User talk:Fstopcinema

This is Fstopcinema's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 05:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Fstopcinema, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 05:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek^talktome 13:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Simply not enough major reviews since that's what we would need in notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 23:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel A. Miller (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fstopcinema/Samuel A. Miller and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 00:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Grutness. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Felix von Luckner have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Grutness...wha? 10:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you are paid in any way for contributing to Wikipedia, you must disclose it.

WP:PAID says

"The Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require that all editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which they receive, or expect to receive, compensation". " "A paid contribution is one that involves contributing to Wikipedia in exchange for money or other inducements. It includes adding or removing content from any page, including articles and talk pages. If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, either directly or indirectly, you must disclose who is paying you to edit (your "employer"), who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship."

Your username matches that of an organisation involved in cinema advertising and you've been promoting a film that you seem to be involved in. You need to follow the instructions at WP:PAID on how to disclose.

You obviously have a conflict of interest (see WP:COI). This advises that those with a conflict of interest, including paid editors, are very strongly discouraged from directly editing affected articles, but should post content proposals on the talk pages of existing articles, and should put new articles through the articles for creation process, so they can be reviewed prior to being published.

Doug Weller talk 18:59, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doug Weller I am not a paid shill for a media publicity company if that's what your question is? If I work in Cinema does that preclude me from adding or amending a genuine film article? for example: if I work in dry cleaning, am I not allowed to ad or amend an article related to cleaning products? You are an administrator, surely you can step in and sort out the complexities? Genuine Film, Genuine People, No paid placement, Genuine MSM Media Articles, Genuine history, Genuine location, Both sides represented, Genuine story of oppression of a minority indigenous people, a voice for the voiceless. Too hot for Wikipedia to handle? I am beginning to understand more and more each day.

Unfortunately we have an extremely serious problem with paid editors, and you appear to be in the cinema publicity business and are using the name of the company as your username, which is against our policy but I’m not pushing that. You haven’t stated explicitly whether you receive or expect any, and we do mean any, form of compensation no matter how minor. You are clearly promoting the film on Wikipedia. 06:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

User:Doug Weller I'd love for you to find a single cinema advert placement there. f-stopcinema.com is a dormant web address I believe. But of course with administrators so worried about participation in the subject, I think we could just ask a non participant ie your editors or a member of the public to ad it? Or is it allowed to be an indigenous person who was in the film or is that problematic?

Could you please just give me an explicit answer? Are you or do you expect to receive any compensation from anyone involved in the film? I'm not getting involved in whether it should have an article. If the draft is approved, a sentence about the film would be appropriate on some articles. But not until. That's just the way we work. The websites is dormant but not the FaceBook page. Doug Weller talk 11:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doug Weller 'Et tu Brute' 'Even you Brutus"? 'not getting involved in whether it should have an article' are you sure?? should a Genocide really have a voice Doug? (I can't believe we are at this point) Human Rights tags along behind possible perceived pecuniary interest?? complicity in silencing a minorities voice is what it's called, and leaves stains which cannot be washed from the hands. Placing corporate ads in cinemas is a long way from being paid to publicize independent films believe me. The article is going to go into my sandbox and if anyone has the gumption and isn't afraid of human rights, or touchy subjects like colonialism and is completely unconnected to the topic; then they might be able to post it as a voice for the voiceless. I say to you Turn around before it is too late.

Orphaned non-free image File:The Wizard of New Zealand on horseback The Bluff Station, Walkemup mountain in background Pitt Island 2016.tiff

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Wizard of New Zealand on horseback The Bluff Station, Walkemup mountain in background Pitt Island 2016.tiff. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read the links in the above decline messages; you may simply have to wait before getting an article on the film.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Fstopcinema/Samuel A. Miller

Hello, Fstopcinema. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samuel A. Miller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Home Lander (talk) 23:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty

Hello, Fstopcinema. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Wizard & The Commodore - A Real Sea Shanty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]