User talk:Frownsy

October 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kelly Rowland, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frownsy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Frownsy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Like This (Kelly Rowland song). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Red Panda 25 14:20, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Nicki Minaj

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nicki Minaj, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 07:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advice regarding genre edits to Nicki Minaj

Frownsy, your edits to Nicki Minaj have been reverted nine times in the past few weeks over unsupported genre changes. At this point it is becoming disruptive and you should make a better effort to fulfill other editors' requests for sources. Even if the information you are adding is true, you need to provide proof, especially when there is a dispute over its inclusion.

Most recently, you claimed that the prior consensus had been reached regarding genre in the Nicki Minaj talk page archives, but I can find no such discussion in the archives. Before you edit the article again, I suggest you open a new discussion on the article talk page and establish consensus on your genre inclusion; link to the prior discussion regarding genre, and provide links to reliable sources for the genre you wish to add. Doing this will demonstrate an openness to discussion regarding the dispute, and help avoid edit warring. Thank you. —Laoris (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kellymoat (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kellymoat (talk) 12:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Frownsy reported by User:Kellymoat (Result: ). Thank you. Kellymoat (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]