User talk:Fuad-nse-03
Appearance
Welcome!
[edit] Getting Started
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips
- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Cassiopeia talk 10:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 08:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to respectfully discuss the recent reversion of my contribution. The second paragraph of the "Corruption" section includes a claim that Sheikh Hasina and her family embezzled $5 billion from the project, as reported by Global Defense Corp. However, this article lacks credible evidence and citations, which raises significant questions about its reliability. Additionally, the Carnegie Endowment study does not mention Bangladesh, focusing instead on potential corruption in South Africa, which is why I removed the third paragraph. The final paragraph compares the costs of constructing nuclear power plants in China and Bangladesh, but this comparison may be irrelevant, as China has the necessary infrastructure, extensive experience, and a well-established domestic nuclear industry, having built more than eight reactors. It is also important to note that Rosatom did not secure the contract to build the entire plant in China like in Bangladesh. Therefore, I kindly request that you review my findings and consider reverting the changes.
- I also would like to mention that I am a former student of Nuclear Engineering. Fuad-nse-03 (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, You removed sourced content that is the reason for the above message. Info added/changed need to be supported by independent, reliable source for verification. If you have info you want to added which you said it was missing, then go and find sources such as from the newspaper and books and add the info in along with the citation. Any disagreement of the content, you can go to the article talk page and raise your issues there. Any editors who are interest in the subject will join and a non involved editor will close the discussion (if any) and decide the outcome. Cassiopeia talk 10:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your guidance. I have included new information in the article by referencing a trustworthy and independent source. Fuad-nse-03 (talk) 16:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, You removed sourced content that is the reason for the above message. Info added/changed need to be supported by independent, reliable source for verification. If you have info you want to added which you said it was missing, then go and find sources such as from the newspaper and books and add the info in along with the citation. Any disagreement of the content, you can go to the article talk page and raise your issues there. Any editors who are interest in the subject will join and a non involved editor will close the discussion (if any) and decide the outcome. Cassiopeia talk 10:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- No worries. For source from the web, pls use the "horizontal format" of Template:Cite web and use Tempalte:Cite book for source from the book. Be safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 21:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Fuad-nse-03 You are reverting my edit, which has genuine references. Do not write about what you studied or did not study. Wikipedia doesn't care about your and my degrees. You just started editing Wikipedia unless you have multiple accounts. I have a Bachelor of Engineering degree with double majors and a master's degree with various publications. I don’t brag about my studies. Do not remove any genuine edits. It’s inevitable that the media will expose all of Bangladesh’s corruption. You can't stop these exposure. Those who took bribes, they should have thought about it before taking kickbacks. Best Regards, Canberra2021 (talk) 10:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- I deleted your statement about Rosatom's possible actions if the investigation starts, as the sources you referenced only included financial audits from 2021 and 2022 and did not discuss future possibilities. Additionally, your edit included your own commentary. I explained all this on the article talk page Talk:Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant Fuad-nse-03 (talk) 11:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)