sites and gushy media. As an encyclopedia, our prose should be more formal than this. Additionally, there simply isn't enough room in the lead for every single interesting fact and award; they, too, should be summarized to only the most important bits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Chloë Grace Moretz, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jessica Skube

The article Jessica Skube has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DGG ( talk ) 17:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wolferton Splash, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Queen Mary and Matt Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jared Padalecki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supernatural (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Britt Robertson

added a link pointing to Self-made

Natalie Dormer

added a link pointing to Sweet Nothings

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anya Taylor-Joy

added a link pointing to Morgan (film)

Lily Collins

added a link pointing to Golden Globe Award for Best Actress - Musical or Comedy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ACCESS and tables

Please be aware that the improper use of 'rowspan' in tables disadvantages a segment of our readership, and thus violates WP:ACCESS (see WP:DTT) which exists to support Wikipedia's Non-discrimination policy. Also, generally, wholesale changes to tables like 'Awards' tables should not be made unless there is a compelling policy-based reason (e.g. WP:ACCESS) for doing so, or unless consensus has been established to do so. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, also note that there is nothing "wrong" with having the 'Work' column be the second column in 'Awards and nominations' tables – e.g. Hannah Murray or Sarah Gadon. See also: List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence which is a WP:Featured list. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bel Powley

added a link pointing to Niagara

Ella Purnell

added a link pointing to Richmond

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:2nd place

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:2nd place, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:08, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fulonastar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]